Literature DB >> 30625244

Severe structural deterioration of small aortic bioprostheses treated with valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Tomasz Stankowski1, Sleiman Sebastian Aboul-Hassan2, Farzaneh Seifi-Zinab1, Volker Herwig1, Miroslava Kubikova1, Axel Harnath1, Dirk Fritzsche1, Bartłomiej Perek3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (VIV-TAVI) in patients with degenerated small bioprostheses.
METHODS: Outcomes of consecutive 27 high-risk patients (logistic EuroSCORE 35.5 ± 18.5%) with a mean age of 81.0 ± 5.9 years who underwent VIV-TAVI for degenerated small bioprostheses (19 mm-11.1%; 20 mm-11.1%; 21 mm-77.8%) were analyzed. Medtronic CoreValve (n = 11) or CoreValve Evolut-R prostheses (n = 16) were implanted. Follow-up was 3.2 ± 2.0 years.
RESULTS: Early mortality was 11.1%. One patient died intraoperatively due to left ventricle perforation, two others during the in-hospital period as a result of sudden cardiac death and pulmonary embolism. VIV-TAVI was completed in 26 cases (96.3%-success rate). Two patients required pacemaker implantation. Acute kidney injury occurred in two other patients. At discharge, mean transvalvular gradient was 19.2 ± 9.5 mmHg and in 25.9% of patients mean gradient exceeded 20 mmHg. Overall mortality was 25.9% and mortality from cardiac or unknown causes at 18.5%. Ninety percent of survivors were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II.
CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral VIV-TAVI in patients with small, degenerated bioprostheses appears to be a promising alternative to surgery. Although the vast majority of patients have significant improvement in their NYHA class, the rate of persistent, residual gradients is relatively high and will need to be followed closely with serial echocardiograms.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outcomes; reintervention; structural valve deterioration; transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30625244     DOI: 10.1111/jocs.13976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Surg        ISSN: 0886-0440            Impact factor:   1.620


  2 in total

1.  Balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bioprosthetic dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-An Lee; An-Hsun Chou; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Dong-Yi Chen; Hsin-Fu Lee; Kuang-Tso Lee; Pao-Hsien Chu; Yu-Ting Cheng; Shang-Hung Chang; Shao-Wei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Meta-Analysis of Stroke and Mortality Rates in Patients Undergoing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Sascha Macherey; Max Meertens; Victor Mauri; Christian Frerker; Matti Adam; Stephan Baldus; Tobias Schmidt
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.501

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.