Eric A Secemsky1,2,3, Enrico G Ferro2, Sunil V Rao4, Ajay Kirtane5,6, Hector Tamez1,2,3, Pearl Zakroysky4, Daniel Wojdyla4, Steven M Bradley7, David J Cohen8, Robert W Yeh1,2,3. 1. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York. 6. Associate Editor. 7. Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 8. St Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri, Kansas City.
Abstract
Importance: Following negative randomized clinical trials, US guidelines downgraded support for routine manual aspiration thrombectomy (AT) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, some PCI operators continue to endorse a clinical benefit with AT use despite the lack of supportive data. Objective: To examine temporal trends and comparative outcomes of AT use during pPCI for STEMI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry from July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2016, to assess temporal trends and in-hospital outcomes associated with AT use. To evaluate outcomes through 180 days, a subanalysis was conducted among Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked patients from July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2014. The comparative effectiveness analysis was performed using instrumental variable analyses to account for treatment selection bias. The instrumental variable was operator's preference to use AT during pPCI. Data were analyzed between February 1, 2017, and April 1, 2018. Exposures: Aspiration thrombectomy use during pPCI for STEMI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included in-hospital stroke and death. Secondary outcomes included heart failure, stroke, all-cause rehospitalization, and death through 180 days of follow-up. Results: Among all pPCIs performed (683 584), the mean (SD) age of patients was 61.7 (12.8) years, 489 257 were male (71.6%), and 596 384 were white (87.2%). Among patients undergoing pPCI, AT use increased from 2009 through 2011, with peak use of 13.8%. This was followed by a decline of more than 9%, reaching 4.7% by mid-2016. Overall, AT was used in 10.8% of pPCIs (lowest operator group median, 0%; highest operator group median, 33.8%). After instrumental variable analysis, AT use was associated with no difference in in-hospital death (adjusted absolute risk difference, -0.18%; 95% CI, -0.53% to 0.16%; P = .29) and a small increase in in-hospital stroke (adjusted RD, 0.14%; 95% CI, 0.01%-0.30%; P = .03). Among Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked patients, AT use was not associated with differences in death, heart failure, stroke, or rehospitalization at 180 days. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large, nationwide analysis, AT use during STEMI pPCI declined by more than 50% since 2011, with use as of mid-2016 at less than 5%. Selective AT use was associated with a small excess risk of in-hospital stroke and no difference in other outcomes through 180 days of follow-up.
Importance: Following negative randomized clinical trials, US guidelines downgraded support for routine manual aspiration thrombectomy (AT) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, some PCI operators continue to endorse a clinical benefit with AT use despite the lack of supportive data. Objective: To examine temporal trends and comparative outcomes of AT use during pPCI for STEMI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI Registry from July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2016, to assess temporal trends and in-hospital outcomes associated with AT use. To evaluate outcomes through 180 days, a subanalysis was conducted among Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked patients from July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2014. The comparative effectiveness analysis was performed using instrumental variable analyses to account for treatment selection bias. The instrumental variable was operator's preference to use AT during pPCI. Data were analyzed between February 1, 2017, and April 1, 2018. Exposures: Aspiration thrombectomy use during pPCI for STEMI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included in-hospital stroke and death. Secondary outcomes included heart failure, stroke, all-cause rehospitalization, and death through 180 days of follow-up. Results: Among all pPCIs performed (683 584), the mean (SD) age of patients was 61.7 (12.8) years, 489 257 were male (71.6%), and 596 384 were white (87.2%). Among patients undergoing pPCI, AT use increased from 2009 through 2011, with peak use of 13.8%. This was followed by a decline of more than 9%, reaching 4.7% by mid-2016. Overall, AT was used in 10.8% of pPCIs (lowest operator group median, 0%; highest operator group median, 33.8%). After instrumental variable analysis, AT use was associated with no difference in in-hospital death (adjusted absolute risk difference, -0.18%; 95% CI, -0.53% to 0.16%; P = .29) and a small increase in in-hospital stroke (adjusted RD, 0.14%; 95% CI, 0.01%-0.30%; P = .03). Among Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked patients, AT use was not associated with differences in death, heart failure, stroke, or rehospitalization at 180 days. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large, nationwide analysis, AT use during STEMI pPCI declined by more than 50% since 2011, with use as of mid-2016 at less than 5%. Selective AT use was associated with a small excess risk of in-hospital stroke and no difference in other outcomes through 180 days of follow-up.
Authors: Ole Fröbert; Bo Lagerqvist; Göran K Olivecrona; Elmir Omerovic; Thorarinn Gudnason; Michael Maeng; Mikael Aasa; Oskar Angerås; Fredrik Calais; Mikael Danielewicz; David Erlinge; Lars Hellsten; Ulf Jensen; Agneta C Johansson; Amra Kåregren; Johan Nilsson; Lotta Robertson; Lennart Sandhall; Iwar Sjögren; Ollie Ostlund; Jan Harnek; Stefan K James Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thérèse A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David E Wennberg; David A Alter; Daniel J Gottlieb; Marian J Vermeulen Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Neil J Wimmer; Eric A Secemsky; Laura Mauri; Matthew T Roe; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; David Dai; James M McCabe; Frederic S Resnic; Hitinder S Gurm; Robert W Yeh Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: W S Weintraub; C R McKay; R N Riner; S G Ellis; P L Frommer; D B Carmichael; K E Hammermeister; M N Effros; J E Bost; D P Bodycombe Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Akiko Maehara; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Jacek Godlewski; Helen Parise; Jan-Henk E Dambrink; Andrzej Ochala; Trevor W Carlton; Ecaterina Cristea; Steven D Wolff; Sorin J Brener; Saqib Chowdhary; Magdi El-Omar; Thomas Neunteufl; D Christopher Metzger; Theodore Karwoski; Jose M Dizon; Roxana Mehran; C Michael Gibson Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-03-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Pieter J Vlaar; Bart J de Smet; Ad F van den Heuvel; Rutger L Anthonio; Gillian A Jessurun; Eng-Shiong Tan; Hans L Hillege; Felix Zijlstra Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Frederic S Resnic; Marco Wainstein; Michael K Y Lee; Dominik Behrendt; Rodrigo V Wainstein; Lucila Ohno-Machado; James M Kirshenbaum; Campbell D K Rogers; Jeffrey J Popma; Robert Piana Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: M Alan Brookhart; Jeremy A Rassen; Philip S Wang; Colin Dormuth; Helen Mogun; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Dhanuka Perera; Krishnaraj S Rathod; Oliver Guttmann; Anne-Marie Beirne; Constantinos O'Mahony; Roshan Weerackody; Andreas Baumbach; Anthony Mathur; Andrew Wragg; Daniel A Jones Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Neel M Butala; Mabel Chung; Eric A Secemsky; Pratik Manandhar; Guillaume Marquis-Gravel; Andrzej S Kosinski; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Robert W Yeh; David J Cohen Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Rafail A Kotronias; Kirsty Fielding; Charlotte Greenhalgh; Regent Lee; Mohammad Alkhalil; Federico Marin; Maria Emfietzoglou; Adrian P Banning; Claire Vallance; Keith M Channon; Giovanni Luigi De Maria Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-20
Authors: Eric A Secemsky; Neel Butala; Aishwarya Raja; Rohan Khera; Yongfei Wang; Jeptha P Curtis; Thomas M Maddox; Salim S Virani; Ehrin J Armstrong; Kendrick A Shunk; Ralph G Brindis; Deepak Bhatt; Robert W Yeh Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 7.514
Authors: Neel M Butala; Raj Makkar; Eric A Secemsky; Dianne Gallup; Guillaume Marquis-Gravel; Andrzej S Kosinski; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Javier A Valle; Steven M Bradley; Tarun Chakravarty; Robert W Yeh; David J Cohen Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 39.918