| Literature DB >> 30623444 |
Marc Carriquí1, Margalida Roig-Oliver1, Timothy J Brodribb2, Rafael Coopman3, Warwick Gill4, Kristiina Mark5, Ülo Niinemets5,6, Alicia V Perera-Castro1, Miquel Ribas-Carbó1, Lawren Sack7, Tiina Tosens5, Mashuri Waite8, Jaume Flexas1.
Abstract
Photosynthesis in bryophytes and lycophytes has received less attention than terrestrial plant groups. In particular, few studies have addressed the nonstomatal diffusion conductance to CO2 gnsd of these plant groups. Their lower photosynthetic rate per leaf mass area at any given nitrogen concentration compared with vascular plants suggested a stronger limitation by CO2 diffusion. We hypothesized that bryophyte and lycophyte photosynthesis is largely limited by low gnsd . Here, we studied CO2 diffusion inside the photosynthetic tissues and its relationships with photosynthesis and anatomical parameters in bryophyte and lycophyte species in Antarctica, Australia, Estonia, Hawaii and Spain. On average, lycophytes and, specially, bryophytes had the lowest photosynthetic rates and nonstomatal diffusion conductance reported for terrestrial plants. These low values are related to their very thick cell walls and their low exposure of chloroplasts to cell perimeter. We conclude that the reason why bryophytes lie at the lower end of the leaf economics spectrum is their strong nonstomatal diffusion conductance limitation to photosynthesis, which is driven by their specific anatomical characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 diffusion; bryophytes; cell wall; chloroplast; lycophytes; nonstomatal diffusion conductance
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30623444 DOI: 10.1111/nph.15675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Phytol ISSN: 0028-646X Impact factor: 10.151