Gwen Costa Jacobsohn1, Matthew Hollander1, Aaron P Beck1, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi2, Nicole Werner3, Manish N Shah1,4,5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 2. School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 4. Department of Medicine (Geriatrics and Gerontology), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 5. Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: People with dementia (PwD) frequently use emergency care services. To mitigate the disproportionately high rate of emergency care use by PwD, an understanding of contributing factors driving reliance on emergency care services and identification of feasible alternatives are needed. This study aimed to identify clinician, caregiver, and service providers' views and experiences of unmet needs leading to emergency care use among community-dwelling PwD and alternative ways of addressing these needs. DESIGN: Qualitative, employing semistructured interviews with clinicians, informal caregivers, and aging service providers. SETTING: Wisconsin, United States. PARTICIPANTS: Informal caregivers of PwD (n = 4), emergency medicine physicians (n = 4), primary care physicians (n = 5), geriatric healthcare providers (n = 5), aging service providers (n = 6), and community paramedics (n = 3). MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics of participants and data from semistructured interviews. FINDINGS: Four major themes were identified from interviews: (1) system fragmentation influences emergency care use by PwD, (2) informational, decision-making, and social support needs influence emergency care use by PwD, (3) emergency departments (EDs) are not designed to optimally address PwD and caregiver needs, and (4) options to prevent and address emergency care needs of PwD. CONCLUSION: Participants identified numerous system and individual-level unmet needs and offered many recommendations to prevent or improve ED use by PwD. These novel findings, aggregating the perspectives of multiple dementia-care stakeholder groups, serve as the first step to developing interventions that prevent the need for emergency care or deliver tailored emergency care services to this vulnerable population through new approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:711-718, 2019.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES:People with dementia (PwD) frequently use emergency care services. To mitigate the disproportionately high rate of emergency care use by PwD, an understanding of contributing factors driving reliance on emergency care services and identification of feasible alternatives are needed. This study aimed to identify clinician, caregiver, and service providers' views and experiences of unmet needs leading to emergency care use among community-dwelling PwD and alternative ways of addressing these needs. DESIGN: Qualitative, employing semistructured interviews with clinicians, informal caregivers, and aging service providers. SETTING: Wisconsin, United States. PARTICIPANTS: Informal caregivers of PwD (n = 4), emergency medicine physicians (n = 4), primary care physicians (n = 5), geriatric healthcare providers (n = 5), aging service providers (n = 6), and community paramedics (n = 3). MEASUREMENTS: Demographic characteristics of participants and data from semistructured interviews. FINDINGS: Four major themes were identified from interviews: (1) system fragmentation influences emergency care use by PwD, (2) informational, decision-making, and social support needs influence emergency care use by PwD, (3) emergency departments (EDs) are not designed to optimally address PwD and caregiver needs, and (4) options to prevent and address emergency care needs of PwD. CONCLUSION:Participants identified numerous system and individual-level unmet needs and offered many recommendations to prevent or improve ED use by PwD. These novel findings, aggregating the perspectives of multiple dementia-care stakeholder groups, serve as the first step to developing interventions that prevent the need for emergency care or deliver tailored emergency care services to this vulnerable population through new approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:711-718, 2019.
Authors: D Johnston; Q M Samus; A Morrison; J S Leoutsakos; K Hicks; S Handel; R Rye; B Robbins; P V Rabins; C G Lyketsos; B S Black Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2010-07-23 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Katherine S Judge; David M Bass; A Lynn Snow; Nancy L Wilson; Robert Morgan; Wendy J Looman; Catherine McCarthy; Mark E Kunik Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2011-01-17
Authors: Claudia Miranda-Castillo; Bob Woods; Kumari Galboda; Sabu Oomman; Charles Olojugba; Martin Orrell Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Fredric D Wolinsky; Li Liu; Thomas R Miller; Hyonggin An; John F Geweke; Brian Kaskie; Kara B Wright; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Claire E Pavlik; Elizabeth A Cook; Robert L Ohsfeldt; Kelly K Richardson; Gary E Rosenthal; Robert B Wallace Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Sarah Voss; Janet Brandling; Katherine Pollard; Hazel Taylor; Sarah Black; Marina Buswell; Richard Cheston; Sarah Cullum; Theresa Foster; Kim Kirby; Larissa Prothero; Sarah Purdy; Chris Solway; Jonathan Benger Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-01-29
Authors: Rebecca K Green; Manish N Shah; Lindsay R Clark; Robert J Batt; Nathaniel A Chin; Brian W Patterson Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Aaron P Beck; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Matthew Hollander; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Nicole Werner; Manish N Shah Journal: Dementia (London) Date: 2020-02-12