| Literature DB >> 30623249 |
Jin Wang1, Beibei Yang1, Fei Gao1, Pingping Song1, Lei Li2, Yangping Zhang1, Cheng Lu3, M Cynthia Goh4, Yukou Du5.
Abstract
Electrochemical sensors have the high sensitivity, fast response, and simple operation for applications in biological, medical, and chemical detection, but limited by the poor stability and high cost of the electrode materials. In this work, we used PtNi lagged-like nanowire for caffeic acid (CA) electrochemical detection. The removal of outer layer Ni during reaction process contributed to the rehabilitation of active Pt sites at the surface, leading to the excellent electrocatalytic behavior of CA sensing. Carbon-supported PtNi-modified glassy carbon electrode (PtNi/C electrode) showed a broad CA detecting range (from 0.75 to 591.783 μM), a low detection limit (0.5 μM), and excellent stability. The electrode preserved high electrocatalytic performance with 86.98% of the initial oxidation peak current retained after 4000 potential cycles in 0.5 mM caffeic acid solution. It also demonstrates excellent anti-interference capability and is ready for use in the real sample analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Caffeic acid; Electrochemical sensor; PtNi jagged-like nanowires; Stability
Year: 2019 PMID: 30623249 PMCID: PMC6325053 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2839-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1a TEM images, b HAADF-STEM images, and c STEM-EDS elemental mapping of Pt-Ni jagged-like nanowire
Fig. 2The CVs of 0 μg, 0.24 μg, 0.48 μg, and 0.72 μg PtNi/C and 0.48 μg Pt/C-modified GCE in 0.5 mM K3[Fe (CN)6]/ K4[Fe (CN)6] containing 0.1 M KCl (a) and in 0.1 M BR buffer solution (pH = 2.0) containing 0.5 mM CA (b) at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1
Fig. 3DPV of the 0.136 μg PtNi/C-modified electrode in 0.1 M BR buffer solution (pH = 2.0) solution containing different concentrations of CA (a) and the plots of oxidation currents versus the concentration of CA (b)
Fig. 4a The CVs of the 0.48 μg PtNi/C electrode in 0.5 mM CA after various numbers of potential cycles at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. b The oxidation peak current vs number of cycles