| Literature DB >> 30624467 |
Júlia Eick Iglesias1, Lucas Siqueira Pinheiro1, Daniel Eduardo Weibel2, Francisco Montagner1, Fabiana Soares Grecca1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of surfactants 0.2% or 0.1% cetrimide (Cet) or 0.008% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on 2.5% calcium hypochlorite (Ca(OCl)2), and compare to sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), regarding the properties of pH, free chlorine content, surface tension, contact angle, pulp dissolution and antimicrobial activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30624467 PMCID: PMC6322640 DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
pH readings of tested solutions (median, maximum and minimum values)
| Group | pH values (max/min) |
|---|---|
| DW | 7.76 (7.66-8.18) |
| NaOCl | 12.88 (12.86-12.94) |
| NaOCl + 0.2% Cet | 12.72 (12.68-12.76) |
| NaOCl + 0.1% Cet | 12.76 (12.74-12.77) |
| NaOCl + BAK | 11.80 (11.78-11.89) |
| Ca(OCl)2 | 12.65 (12.59-12.66) |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.2% Cet | 11.89 (11.88-11.96) |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.1% Cet | 11.87 (11.84-11.87) |
| Ca(OCl)2 + BAK | 11.77 (11.56-11.80) |
| 0.2% Cet | 7.10 (6.82-7.35) |
| 0.1% Cet | 6.35 (6.29-6.50) |
| BAK | 7.03 (6.75-7.15) |
Avaliable chlorine content (mean±SD)
| Group | Chlorine content |
|---|---|
| NaOCl | 2.93±0.13abc |
| NaOCl + 0.2% Cet | 3.01±0.16ab |
| NaOCl + 0.1% Cet | 3.16±0.19a |
| NaOCl + BAK | 3.24±0.07a |
| Ca(OCl)2 | 2.73±0.08bc |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.2% Cet | 2.77±0.08bc |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.1% Cet | 2.58±0.09c |
| Ca(OCl)2 + BAK | 2.63±0.08c |
Different letters indicate statistical difference between solutions
ANOVA (Tukey post hoc) (p<0.05)
Surface tension measurement in mN/m. (mean±SD)
| Group | Surface tension |
|---|---|
| DW | 52.07±1.13b |
| NaOCl | 46.30±3.94c |
| NaOCl + 0.2% Cet | 33.08±0.07ef |
| NaOCl + 0.1% Cet | 32.85±0.22ef |
| NaOCl + BAK | 30.92±0.24f |
| Ca(OCl)2 | 72.13±1.82a |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.2% Cet | 32.89±0.93ef |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.1% Cet | 33.67±0.85ef |
| Ca(OCl)2 + BAK | 31.86±0.18f |
| 0.2% Cet | 36.99±0.28de |
| 0.1% Cet | 40.85±0.73d |
| BAK | 50.53±2.20bc |
Different letters indicate statistical difference between solutions
ANOVA (Tukey post hoc) (p<0.05)
Figure 1Representative images of solutions contact angle analysis on dentin surfaces (1) DW; (2) NaOCl; (3) Ca(OCl)2; (4) BAK. (A) cervical third; (B) apical third
Contact angle measurement in cervical and apical thirds (median, maximum and minimum values)
| Group | Cervical third | Apical third |
|---|---|---|
| DW | 48.10 (38.14-55.31)ab | 50.58 (49.95-61.07)AB |
| NaOCl | 44.27 (29.16-51.97)ab | 44.63 (40.51-50.57)AB |
| Ca(OCl)2 | 53.17 (43.54-61.82)ab | 52.85 (48.46-64.65)A |
| BAK | 42.58 (28.01-45.32)b | 42.84 (29.29-47.00)B |
Different letters indicate statistical difference between solutions in the same third. Kruskal-Wallis (paired comparison) (p<0.05)
Pulp dissolution test (mean percentage reduction in weight of specimens) (mean±SD)
| Group | Pulp dissolution |
|---|---|
| DW | -40.67 ± 25.24d |
| NaOCl | 88.13±11.39a |
| NaOCl + 0.2% Cet | 83.62±9.83a |
| NaOCl + 0.1% Cet | 84.39±4.73a |
| NaOCl + BAK | 86.47±6.40a |
| Ca(OCl)2 | 39.53±7.23b |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.2% Cet | 40.03±7.23b |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.1% Cet | 40.41±15.54b |
| Ca(OCl)2 + BAK | 38.52±9.72b |
| 0.2% Cet | -4.42 ± 5.02c |
| 0.1% Cet | -12.97 ± 12.27c |
| BAK | -50.65 ± 20.42d |
Different letters indicate statistical difference between solutions
ANOVA (Tukey post hoc) (p<0.05)
Inhibition zone against Enterococcus faecalis (mm) (mean±SD). Ampicilline was the positive control
| Group | Inhibition zone |
|---|---|
| DW | 0.00g |
| NaOCl | 13.76±2.06ef |
| NaOCl + 0.2% Cet | 21.21±1.35b |
| NaOCl + 0.1% Cet | 19.77±4.55bc |
| NaOCl + BAK | 16.69±2.07cde |
| Ca(OCl)2 | 14.23±1.65ef |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.2% Cet | 20.84±1.01b |
| Ca(OCl)2 + 0.1% Cet | 18.40±2.12bcd |
| Ca(OCl)2 + BAK | 16.72±2.79cde |
| 0.2% Cet | 18.50±1.08bcd |
| 0.1% Cet | 16.52±0.98de |
| BAK | 12.18±2.07f |
| Ampiciline | 31.60±0.86a |
Different letters indicate statistical difference between solutions
ANOVA (Tukey post hoc) (p<0.05)