| Literature DB >> 30621127 |
Maryam Rezvani1,2, Maria Letizia Manca3, Carla Caddeo4, Elvira Escribano-Ferrer5, Claudia Carbone6, José Esteban Peris7, Iris Usach8, Octavio Diez-Sales9,10, Anna Maria Fadda11, Maria Manconi12.
Abstract
The present study aimed at developing a new vesicular formulation capable of promoting the protective effect of ascorbic acid and tocopherol against intestinal oxidative stress damage, and their efficacy in intestinal wound healing upon oral administration. A pH-dependent copolymer (Eudragit® L100), a water-soluble prebiotic fibre (Nutriose® FM06), a phospholipid mixture (Lipoid S75), and two natural antioxidants (ascorbic acid and tocopherol) were combined to fabricate eudragit-nutriosomes by a simple, solvent-free procedure. The vesicles were spherical and oligolamellar, with some multicompartment structures in Eudragit-nutriosomes, small in size (~100 nm), with highly negative zeta potential. The effect of Eudragit® and Nutriose® on the stability on storage and in simulated gastrointestinal fluids were confirmed by the Turbiscan® technology and in vitro studies, respectively. Eudragit-nutriosomes exhibited a protective effect against H₂O₂-induced oxidative stress, and a proliferative effect in Caco-2 cells, as they provided the closure of the scratched area after 96 h of incubation.Entities:
Keywords: Eudragit; Nutriose; antioxidant; intestinal wound healing; phospholipid vesicles
Year: 2019 PMID: 30621127 PMCID: PMC6358973 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11010013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Representative cryo-TEM images of ascorbic acid and tocopherol co-loaded liposomes (A), nutriosomes (B), and EU-nutriosomes (C).
Average size, polydispersity index (PI), zeta potential (ZP) and entrapment efficiency (EE) of liposomes, nutriosomes and EU-nutriosomes.
| Sample | Size (nm) | PI | ZP (mV) | EE Ascorbic Acid (%) | EE Tocopherol (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | 100 ± 11 | 0.16 | −44 ± 3 | 82 ± 9 | 10 ± 8 |
| Nutriosomes | 111 ± 8 | 0.07 | −42 ± 3 | 74 ± 5 | 12 ± 6 |
| EU-nutriosomes | 114 ± 14 | 0.10 | −46 ± 4 | 76 ± 6 | 13 ± 9 |
Figure 2Evolution of Turbiscan® Stability Index (TSI) for ascorbic acid and tocopherol co-loaded liposomes, nutriosomes and EU-nutriosomes over 30 days at 25 °C (A). Turbiscan® ΔT profiles for ascorbic acid and tocopherol co-loaded liposomes, nutriosomes and EU-nutriosomes over 30 days at 25 °C (B).
Average size, polydispersity index (PI) and zeta potential (ZP) of liposomes, nutriosomes and EU-nutriosomes diluted and incubated at pH 1.2 and pH 7.0, at 37 °C. The measurements were carried out immediately after the dilution (t0) and after 2 h at pH 1.2 (t2h) or 6 h at pH 7.0 (t6h).
| Sample | Time | pH 1.2 | pH 7.0 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (nm ± SD) | PI | ZP (mV ± SD) | Size (nm ± SD) | PI | ZP (mV ± SD) | ||
| Liposomes |
| 210 ± 22 | 0.37 | +11 ± 2 | 123 ± 16 | 0.17 | +6 ± 2 |
|
| 265 ± 24 | 0.50 | +12 ± 2 | 141 ± 16 | 0.23 | +7 ± 2 | |
| Nutriosomes |
| 206 ± 40 | 0.22 | +11 ± 3 | 106 ± 8 | 0.11 | +8 ± 3 |
|
| 363 ± 38 | 0.55 | +12 ± 3 | 112 ± 7 | 0.09 | +7 ± 3 | |
| EU-nutriosomes |
| 153 ± 13 | 0.17 | +6 ± 1 | 109 ± 9 | 0.10 | +7 ± 2 |
|
| 141 ± 16 | 0.23 | +7 ± 1 | 116 ± 11 | 0.11 | +6 ± 2 | |
Figure 3Viability of Caco-2 intestinal cells incubated for 48 h with ascorbic acid and tocopherol in aqueous solution or co-loaded in liposomes, nutriosomes and EU-nutriosomes (A). Data are reported as mean values ± standard deviations of cell viability expressed as the percentage of control cells (100% viability). Antioxidant activity (AA%) of ascorbic acid and tocopherol in aqueous solution or co-loaded in liposomes, nutriosomes and EU-nutriosomes, according to the DPPH assay (B). Viability of Caco-2 cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide in the absence or presence of ascorbic acid and tocopherol in aqueous solution or co-loaded in liposomes, nutriosomes and EU-nutriosomes (C). Data are reported as mean values ± standard deviation of cell viability expressed as the percentage of the negative control (100% viability). *,+ symbols indicate statistically different samples (p < 0.05) vs. hydrogen peroxide-treated cells.
Figure 4Optical microscopy images of wound closure in intestinal Caco-2 cells as a function of the treatment with ascorbic acid and tocopherol solution or vesicular formulations for 24, 48 and 96 h, in comparison with untreated control cells. Cells were observed under a light microscope using a 10× objective.