Victoria W Willard1, Kristoffer S Berlin2, Heather M Conklin1, Thomas E Merchant3. 1. Department of Psychology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with brain tumors who are treated with radiation therapy (RT) are at risk for neurocognitive and psychosocial late effects. Research to date has primarily examined these outcomes at a group level and in isolation. Advanced statistical techniques allow for person-centered analyses, as well as examination of relationships between domain-specific trajectories. METHODS: Patients with brain tumors (craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, low-grade astrocytoma, high-grade astrocytoma) were enrolled on a phase II clinical trial of RT. Three hundred and fifty patients completed serial neurocognitive assessments as part of their treatment monitoring, including pre-RT baseline, 6 months post-RT, and then yearly for 5 years. This secondary analysis focused on outcomes of cognition (estimated IQ, parent-reported attention problems) and psychosocial effects (parent-reported socialization and social problems) post-RT. RESULTS: Latent growth curve modeling indicated that estimated IQ and socialization were best served by quadratic models, while attention and social problems were best served by linear models. Growth mixture modeling indicated 3-class models were the best fit for IQ and socialization, and 2-class models for attention and social problems. Baseline IQ and socialization scores were associated, but there was no association over time. Young age at diagnosis and pre-RT treatments (surgery, chemotherapy) were associated with class membership. CONCLUSIONS: Person-centered statistical analyses provide rich information regarding the variability in neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning following RT for pediatric brain tumor. While many patients do well over time, a subset are exhibiting significant cognitive and/or psychosocial deficits. Class membership was associated with some medical factors (eg, pre-radiation surgery/chemotherapy, age at diagnosis, shunted hydrocephalus).
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with brain tumors who are treated with radiation therapy (RT) are at risk for neurocognitive and psychosocial late effects. Research to date has primarily examined these outcomes at a group level and in isolation. Advanced statistical techniques allow for person-centered analyses, as well as examination of relationships between domain-specific trajectories. METHODS:Patients with brain tumors (craniopharyngioma, ependymoma, low-grade astrocytoma, high-grade astrocytoma) were enrolled on a phase II clinical trial of RT. Three hundred and fifty patients completed serial neurocognitive assessments as part of their treatment monitoring, including pre-RT baseline, 6 months post-RT, and then yearly for 5 years. This secondary analysis focused on outcomes of cognition (estimated IQ, parent-reported attention problems) and psychosocial effects (parent-reported socialization and social problems) post-RT. RESULTS: Latent growth curve modeling indicated that estimated IQ and socialization were best served by quadratic models, while attention and social problems were best served by linear models. Growth mixture modeling indicated 3-class models were the best fit for IQ and socialization, and 2-class models for attention and social problems. Baseline IQ and socialization scores were associated, but there was no association over time. Young age at diagnosis and pre-RT treatments (surgery, chemotherapy) were associated with class membership. CONCLUSIONS:Person-centered statistical analyses provide rich information regarding the variability in neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning following RT for pediatric brain tumor. While many patients do well over time, a subset are exhibiting significant cognitive and/or psychosocial deficits. Class membership was associated with some medical factors (eg, pre-radiation surgery/chemotherapy, age at diagnosis, shunted hydrocephalus).
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Erin N Kiehna; Larry E Kun; Raymond K Mulhern; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong; Frederick A Boop; Robert A Sanford Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Yunping Zhu; Stephen J Thompson; Marc R Sontag; Richard L Heideman; Larry E Kun Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong; Larry E Kun; Frederic A Boop; Robert A Sanford Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Brenda J Spiegler; Eric Bouffet; Mark L Greenberg; James T Rutka; Donald J Mabbott Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Melanie J Bonner; Kristina K Hardy; Victoria W Willard; Kelly K Anthony; Maggie Hood; Sridharan Gururangan Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2008-04-05
Authors: Eugenia P Dolson; Heather M Conklin; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong; Thomas E Merchant Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Derek S Tsang; Laurence Kim; Zhihui Amy Liu; Laura Janzen; Mohammad Khandwala; Eric Bouffet; Normand Laperriere; Hitesh Dama; Dana Keilty; Tim Craig; Vijay Ramaswamy; David C Hodgson; Donald Mabbott Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ade Oyefiade; Iris Paltin; Cinzia R De Luca; Kristina K Hardy; David R Grosshans; Murali Chintagumpala; Donald J Mabbott; Lisa S Kahalley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Victoria W Willard; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Haitao Pan; Chia-Wei Hsu; Rachel C Brennan; Matthew W Wilson; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Kristin Goode; Kendra Parris; Sean Phipps Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 50.717