Literature DB >> 30625336

Return-sweep saccades during reading in adults and children.

Adam J Parker1, Timothy J Slattery2, Julie A Kirkby3.   

Abstract

During reading, eye movement patterns differ between children and adults. Children make more fixations that are longer in duration and make shorter saccades. Return-sweeps are saccadic eye movements that move a reader's fixation to a new line of text. Return-sweeps move fixation further than intra-line saccades and often undershoot their target. This necessitates a corrective saccade to bring fixation closer to the start of the line. There have been few empirical investigations of return-sweep saccades in adults, and even fewer in children. In the present study, we examined return-sweeps of 47 adults and 48 children who read identical multiline texts. We found that children launch their return-sweeps closer to the end of the line and target a position closer to the left margin. Therefore, children fixate more extreme positions on the screen when reading for comprehension. Furthermore, children required a corrective saccade following a return-sweep more often than adults. Analysis of the duration of the fixation preceding the corrective saccade indicated that children are as efficient as adults at responding to retinal feedback following a saccade. Rather than consider differences in adult's and children's return-sweep behaviour an artefact of oculomotor control, we believe that these differences represent adult's ability to utilise parafoveal processing to encode text at extreme positions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Eye movements; Oculomotor control; Reading; Return-sweep saccades

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30625336     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  A novel approach for detection of dyslexia using convolutional neural network with EOG signals.

Authors:  Ramis Ileri; Fatma Latifoğlu; Esra Demirci
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Adam J Parker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

3.  Visual fixations rather than saccades dominate the developmental eye movement test.

Authors:  Nouk Tanke; Annemiek D Barsingerhorn; F Nienke Boonstra; Jeroen Goossens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Individuals with dyslexia use a different visual sampling strategy to read text.

Authors:  Léon Franzen; Zoey Stark; Aaron P Johnson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Spelling ability influences early letter encoding during reading: Evidence from return-sweep eye movements.

Authors:  Adam J Parker; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Return-sweep saccades in oral reading.

Authors:  Victoria I Adedeji; Martin R Vasilev; Julie A Kirkby; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-25

7.  Altered eye movements during reading under degraded viewing conditions: Background luminance, text blur, and text contrast.

Authors:  Haojue Yu; Foroogh Shamsi; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Algorithms for the automated correction of vertical drift in eye-tracking data.

Authors:  Jon W Carr; Valentina N Pescuma; Michele Furlan; Maria Ktori; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.