Literature DB >> 30620985

The Effects of Surgical Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritic Knee on the Rotational Alignment of Femoral Component: Gap Balancing Technique versus Measured Resection Technique.

Chang-Wan Kim1, Chang-Rack Lee1, Heui-Chul Gwak1, Jung-Han Kim1, Yong-Uk Kwon1, Doo-Yeol Kim1.   

Abstract

Few studies have compared the accuracy of femoral component rotation in the measured resection technique according to the preoperative computed tomography (CT) and gap balancing technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in accuracy and outlier incidence of femoral component rotation between gap balancing and measured resection techniques with or without preoperative CT and to evaluate the difference in patellofemoral alignment on simple radiographs and clinical outcomes. In this retrospective study, we evaluated femoral component rotation angle on the clinical and surgical transepicondylar axis (FCRA-cTEA and FCRA-sTEA, respectively), patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar displacement, and patient-reported outcomes in the gap balancing technique (Group 1) and in the measured resection technique without (Group 2) and with (Group 3) preoperative CT. A total of 163 total knee arthoplasty (TKA) replacements were included in this study. Average FCRA-cTEA was -3.4 ± 2.6, -2.8 ± 2.1, and -1.8 ± 2.3 degrees in groups 1 to 3, respectively (p = 0.002). Average FCRA-sTEA was -0.2 ± 2.7, 0.5 ± 2.4, and 1.5 ± 2.1 degrees, respectively (p = 0.001). In an outlier analysis that evaluated femoral component rotation using cTEA as reference, no significant difference was observed between the three groups (40.8, 37.3, and 23.7%, respectively, p = 0.133). When sTEA was used as a reference, groups 1 and 3 showed an outlier incidence of 8.2 and 8.5%, respectively, whereas this incidence was as high as 23.5% in group 2 (p = 0.030). No statistically significant group difference in patellofemoral alignment and patient-reported outcome was observed. In the measured resection technique with preoperative CT, the femoral component was externally rotated approximately 1 degree more than in the gap balancing or measured resection technique without preoperative CT. However, the difference in FCRA among the three techniques was not linked to the difference in patellofemoral alignment or patient-reported outcomes. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30620985     DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  5 in total

1.  Intra- and postoperative assessment of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: an EKA knee expert group clinical review.

Authors:  Paweł Skowronek; Markus Arnold; Christian Starke; Agnieszka Bartyzel; Lukas B Moser; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Application and research progress of robotic-arm in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Maolin Sun; Liu Yang; Rui He
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-07-15

3.  Accuracy of 2D CT-Based Measurements of Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jun Young Park; Hyuck Min Kwon; Byung Woo Cho; Woo Suk Lee; Ick Hwan Yang; Kwan Kyu Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  Is gap balancing superior to measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiang He; Caihong Sun; Jianbing Ma; Jianbing Guo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-29

5.  Satisfactory mid- to long-term outcomes of TKA aligned using conventional instrumentation for flexion gap balancing with minimal soft tissue release.

Authors:  Michel Bercovy; Luc Kerboull; Jacobus H Müller; Mo Saffarini; Frederic Sailhan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.114

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.