| Literature DB >> 30621196 |
Zhiyuan Cheng1,2, Ning Cheng3, Dian Shi4, Xiaoyu Ren5, Ting Gan6, Yana Bai7, Kehu Yang8.
Abstract
Background: Occupational nickel exposure can cause DNA oxidative damage and influence DNA repair. However, the underlying mechanism of nickel-induced high-risk of lung cancer has not been fully understood. Our study aims to evaluate whether the nickel-induced oxidative damage and DNA repair were correlated with the alterations in Smad2 phosphorylation status and Nkx2.1 expression levels, which has been considered as the lung cancer initiation gene.Entities:
Keywords: DNA repair; Nkx2.1; nickel smelters; oxidative stress; pSmad2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30621196 PMCID: PMC6339211 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16010120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Urinary nickel concentrations among different occupational classification groups in Jinchang cohort.
| Gender | Nickel Exposure Level (μg/L Creatinine) |
| Mean (95% CI) | St.d * | Selected Percentiles | Kruskal-Wallis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 95th | H |
| |||||
| Male | Low (Administrative stuff) | 25 | 4.61 (3.27–5.94) | 0.65 | 1.62 | 2.33 | 3.43 | 5.87 | 12.96 | 8.767 | 0.003 |
| Medium (Technician) | 125 | 6.88 (5.28–8.48) | 0.85 | 1.79 | 3.15 | 5.10 | 7.28 | 16.39 | |||
| High (Smelter & Miner) | 101 | 8.75 (7.44–10.05) | 0.66 | 2.08 | 4.43 | 6.56 | 12.23 | 21.32 | |||
| Sum | 251 | 7.40 (6.44–8.37) | 0.51 | 1.79 | 3.24 | 5.27 | 9.12 | 19.13 | |||
| Female | Low (Administrative stuff) | 25 | 6.12 (3.60–8.65) | 1.22 | 2.10 | 3.14 | 4.31 | 6.04 | 24.16 | 0.688 | 0.407 |
| Medium (Technician) | 125 | 7.88 (6.25–9.52) | 2.24 | 2.09 | 3.72 | 6.12 | 8.88 | 20.02 | |||
| High (Smelter & Miner) | 99 | 12.65 (8.99–16.32) | 2.04 | 1.93 | 3.63 | 5.91 | 12.97 | 43.66 | |||
| Sum | 249 | 9.61 (7.90–11.31) | 1.40 | 2.05 | 3.59 | 5.78 | 9.28 | 27.52 | |||
Note: * St.d represents the standard deviation.
Baseline characteristics of the 280 participants.
| Characteristic | Categories | Nickel Smelters | Administrative Officers | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||
| Gender | Male | 140 | 100 | 140 | 100 |
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Age | 20–24 | 2 | 1.4 | 2 | 1.4 |
| 25–29 | 29 | 20.7 | 29 | 20.7 | |
| 30–34 | 26 | 18.6 | 23 | 16.4 | |
| 35–39 | 23 | 16.4 | 26 | 18.6 | |
| 40–44 | 20 | 14.3 | 20 | 14.3 | |
| 45–49 | 20 | 14.3 | 20 | 14.3 | |
| 50–55 | 20 | 14.3 | 20 | 14.3 | |
| Nationality | Han nationality | 138 | 98.6 | 140 | 100 |
| Man nationality | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Other | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Occupation | Cadre | 0 | 0 | 63 | 45 |
| Worker | 140 | 100 | 3 | 2.1 | |
| Technician | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5 | |
| Service | 0 | 0 | 67 | 47.9 | |
| Marital status | Not married | 17 | 12.1 | 21 | 15 |
| Married | 118 | 84.3 | 118 | 84.3 | |
| Other | 5 | 3.6 | 1 | 0.7 | |
| Residence years | <20 | 17 | 12.1 | 32 | 22.9 |
| 20–39 | 100 | 71.4 | 79 | 56.4 | |
| >40 | 23 | 16.4 | 29 | 20.7 | |
| Education status | Primary and below | 4 | 2.9 | 1 | 0.7 |
| Junior high school | 34 | 24.3 | 6 | 4.3 | |
| Senior high school | 52 | 37.1 | 22 | 15.7 | |
| Undergraduate and above | 50 | 35.8 | 111 | 79.3 | |
| Family income (RMB/month/person) | <1000 | 10 | 7.1 | 10 | 7.1 |
| 1000–2000 | 80 | 57.1 | 34 | 24.3 | |
| ≥2000 | 50 | 35.7 | 96 | 68.6 | |
| Cancer family history | Non | 106 | 75.7 | 101 | 72.1 |
| Case | 32 | 22.9 | 38 | 27.1 | |
| Unknown | 2 | 1.4 | 1 | 0.7 | |
Distribution of behavioral factors in nickel smelters and administrative officers.
| Behavioral Factors | Categories | Nickel Smelters | Administrative Officers | Chi-sq * |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||||
| Smoking | Non | 43 | 30.71 | 46 | 32.86 | 0.37 | 0.83 |
| Past | 18 | 12.86 | 15 | 10.71 | |||
| Current | 79 | 56.43 | 79 | 56.43 | |||
| Smoking index | 0–400 | 108 | 77.10 | 120 | 85.70 | 3.4 | 0.07 |
| >400 | 32 | 22.90 | 20 | 14.30 | |||
| Alcohol drinking | Non | 84 | 60.00 | 76 | 53.60 | 1.80 | 0.41 |
| Past | 9 | 6.40 | 7 | 5.00 | |||
| Current | 47 | 33.60 | 58 | 41.40 | |||
| Drinking index | 0 | 85 | 60.71 | 77 | 55.00 | 1.49 | 0.68 |
| <5200 | 32 | 22.86 | 34 | 24.29 | |||
| 5200–10,400 | 10 | 7.14 | 15 | 10.71 | |||
| >10400 | 13 | 9.29 | 14 | 10.00 | |||
| Tea consumption | Non | 42 | 30.00 | 44 | 31.40 | 0.2 | 0.91 |
| Past | 4 | 2.90 | 3 | 2.10 | |||
| Current | 94 | 67.10 | 93 | 66.40 | |||
| Tea index | 0 | 42 | 30.00 | 45 | 32.10 | 1.19 | 0.76 |
| <600 | 55 | 39.30 | 60 | 42.90 | |||
| 600–1200 | 21 | 15.00 | 18 | 12.90 | |||
| >1200 | 22 | 15.70 | 17 | 12.10 | |||
Note: * Chi-sq represents Chi-Square test.
Expression of oxidative damage (MDA) and DNA repair (PARP) in different service length categories between nickel smelters group and administrative officers group.
| Service Length (Years) | MDA (nmol/mL) | PARP (ng/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nickel Smelters | Administrative Officers | Nickel Smelters | Administrative Officers | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| ≤4 | 20 | 11.3668 ± 5.0144 | 20 | 6.1012 ± 3.8763 | 20 | 0.0405 ± 0.0017 | 20 | 0.0402 ± 0.0010 |
| 5–9 | 20 | 13.7679 ± 6.1174 | 20 | 7.5872 ± 4.2609 | 20 | 0.0406 ± 0.0015 | 20 | 0.0398 ± 0.0008 |
| 10–14 | 20 | 14.8466 ± 3.6641 | 20 | 9.6055 ± 5.9680 | 20 | 0.0414 ± 0.0028 | 20 | 0.0402 ± 0.0013 |
| 15–19 | 20 | 16.0179 ± 4.6807 | 20 | 10.8349 ± 4.8698 | 20 | 0.0405 ± 0.0012 | 20 | 0.0401 ± 0.0012 |
| 20–24 | 20 | 17.6983 ± 2.9618 | 20 | 13.7706 ± 5.7772 | 20 | 0.0405 ± 0.0021 | 20 | 0.0394 ± 0.0002 |
| 25–29 | 20 | 17.1786 ± 3.0584 | 20 | 14.5487 ± 4.7357 | 20 | 0.0399 ± 0.0004 | 20 | 0.0397 ± 0.0009 |
| ≥30 | 20 | 21.5776 ± 29.7619 | 20 | 15.0885 ± 8.9044 | 20 | 0.0397 ± 0.0006 | 20 | 0.0396 ± 0.0006 |
| Total | 140 | 16.0648 ± 12.0839 | 140 | 11.0766 ± 6.4684 | 140 | 0.0405 ± 0.0017 | 140 | 0.0398 ± 0.0009 |
| 6.125 | 4.853 | |||||||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 1.47 | 7.644 | 2.217 | 2.255 | |||||
|
| 0.193 | 0 | 0.045 | 0.042 | ||||
| 0.273 | 0.569 | −0.175 | −0.376 | |||||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.039 | <0.001 | ||||
Note: * x represents the mean of MDA concentration. St.d represents the standard deviation.
Figure 1Scatterplot (a) and tendency (b) chart of pSmad2 concentration between nickel smelters and administrative officers at different service length.
Expression of NKx2.1 and pSmad2 in the different service length categories between nickel smelters group and administrative officers group.
| Service Length (Years) | Nkx2.1 (ng/mL) | pSmad2 (nmol/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nickel Smelters | Administrative Officers | Nickel Smelters | Administrative Officers | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| ≤4 | 20 | 14.6062 ± 12.3940 | 20 | 15.4643 ± 7.3406 | 20 | 1.1658 ± 0.8780 | 20 | 0.9929 ± 0.5046 |
| 5–9 | 20 | 16.3074 ± 14.4587 | 20 | 12.0121 ± 7.5392 | 20 | 0.9272 ± 0.9011 | 20 | 0.9149 ± 0.4639 |
| 10–14 | 20 | 21.4685 ± 12.4842 | 20 | 13.0714 ± 8.1059 | 20 | 1.6796 ± 1.0290 | 20 | 0.8335 ± 0.4476 |
| 15–19 | 20 | 26.5803 ± 19.9658 | 20 | 10.1228 ± 7.6858 | 20 | 2.0731 ± 0.9835 | 20 | 0.8448 ± 0.5806 |
| 20–24 | 20 | 26.8712 ± 15.4844 | 20 | 11.4143 ± 6.6340 | 20 | 1.6744 ± 1.0137 | 20 | 0.9429 ± 0.5985 |
| 25–29 | 20 | 23.3837 ± 14.1935 | 20 | 9.8430 ± 8.2613 | 20 | 1.6122 ± 0.8516 | 20 | 0.7739 ± 0.5957 |
| ≥30 | 20 | 25.4599 ± 16.2387 | 20 | 13.198 ± 9.1051 | 20 | 1.4666 ± 1.0241 | 20 | 0.7567 ± 0.4891 |
| Total | 140 | 22.0967 ± 15.5792 | 140 | 12.1608 ± 7.8845 | 140 | 1.5141 ± 0.9988 | 140 | 0.8657 ± 0.5240 |
| −6.123 | −5.845 | |||||||
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||||
| 2.099 | 1.242 | 3.069 | 0.552 | |||||
|
| 0.057 | 0.289 | 0.008 | 0.768 | ||||
| 0.312 | −0.146 | 0.232 | −0.169 | |||||
|
| <0.001 | 0.085 | 0.006 | 0.046 | ||||
Note: * x represents the mean of Nkx2.1 and pSmad2 protein concentration. St.d represents the standard deviation.
Figure 2Scatterplot (a) and tendency (b) chart of Nkx2.1 concentration between nickel smelters and administrative officers at different service length.
Canonical correlations between embryonic lung development gene and potential influence factors in nickel smelters.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Service length | 0.2784 | 0.875 |
| MDA | 0.0369 | 0.1734 |
| 8-OHdG | 0.764 | −0.6255 |
| PARP | 0.5858 | −0.2695 |
| hOGG1 | −0.4531 | −0.0561 |
| Proportion explained by own var % | 28.39 | 25.26 |
|
|
|
|
| Nkx2.1 | 0.9886 | 0.1507 |
| pSmad2 | −0.0083 | 1 |
| Proportion explained by own var % | 48.87 | 51.13 |
|
| 0.518 | 0.033 |
|
| 0.72 | 0.18 |
| Adjusted | 0.709 | 0.124 |
|
| <0.0001 | 0.347 |
Note: χ and η represents the canonical correlation coefficient 1 and 2 for group V and W. R, R2, adjust R represents the probability that Group W correlated with Group V in canonical coefficient 1 and 2. p represents the probability value of different pairs of canonical variables.