Literature DB >> 30623581

Assessing the utilization of high-resolution 2-field HLA typing in solid organ transplantation.

Yanping Huang1, Anh Dinh1, Steven Heron1, Allison Gasiewski1, Carolina Kneib1, Hilary Mehler1, Michael T Mignogno1, Ryan Morlen1, Larissa Slavich1, Ethan Kentzel1, Edward C Frackelton1, Jamie L Duke1, Deborah Ferriola1, Timothy Mosbruger1, Olga A Timofeeva2, Steven S Geier2, Dimitri Monos1,3.   

Abstract

HLA typing in solid organ transplantation (SOT) is necessary for determining HLA-matching status between donor-recipient pairs and assessing patients' anti-HLA antibody profiles. Histocompatibility has traditionally been evaluated based on serologically defined HLA antigens. The evolution of HLA typing and antibody identification technologies, however, has revealed many limitations with using serologic equivalents for assessing compatibility in SOT. The significant improvements to HLA typing introduced by next-generation sequencing (NGS) require an assessment of the impact of this technology on SOT. We have assessed the role of high-resolution 2-field HLA typing (HR-2F) in SOT by retrospectively evaluating NGS-typed pre- and post-SOT cases. HR-2F typing was highly instructive or necessary in 41% (156/385) of the cases. Several pre- and posttransplant scenarios were identified as being better served by HR-2F typing. Five different categories are presented with specific case examples. The experience of another center (Temple University Hospital) is also included, whereby 21% of the cases required HR-2F typing by Sanger sequencing, as supported by other legacy methods, to properly address posttransplant anti-HLA antibody issues.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; histocompatibility; immunogenetics; major histocompatibility complex (MHC); organ transplantation in general

Year:  2019        PMID: 30623581     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric Kidney Transplantation-Can We Do Better? The Promise and Limitations of Epitope/Eplet Matching.

Authors:  Olga Charnaya; Daniella Levy Erez; Sandra Amaral; Dimitrios S Monos
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.569

2.  The Accuracy of Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotide and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction HLA Typing in Determining the Presence of Pre-Transplant Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Total Eplet Mismatches for Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Nicholas G Larkins; Lloyd D'Orsogna; Anne Taverniti; Ankit Sharma; Aron Chakera; Doris Chan; Anoushka Krishnan; Germaine Wong; Wai H Lim
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 3.  A long road/read to rapid high-resolution HLA typing: The nanopore perspective.

Authors:  Chang Liu
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.211

4.  Comparison of sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe vs next generation sequencing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/B4/B5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1 typing: Toward single-pass high-resolution HLA typing in support of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant programs.

Authors:  Anajane G Smith; Shalini Pereira; Andrés Jaramillo; Scott T Stoll; Faisal M Khan; Noureddine Berka; Ahmed A Mostafa; Marcelo J Pando; Crystal Y Usenko; Maria P Bettinotti; Chul-Woo Pyo; Wyatt C Nelson; Amanda Willis; Medhat Askar; Daniel E Geraghty
Journal:  HLA       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.513

5.  Performance of a multiplexed amplicon-based next-generation sequencing assay for HLA typing.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Brian F Duffy; Eric T Weimer; Maureen C Montgomery; Jo-Ellen Jennemann; Rachel Hill; Donna Phelan; Lindsay Lay; Bijal A Parikh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Utilizing nanopore sequencing technology for the rapid and comprehensive characterization of eleven HLA loci; addressing the need for deceased donor expedited HLA typing.

Authors:  Timothy L Mosbruger; Amalia Dinou; Jamie L Duke; Deborah Ferriola; Hilary Mehler; Ioanna Pagkrati; Georgios Damianos; Eric Mbunwe; Mahdi Sarmady; Ioannis Lyratzakis; Sarah A Tishkoff; Anh Dinh; Dimitri S Monos
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.850

7.  Peptides Derived From Mismatched Paternal Human Leukocyte Antigen Predicted to Be Presented by HLA-DRB1, -DRB3/4/5, -DQ, and -DP Induce Child-Specific Antibodies in Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Matthias Niemann; Benedict M Matern; Eric Spierings; Stefan Schaub; Gideon Hönger
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  On the clinical relevance of using complete high-resolution HLA typing for an accurate interpretation of posttransplant immune-mediated graft outcomes.

Authors:  Maria Meneghini; Anna Perona; Elena Crespo; Frederike Bemelman; Petra Reinke; Ondrej Viklicky; Magali Giral; Eduard Palou; Alba Torija; Laura Donadeu; Edoardo Melilli; Jose Zuñiga; Anett Sefrin; Nils Lachmann; Liu Hu; Petra Hruba; Cécile Guillot-Gueguen; Sophie Brouard; Josep Grinyo; Oriol Bestard
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

9.  The value of high-resolution HLA in the perioperative period of non-sensitized lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ji Zhang; Dong Liu; Caixin Zhang; Min Zhou; Jian Lv; Hongmei Wang; Hang Yang; Li Fan; Bo Wu; Jingyu Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

10.  Clinical importance of extended second field high-resolution HLA genotyping for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Aleksandar Senev; Marie-Paule Emonds; Vicky Van Sandt; Evelyne Lerut; Maarten Coemans; Ben Sprangers; Dirk Kuypers; Maarten Naesens
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 8.086

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.