Literature DB >> 30624707

Evaluation of carbon dioxide induction methods for the euthanasia of day-old cull broiler chicks.

B I Baker1, S Torrey2, T M Widowski2, P V Turner3, T D Knezacek1, J Nicholds4, T G Crowe5, K Schwean-Lardner1.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of 5 different CO2 euthanasia induction techniques for day-old cull chicks in minimizing distress and inducing a rapid loss of sensibility and death. Each induction treatment was characterized for concentration change over time, maximum concentration, and time to reach maximum. Sixteen chicks were euthanized with the gradual treatments to establish validity of treatment. Then, all 5 treatments were evaluated for effect on distress, insensibility, and death. Day-of-hatch cull chicks (n = 110) were euthanized in pairs by either immersion into 100% CO2 or gradual induction to 100% CO2 at displacement rates of 7, 14, 21, or 28% of chamber volume added per min (% vol/min). CO2 concentration was measured at chick level. Live focal observations and video recordings were used to assess latency to behavioral responses: head shaking (HS) and gasping (GS) as indicators of distress; loss of posture (LOP) as an indicator of insensibility; and cessation of rhythmic breathing (CRB) and movement (COM), indicating death. All behaviors occurred at the earliest with immersion compared to gradual treatments, and time between first signs of distress and LOP was shorter for immersion than gradual treatments. Gradual treatments showed a linear decrease in latency to HS, GS, and LOP as displacement rate increased. Latency to CRB decreased quadratically with increasing displacement rate, while COM decreased linearly. Within gradual treatments, HS and GS occurred at CO2 concentrations between 0.43 and 1.14%, LOP between 11.1 and 17.5%, while CRB and COM occurred between 61.8 and 78.4%. Overall, immersion induced distress, insensibility, and death significantly faster and with the shortest interval between distress and insensibility. For gradual treatment, insensibility and death occurred faster with increasing displacement rates. Behavioral signs of distress were observed with all treatments, and occurred at concentrations lower than those causing insensibility. In conclusion, immersion into 100% CO2 environment resulted in the shortest time of distress and fastest time to death compared to gradual displacement rates of any speed measured.
© 2019 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cull; disposal; gas inhalation; immersion; welfare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30624707     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Humanely Ending the Life of Animals: Research Priorities to Identify Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Aline R Steiner; Shannon Axiak Flammer; Ngaio J Beausoleil; Charlotte Berg; Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger; Rebeca García Pinillos; Huw D W Golledge; Michael Marahrens; Robert Meyer; Tobias Schnitzer; Michael J Toscano; Patricia V Turner; Daniel M Weary; Thomas C Gent
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Defining characteristics of immersion carbon dioxide gas for successful euthanasia of neonatal and young broilers.

Authors:  B I Baker; S Torrey; T M Widowski; P V Turner; T D Knezacek; J Nicholds; T G Crowe; K Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Deciphering the Forebrain Disorder in a Chicken Model of Cerebral Hernia.

Authors:  Yingfeng Tao; Xiaoliu Zhou; Xinting Zheng; Shijun Li; Chunyan Mou
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  COVID-19 Effects on Livestock Production: A One Welfare Issue.

Authors:  Jeremy N Marchant-Forde; Laura A Boyle
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-09-30

5.  Evaluation of Euthanasia Methods on Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Newly Hatched Male Layer Chicks.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Dan Zhao; Allison C Milby; Gregory S Archer; E David Peebles; Shailesh Gurung; Morgan B Farnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.