Literature DB >> 30622020

The shape of personal space.

Heiko Hecht1, Robin Welsch2, Jana Viehoff1, Matthew R Longo3.   

Abstract

The notion of a personal space surrounding one's ego-center is time-honored. However, few attempts have been made to measure the shape of this space. With increasing use of virtual environments, the question has arisen if real-world aspects, such as gender-effects or the shape of personal space, translate to virtual setups. We conducted two experiments, one with real people matched according to body height and level of acquaintance in a large laboratory setting, and one where subjects faced a virtual character, likewise matched to their body height. The first experiment also used a mannequin in place of the second human observer. The second experiment additionally manipulated the perspective of the subject to compare estimates of interpersonal distance between an egocentric and an allocentric perspective (in third-person view). Subjects approached (or were approached) from different angles until a comfortable distance for conversation with a stranger was reached (stop-distance task). Personal space turned out to be rather circular with a radius of about 1 m. Male pairs kept larger distances from one another than female or mixed-gender pairs. All subjects assumed larger distances to the mannequin compared to the real observer. Very comparable distances were preferred to the avatar in the virtual environment. Also, it did not matter whether the subject was engaged in active approach, was approached, or merely adjusted the distance between two avatars. Implications for theories of personal space are discussed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender; Interpersonal distance; Space perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30622020     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  9 in total

1.  A comparative evaluation of the four measurement methods for comfort and reachability distance perceptions.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Lee; Xiaoqing Yu; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-10-18

2.  Interpersonal Distance During Real-Time Social Interaction: Insights From Subjective Experience, Behavior, and Physiology.

Authors:  Leon O H Kroczek; Michael Pfaller; Bastian Lange; Mathias Müller; Andreas Mühlberger
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Sexual attraction modulates interpersonal distance and approach-avoidance movements towards virtual agents in males.

Authors:  Robin Welsch; Christoph von Castell; Martin Rettenberger; Daniel Turner; Heiko Hecht; Peter Fromberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Interpersonal Distance in the SARS-CoV-2 Crisis.

Authors:  Robin Welsch; Heiko Hecht; Lewis Chuang; Christoph von Castell
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  The Interrelation Between Peripersonal Action Space and Interpersonal Social Space: Psychophysiological Evidence and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Yann Coello; Alice Cartaud
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Contextual modulation of preferred social distance during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Chiara Fini; Luca Tummolini; A M Borghi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Face masks reduce interpersonal distance in virtual reality.

Authors:  Leon O H Kroczek; Stephanie Böhme; Andreas Mühlberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Physical distancing and the perception of interpersonal distance in the COVID-19 crisis.

Authors:  Robin Welsch; Marlene Wessels; Christoph Bernhard; Sven Thönes; Christoph von Castell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Psychological and physiological evidence for an initial 'Rough Sketch' calculation of personal space.

Authors:  Roger B H Tootell; Sarah L Zapetis; Baktash Babadi; Zahra Nasiriavanaki; Dylan E Hughes; Kim Mueser; Michael Otto; Ed Pace-Schott; Daphne J Holt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.