Literature DB >> 30621760

Assessment of urban microbiome assemblies with the help of targeted in silico gold standards.

Samuel M Gerner1,2, Thomas Rattei2, Alexandra B Graf3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microbial communities play a crucial role in our environment and may influence human health tremendously. Despite being the place where human interaction is most abundant we still know little about the urban microbiome. This is highlighted by the large amount of unclassified DNA reads found in urban metagenome samples. The only in silico approach that allows us to find unknown species, is the assembly and classification of draft genomes from a metagenomic dataset. In this study we (1) investigate the applicability of an assembly and binning approach for urban metagenome datasets, and (2) develop a new method for the generation of in silico gold standards to better understand the specific challenges of such datasets and provide a guide in the selection of available software.
RESULTS: We applied combinations of three assembly (Megahit, SPAdes and MetaSPAdes) and three binning tools (MaxBin, MetaBAT and CONCOCT) to whole genome shotgun datasets from the CAMDA 2017 Challenge. Complex in silico gold standards with a simulated bacterial fraction were generated for representative samples of each surface type and city. Using these gold standards, we found the combination of SPAdes and MetaBAT to be optimal for urban metagenome datasets by providing the best trade-off between the number of high-quality genome draft bins (MIMAG standards) retrieved, the least amount of misassemblies and contamination. The assembled draft genomes included known species like Propionibacterium acnes but also novel species according to respective ANI values.
CONCLUSIONS: In our work, we showed that, even for datasets with high diversity and low sequencing depth from urban environments, assembly and binning-based methods can provide high-quality genome drafts. Of vital importance to retrieve high-quality genome drafts is sequence depth but even more so a high proportion of the bacterial sequence fraction too achieve high coverage for bacterial genomes. In contrast to read-based methods relying on database knowledge, genome-centric methods as applied in this study can provide valuable information about unknown species and strains as well as functional contributions of single community members within a sample. Furthermore, we present a method for the generation of sample-specific highly complex in silico gold standards. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Craig Herbold, Serghei Mangul and Yana Bromberg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assembly; Binning; Bioinformatics; CAMDA challenge; In silico gold standard; Metagenome; Microbiome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30621760     DOI: 10.1186/s13062-018-0225-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Direct        ISSN: 1745-6150            Impact factor:   4.540


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Landscape of Genetic Content in the Gut and Oral Human Microbiome.

Authors:  Braden T Tierney; Zhen Yang; Jacob M Luber; Marc Beaudin; Marsha C Wibowo; Christina Baek; Eleanor Mehlenbacher; Chirag J Patel; Aleksandar D Kostic
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 21.023

2.  Environmental metagenome classification for constructing a microbiome fingerprint.

Authors:  Jolanta Kawulok; Michal Kawulok; Sebastian Deorowicz
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 3.  Liquid biopsies and cancer omics.

Authors:  Ivano Amelio; Riccardo Bertolo; Pierluigi Bove; Oreste Claudio Buonomo; Eleonora Candi; Marcello Chiocchi; Chiara Cipriani; Nicola Di Daniele; Carlo Ganini; Hartmut Juhl; Alessandro Mauriello; Carla Marani; John Marshall; Manuela Montanaro; Giampiero Palmieri; Mauro Piacentini; Giuseppe Sica; Manfredi Tesauro; Valentina Rovella; Giuseppe Tisone; Yufang Shi; Ying Wang; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2020-11-26

4.  Serological determinants of COVID-19.

Authors:  Annalisa Noce; Maria Luisa Santoro; Giulia Marrone; Cartesio D'Agostini; Ivano Amelio; Andrea Duggento; Manfredi Tesauro; Nicola Di Daniele
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of Crohn's disease inflammation and recurrence.

Authors:  L Petagna; A Antonelli; C Ganini; V Bellato; M Campanelli; A Divizia; C Efrati; M Franceschilli; A M Guida; S Ingallinella; F Montagnese; B Sensi; L Siragusa; G S Sica
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 6.  Commensal microbes and p53 in cancer progression.

Authors:  Ivana Celardo; Gerry Melino; Ivano Amelio
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 7.  Cancer predictive studies.

Authors:  Ivano Amelio; Riccardo Bertolo; Pierluigi Bove; Eleonora Candi; Marcello Chiocchi; Chiara Cipriani; Nicola Di Daniele; Carlo Ganini; Hartmut Juhl; Alessandro Mauriello; Carla Marani; John Marshall; Manuela Montanaro; Giampiero Palmieri; Mauro Piacentini; Giuseppe Sica; Manfredi Tesauro; Valentina Rovella; Giuseppe Tisone; Yufang Shi; Ying Wang; Gerry Melino
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Tamock: simulation of habitat-specific benchmark data in metagenomics.

Authors:  Samuel M Gerner; Alexandra B Graf; Thomas Rattei
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.307

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.