| Literature DB >> 30622520 |
Sabine Matallana-Surget1, Johannes Werner2, Ruddy Wattiez3, Karine Lebaron1, Laurent Intertaglia4,5, Callum Regan1, James Morris1, Hanno Teeling6, Manuel Ferrer7, Peter N Golyshin8, Dimitrios Gerogiorgis9, Simon I Reilly8, Philippe Lebaron4,5.
Abstract
Epibacterium mobile BBCC367 is a marine bacterium that is common in coastal areas. It belongs to the Roseobacter clade, a widespread group in pelagic marine ecosystems. Species of the Roseobacter clade are regularly used as models to understand the evolution and physiological adaptability of generalist bacteria. E. mobile BBCC367 comprises two chromosomes and two plasmids. We used gel-free shotgun proteomics to assess its protein expression under 16 different conditions, including stress factors such as elevated temperature, nutrient limitation, high metal concentration, and UVB exposure. Comparison of the different conditions allowed us not only to retrieve almost 70% of the predicted proteins, but also to define three main protein assemblages: 584 essential core proteins, 2,144 facultative accessory proteins and 355 specific unique proteins. While the core proteome mainly exhibited proteins involved in essential functions to sustain life such as DNA, amino acids, carbohydrates, cofactors, vitamins and lipids metabolisms, the accessory and unique proteomes revealed a more specific adaptation with the expression of stress-related proteins, such as DNA repair proteins (accessory proteome), transcription regulators and a significant predominance of transporters (unique proteome). Our study provides insights into how E. mobile BBCC367 adapts to environmental changes and copes with diverse stresses.Entities:
Keywords: Epibacterium mobile; proteogenomic; quantitative proteomics; roseobacter; stress response and adaptation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30622520 PMCID: PMC6308992 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree of closely related species to E. mobile (the identifiers in brackets are IDs from the ribosomal database of full-length 16S sequences).
Growth conditions used for proteogenomics and quantitative proteomics.
| 1 | 1 | MB | 4°C | Exponential phase |
| 2 | 1 | MB | Cold Shock | Exponential phase |
| 3 | 1 | MB | 40°C | Exponential phase |
| 4 | 1 | MB | Heat shock | Exponential phase |
| 5 | 1 | MB | Anaerobic | Early stationary phase |
| 6 | 1 | MB | LSP | Late stationary phase |
| 7 | 1 | MB | vLSP | Very Late stationary phase |
| 8 | 1 | SW | Filtered sea water | Early exponential phase |
| 9 | 1 | MB | T0_MET (control condition) | Early stationary phase |
| 10 | 1 | MB | Cu, 1 mM | Early stationary phase |
| 11 | 1 | MB | Cu, 5 mM | Early stationary phase |
| 12 | 1 | MB | Zn, 1 mM | Early stationary phase |
| 13 | 1 | MB | Co, 1 mM | Early stationary phase |
| 14 | 1 | MB | Ni, 1 mM | Early stationary phase |
| 15 | 1 | MB diluted sea salts | UVB 5 h | Early stationary phase |
| 16 | 1 | MB diluted sea salts | Dark 5 h | Early stationary phase |
| 17 | 3 | ASW | UVB 2 h | Exponential phase |
| 18 | 3 | ASW | DK 2 h | Exponential phase |
MB: Marine broth, ASW: Artificial Sea Water,
Early stationary phase (when culture reached peak growth),
Late and very stationary phase (4 and 10 days, respectively, after the culture reached stationary phase). Gray lines correspond to samples for quantitative proteomics.
Comparison of the theoretical (coding sequences) and expressed proteome.
| Chromosome 1 | 3,073 | 2,227 | 72.5 |
| Chromosome 2 | 1,167 | 686 | 58.7 |
| Plasmid 1 | 125 | 70 | 56.0 |
| Plasmid 2 | 192 | 100 | 52.0 |
| Total | 4,557 | 3,083 | 67.6 |
Figure 2Distribution of proteins into COG categories of the theoretical (gray) and the expressed proteome (black).
Figure 3Distribution of the predicted genes into COGs in 8 different species of Ruegeria and Epibacterium. From the innermost to the outermost circle: R. halocynthiae, R. lacuscaerulensis, E. mobile F1926, R. pomeroyi DSS-3, R. TM1040, R. trichCH4B and our strain E. mobile BBCC367. Shades of green represent predicted genes involved in protein functions (e.g., amino acid transport), shades of red to purple represent predicted genes involved in DNA processes (e.g., DNA repair) and shades of light blue to yellow represent predicted genes involved in energy metabolism processes.
Figure 4Cell diagram showing the main metabolism pathways of E. mobile BBCC367 obtained from the theoretical proteome.
Figure 5Diagram showing the abundance of proteins in each COG in the core proteome, randomly expressed and unique proteomes.
Figure 6Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of the accessory proteome. The heat map is linked by a dendrogram representing clustering of the different experimental treatments (top), and protein expression profiles (side). Color code: Black: protein not identified/Red: protein identified by mass spectrometry.
Figure 7Qualitative visualization (oncoprint) of the accessory proteome. The x-axis represents the identified proteins (red, non-identified proteins in gray), the y-axis the different conditions.
Figure 8Growth curves of E. mobile BBCC367 in presence of different concentration of copper, zinc, nickel and cobalt.
Figure 9Morphotypes of E. mobile BBCC367 in presence of copper.
List of the quantified proteins differentially regulated between the UV stress and Dark control conditions (white: down-regulated proteins/gray: up-regulated proteins).
| L-arabinose-binding periplasmic protein precursor AraF (TC 3.A.1.2.2) | 0.01 | 0.034 | |
| Ornithine cyclodeaminase (EC 4.3.1.12) | 0.02 | 0.008 | |
| FIG01073164: heat shock protein HspQ | 0.04 | 0.003 | |
| Regulatory protein, GntR:Bacterial regulatory protein, GntR | 0.08 | 0.031 | |
| FIG01031704: hypothetical protein | 0.13 | 0.051 | |
| Putative protein-S-isoprenylcysteine methyltransferase | 0.19 | 0.024 | |
| GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase | 0.21 | 0.040 | |
| Chromosome partition protein smc | 0.24 | 0.037 | |
| 5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase (EC 6.3.3.2) | 0.25 | 0.042 | |
| Xanthine dehydrogenase, iron-sulfur cluster and FAD-binding subunit A (1.17.1.4) | 0.30 | 0.009 | |
| SAM-dependent methyltransferase, BioC-like | 0.41 | 0.036 | |
| Biotin-protein ligase (EC 6.3.4.15) | 2.12 | 0.059 | |
| Hypothetical protein | 2.33 | 0.011 | |
| L-carnitine dehydratase/bile acid-inducible protein F (EC 2.8.3.16) | 2.41 | 0.012 | |
| peptidase, M23/M37 family protein | 2.44 | 0.053 | |
| Arginine-tRNA-protein transferase (EC 2.3.2.8) | 2.92 | 0.058 | |
| 2-octaprenyl-6-methoxyphenol hydroxylase (EC 1.14.13.-) | 3.17 | 0.054 | |
| Quinolinate synthetase (EC 2.5.1.72) | 3.84 | 0.024 | |
| NADH-FMN oxidoreductase | 4.68 | 0.051 | |
| SSU ribosomal protein S11p (S14e) | 5.45 | 0.037 | |
| HAD-superfamily hydrolase, subfamily IA, variant 1 family protein | 5.51 | 0.012 | |
| SSU ribosomal protein S5p (S2e) | 6.81 | 0.051 | |
| Hypothetical protein | 6.96 | 0.041 | |
| Putative cytoplasmic protein | 10.36 | 0.022 | |
| DNA-binding response regulator, LuxR family | 11.59 | 0.045 | |
| Transcriptional regulator, GntR family | 12.73 | 0.012 | |
| FIG01030832: hypothetical protein | 14.57 | 0.060 | |
| Blue copper oxidase CueO precursor | 18.97 | 0.024 | |
| 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.31) | 21.68 | 0.004 | |
| bacterial luciferase family protein | 31.69 | 0.005 | |
| Transcriptional regulator, GntR family domain/Aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1) | 95.51 | 0.018 | |
| OsmC-like family protein | 119.46 | 0.039 | |
| Hypothetical protein | 273.83 | 0.006 |
Fold change ratios and p-values were obtained from triplicates.