Literature DB >> 30621895

Network analyses using case-control data to describe and characterize the initial 2014 incursion of porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) in Canadian swine herds.

Amanda M Perri1, Zvonimir Poljak2, Cate Dewey3, John C S Harding4, Terri L O'Sullivan5.   

Abstract

The overall objective of this study was to describe the contact structure and animal movement patterns of porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) case herds and matched control herds during the initial incursion of PEDV in Canada, and to evaluate possible mechanisms of spread during this period. Possible mechanisms of spread included transmission through a common-source, herd-to-herd transmission, and transmission due to low biosecurity. Three hypotheses were evaluated by assessing: 1) whether feed supplier, semen supplier and/or animal transportation company networks contained a higher proportion of case herds compared to randomly permuted networks, 2) whether the proportion of case herds in the giant weak component differed from randomly permuted networks, and 3) whether external herd biosecurity, defined as the number of mean contacts with other herds in a one-mode network, was different between case and control herds. The study period for recruiting case and control herds was from January 22, 2014 to March 1, 2014, and a 30-day history of each participating site was collected using a questionnaire. The study included swine herds located in central and eastern Canadian provinces. Multiple two-mode networks with swine herds and service suppliers were constructed. This included feed suppliers, animal movement, animal transportation companies, semen suppliers and a complete network with all service providers. The complete network consisted of 145 nodes. There were a total of 765 edges in the complete network and majority were between feed suppliers and primary herds 29.8% (228/765). The proportion of case herds in the largest feed supplier network was higher than what was expected using randomly permuted networks, suggesting that the likely mechanism of spread during this phase was a common-source through the feed network. A single feed supplier (FS1) had the highest out-degree and outgoing contact chain indicating its importance in disease spread throughout the feed and complete networks. Network descriptive measures, as well as the results of the hypotheses testing indicate little significance in the roles of animal movement, animal transportation companies, and semen suppliers during the initial phase of the 2014 Canadian PED outbreak.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; Case-control; Contact movement; Feed suppliers; Network analysis; Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30621895     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Canadian 2014 porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus outbreak: Important risk factors that were not considered in the epidemiological investigation could change the conclusions.

Authors:  Louis E Russell; Javier Polo; David Meeker
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 5.005

2.  An investigation of transportation practices in an Ontario swine system using descriptive network analysis.

Authors:  Dylan John Melmer; Terri L O'Sullivan; Amy L Greer; Zvonimir Poljak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The risk of viral transmission in feed: What do we know, what do we do?

Authors:  Scott A Dee; Megan C Niederwerder; Gil Patterson; Roger Cochrane; Cassie Jones; Diego Diel; Egan Brockhoff; Eric Nelson; Gordon Spronk; Paul Sundberg
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.005

4.  A descriptive study of on-farm biosecurity and management practices during the incursion of porcine epidemic diarrhea into Canadian swine herds, 2014.

Authors:  Amanda M Perri; Zvonimir Poljak; Cate Dewey; John Cs Harding; Terri L O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 5.  Risk and Mitigation of African Swine Fever Virus in Feed.

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.