Literature DB >> 30620559

Activity-Based Protein Profiling Identifies α-Ketoamides as Inhibitors for Phospholipase A2 Group XVI.

Juan Zhou1, Elliot D Mock1, Andrea Martella1, Vasudev Kantae1,2, Xinyu Di2, Lindsey Burggraaff3, Marc P Baggelaar1, Karol Al-Ayed1, Alexander Bakker1, Bogdan I Florea4, Sebastian H Grimm1, Hans den Dulk1, Chun T Li1, Laura Mulder1, Herman S Overkleeft4, Thomas Hankemeier2, Gerard J P van Westen3, Mario van der Stelt1.   

Abstract

Phospholipase A2, group XVI (PLA2G16) is a thiol hydrolase from the HRASLS family that regulates lipolysis in adipose tissue and has been identified as a host factor enabling the cellular entry of picornaviruses. Chemical tools are essential to visualize and control PLA2G16 activity, but they have not been reported to date. Here, we show that MB064, which is a fluorescent lipase probe, also labels recombinant and endogenously expressed PLA2G16. Competitive activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) using MB064 enabled the discovery of α-ketoamides as the first selective PLA2G16 inhibitors. LEI110 was identified as a potent PLA2G16 inhibitor ( Ki = 20 nM) that reduces cellular arachidonic acid levels and oleic acid-induced lipolysis in human HepG2 cells. Gel-based ABPP and chemical proteomics showed that LEI110 is a selective pan-inhibitor of the HRASLS family of thiol hydrolases (i.e., PLA2G16, HRASLS2, RARRES3 and iNAT). Molecular dynamic simulations of LEI110 in the reported crystal structure of PLA2G16 provided insight in the potential ligand-protein interactions to explain its binding mode. In conclusion, we have developed the first selective inhibitor that can be used to study the cellular role of PLA2G16.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30620559      PMCID: PMC6379856          DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Biol        ISSN: 1554-8929            Impact factor:   5.100


Phospholipase A2, group XVI (PLA2G16), was first isolated in murine fibroblasts as a product of the HRASLS gene family, which also includes the phospholipase/acyltransferases, namely, phospholipid metabolizing enzyme A-C1 (A-C1), HRAS-like suppressor 2 (HRASLS2), Retinoid acid receptor responder protein 3 (RARRES3), and Ca2+-independent N-acyltransferase (iNAT).[1−3] PLA2G16 is an intercellular, single-pass transmembrane thiol hydrolase with a molecular weight of 18 kDa that predominantly hydrolyzes the sn-2 fatty acyl chain of phosphatidylcholine.[4,5] PLA2G16 has a papain-fold motive consisting of three α-helices and five antiparallel β-sheets organized in a circular permutation and a conserved catalytic triad consisting of Cys113, His23, and His35, as determined by X-ray crystallography (PDB code: 4DOT) and site-directed mutagenesis studies.[6−9] PLA2G16 is found in various cell lines (e.g., HepG2)[10,11] and adipose tissue.[12,13] Its expression is induced during adipocyte differentation.[14,15] PLA2G16 regulates lipolysis, and its genetic ablation prevented obesity in mice induced by a high fat diet or leptin deficiency.[16] Recently, PLA2G16 was identified as a host factor for picornaviruses, which cause the common cold, by facilitating viral genome translocation and preventing clearance of the virus in host cells.[17,18] Taken together, these genetic studies highlight the therapeutic potential of PLA2G16. However, to date, there are no PLA2G16 inhibitors reported that can be used as pharmacological tools to validate PLA2G16 as a therapeutic target. Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) is a powerful chemical biological technique that allows efficient lead discovery studies by assessing inhibitor activity and selectivity in complex, native proteomes.[19,20] ABPP makes use of chemical probes that covalently react with the catalytic amino acid in an activity-dependent manner. The activity-based probe (ABP) contains a warhead linked to a fluorophore or biotin reporter tag for fluorescent- or mass-spectrometry-based detection, respectively. Currently, no ABPs have been reported for PLA2G16 that could enable inhibitor discovery. Previously, we have developed and applied the β-lactone-based probe (MB064) as a broad-spectrum probe for the identification of highly potent and selective diacylglycerol lipase inhibitors.[21,22] In addition, MB064 was instrumental in the discovery of the off-target profile of the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor BIA 10–2474 that caused the death of a volunteer in a clinical phase 1 study.[23] The β-lactone is a warhead that covalently reacts with the catalytic serine in many serine hydrolases, forming an acyl-enzyme intermediate. Interestingly, MB064 has also been reported to form thioester bonds with the catalytic cysteine of various enzymes.[24] Here, we report that MB064 labels PLA2G16 in an activity-dependent manner and is able to visualize endogenous PLA2G16 in adipose tissue. Screening of a focused lipase inhibitor library using ABPP and subsequent hit optimization resulted in the identification of α-ketoamide LEI110 as a selective PLA2G16 inhibitor that reduces cellular arachidonic acid levels and oleic acid-induced lipolysis in human HepG2 cells. Previously, we have developed MB064 as an ABP for diacylglycerol lipase-α/β (structure shown in Figure A).[21] MB064 could cross-react with many enzymes that employed a serine or cysteine as a nucleophile,[22] thereby making it an excellent chemical tool to profile inhibitor activity and selectivity on endogenously expressed enzymes in various biological samples. To test whether MB064 could also label PLA2G16, we incubated MB064 with proteomes of transiently overexpressed human PLA2G16-FLAG in human embryonic kidney 293 T (HEK293T) cells, followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and fluorescent scanning. A fluorescent band was observed at the expected MW, which overlapped with a band visualized by the FLAG-tag antibody and was absent in mock-transfected cells (Figure B). The labeling was probe- and protein-concentration-dependent (Figure C) and was optimal at pH 8, which is consistent with previously reported pH dependency of PLA2G16.[14,25] Site-directed mutagenesis of the catalytic Cys113 into alanine or serine abolished or significantly reduced labeling, respectively, whereas its expression was not substantially altered as witnessed by FLAG-tag antibodies (Figure D). Of note, MB064 was also able to cross-react with HRASLS2, RARRES3, and iNAT (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information (SI)). Finally, we tested whether MB064 could also label endogenously expressed PLA2G16. To this end, we incubated MB064 with freshly isolated mouse white adipose tissue (WAT) and brown adipose tissue (BAT) proteomes. A fluorescent band was visualized at the expected MW, which also overlapped with a band observed by PLA2G16 antibodies (Figure E). Taken together, these results demonstrate that MB064 can efficiently label active human PLA2G16 via a covalent bond with Cys113 and visualizes native mouse PLA2G16 in brown and white adipose tissue.
Figure 1

Characterization of MB064 as an ABP for PLA2G16. (A) Chemical structure of probe MB064. (B) ABPP using MB064 with PLA2G16 membrane (mem) or cytosol (cyt) proteome (1 mg mL–1) transiently expressed in HEK293T cells and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-FLAG antibody. (C) ABPP condition optimization for human PLA2G16 cytosol proteome using MB064. For the probe concentration test, 0.5 mg mL–1 protein lysate was used. For the protein concentration test, probe of 500 nM was used. (D) ABPP using MB064 with different hPLA2G16 constructs, and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-FLAG antibody. (E) Labeling of endogenous PLA2G16 in WAT and BAT cytosol proteome by MB064, and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-PLA2G16 antibody (full gels are given in the SI).

Characterization of MB064 as an ABP for PLA2G16. (A) Chemical structure of probe MB064. (B) ABPP using MB064 with PLA2G16 membrane (mem) or cytosol (cyt) proteome (1 mg mL–1) transiently expressed in HEK293T cells and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-FLAG antibody. (C) ABPP condition optimization for human PLA2G16 cytosol proteome using MB064. For the probe concentration test, 0.5 mg mL–1 protein lysate was used. For the protein concentration test, probe of 500 nM was used. (D) ABPP using MB064 with different hPLA2G16 constructs, and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-FLAG antibody. (E) Labeling of endogenous PLA2G16 in WAT and BAT cytosol proteome by MB064, and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-PLA2G16 antibody (full gels are given in the SI). Having identified MB064 as a suitable chemical probe targeting PLA2G16, we set out to screen a small focused library of 50 lipase inhibitors at 10 μM in a competitive ABPP format. This led to discovery of 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-oxo-N-phenethylbutan-amide, an α-ketoamide (compound 1) as a hit that almost completely abolished PLA2G16 labeling at 10 μM (Figure A).
Figure 2

Discovery and biochemical characterization of compound 1. (A) Chemical structure of 1. (B) Dose–response curves for 1 on PLA2G16 (left) and other HRASLS members, HRASLS2, RARRES3, and iNAT (right) measured by competitive ABPP using cytosol proteome prepared from transfected HEK293T cells with probe MB064. Under the curves are the corresponding ABPP gels: concentration-dependent inhibition of 1 against different proteins (n = 3). (C) Dose–response curve of 1 for PLA2G16 (cytosol proteome prepared from PLA2G16 overexpressing HEK293T cells) with the PC-A2 fluorescent substrate assay (n = 3). (D) Selectivity of 1 against MB064 and FP-TAMRA in mouse brain membrane (mem) and cytosol (cyt) proteome. Coomassie was used as a protein loading control. Minus sign (−) indicates control (with DMSO), plus sign (+) indicates with 1 at 10 μM.

Discovery and biochemical characterization of compound 1. (A) Chemical structure of 1. (B) Dose–response curves for 1 on PLA2G16 (left) and other HRASLS members, HRASLS2, RARRES3, and iNAT (right) measured by competitive ABPP using cytosol proteome prepared from transfected HEK293T cells with probe MB064. Under the curves are the corresponding ABPP gels: concentration-dependent inhibition of 1 against different proteins (n = 3). (C) Dose–response curve of 1 for PLA2G16 (cytosol proteome prepared from PLA2G16 overexpressing HEK293T cells) with the PC-A2 fluorescent substrate assay (n = 3). (D) Selectivity of 1 against MB064 and FP-TAMRA in mouse brain membrane (mem) and cytosol (cyt) proteome. Coomassie was used as a protein loading control. Minus sign (−) indicates control (with DMSO), plus sign (+) indicates with 1 at 10 μM. Compound 1 was resynthesized using previously reported procedures (see the Materials and Methods section) and tested in a concentration–response ABPP assay. Compound 1 displayed a half-maximum inhibitory concentration (pIC50 ± SEM) of 6.0 ± 0.1 (n = 3) (Figure B). Furthermore, it demonstrated similar activity on the other proteins of the HRASLS-gene family (HRASLS2, RARRES3, and iNAT) with a pIC50 in the range of 6.0–6.2 (Figure B, Table ). Next, we confirmed the inhibitory activity of compound 1 in a previously reported orthogonal biochemical fluorescence assay that uses the Green/Red Bodipy PC-A2 as a surrogate substrate (with a KM of 7.8 ± 2.2 μM) and cytosol PLA2G16 fraction of HEK293T cells overexpressing human PLA2G16.[8] Compound 1 displayed a K value of 84 nM (95% confidence interval CI: 72–96 nM) (Figure C). α-Ketoamides have previously been reported to inhibit serine hydrolases expressed in the brain.[26−29] To determine the selectivity of compound 1 on endogenously expressed serine hydrolases, we performed a competitive ABPP experiment in mouse brain proteomes using the broad-spectrum serine hydrolase ABPs, fluorophosphonate (FP)-TAMRA, and MB064. Compound 1 (10 μM) did not reduce the labeling of any proteins in mouse brain targeted by FP-TAMRA or MB064 (Figure D). Taken together, these results indicate that α-ketoamide 1 is a selective inhibitor of PLA2G16 and its family members.
Figure 3

Biochemical characterization of LEI110. (A) Chemical structure of LEI110. (B) Dose–response curves of LEI110 against PLA2G16 and other HRASLS family members with probe MB064. (C) Dose–response curve of LEI110 for PLA2G16 with the PC-A2 fluorescent substrate assay. (D) Competitive ABPP of compound 1 and LEI110 against endogenous PLA2G16, using MB064 in the cytosol proteome of mouse WAT and BAT and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-PLA2G16 antibody. Both inhibitors could compete the activity of PLA2G16 at 10 μM. (E) MB108 and FP-biotin based chemoproteomic analysis of serine hydrolase activities in the mouse WAT cytosol proteome treated with LEI110 (10 μM). (F) MB108 and FP-biotin based chemoproteomic analysis of serine hydrolase activities in the mouse BAT cytosol proteome treated with LEI110 (10 μM). (G) In situ treatment of U2OS cells overexpressing PLA2G16 with LEI110 (10 μM, 4 or 8 h) reduced arachidonic acid (AA) levels that were induced by PLA2G16. (H) In situ treatment of HepG2 cells with LEI110 (10 μM, 24 h) reversed the lipid accumulation in the cells induced by oleic acid (OA, 100 μM, 24 h). (I) Structure-guided modeling of 1 and LEI110. Compounds 1 (blue) and LEI110 (orange) in complex with PLA2G16, covalently bound to Cys113. Green dotted lines represent a hydrogen bond, pink and purple represent π-interactions. Data represent mean values ± SEM for at least three replicates. [Legend: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 using the Student’s t-test.]

Table 1

pIC50 ± SEM (n = 3) of Compound 1 and LEI110 against HRASLS Protein Family Members from the ABPP Assay

 pIC50 ± SEM
compoundPLA2G16HRASLS2RARRES3iNAT
16.0 ± 0.16.2 ± 0.16.2 ± 0.16.4 ± 0.1
LEI1107.0 ± 0.16.8 ± 0.16.8 ± 0.17.6 ± 0.1
Biochemical characterization of LEI110. (A) Chemical structure of LEI110. (B) Dose–response curves of LEI110 against PLA2G16 and other HRASLS family members with probe MB064. (C) Dose–response curve of LEI110 for PLA2G16 with the PC-A2 fluorescent substrate assay. (D) Competitive ABPP of compound 1 and LEI110 against endogenous PLA2G16, using MB064 in the cytosol proteome of mouse WAT and BAT and Western blot of the ABPP gel using an anti-PLA2G16 antibody. Both inhibitors could compete the activity of PLA2G16 at 10 μM. (E) MB108 and FP-biotin based chemoproteomic analysis of serine hydrolase activities in the mouse WAT cytosol proteome treated with LEI110 (10 μM). (F) MB108 and FP-biotin based chemoproteomic analysis of serine hydrolase activities in the mouse BAT cytosol proteome treated with LEI110 (10 μM). (G) In situ treatment of U2OS cells overexpressing PLA2G16 with LEI110 (10 μM, 4 or 8 h) reduced arachidonic acid (AA) levels that were induced by PLA2G16. (H) In situ treatment of HepG2 cells with LEI110 (10 μM, 24 h) reversed the lipid accumulation in the cells induced by oleic acid (OA, 100 μM, 24 h). (I) Structure-guided modeling of 1 and LEI110. Compounds 1 (blue) and LEI110 (orange) in complex with PLA2G16, covalently bound to Cys113. Green dotted lines represent a hydrogen bond, pink and purple represent π-interactions. Data represent mean values ± SEM for at least three replicates. [Legend: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 using the Student’s t-test.] To improve the inhibitory activity of 1, a hit optimization program was initiated in which 64 analogues were synthesized (data not shown). This resulted in the discovery of 2-oxo-5-phenyl-N-(4-((5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl)oxy)-phenethyl)pentanamide (LEI110) as a PLA2G16 inhibitor with a 10-fold increased potency (pIC50 = 7.0 ± 0.1), compared to compound 1 in the ABPP-assay (Figures A and 3B). LEI110 was also active on HRASLS2, RARRES3, and iNAT (Figure B, Table ). LEI110 demonstrated a K value of 20 nM (95% CI: 17–24 nM) in the biochemical PLA2G16 assay (Figure C) and was selective over brain serine hydrolases as determined with a gel-based ABPP assay (Figure S7 in the SI). PLA2G16 is endogenously expressed in brown and white adipose tissue, and its activity could be visualized by MB064 (Figure D); therefore, we tested whether compound 1 and LEI110 were able to block PLA2G16 activity in adipose tissue. Indeed, both compounds completely abolished labeling of native PLA2G16 by MB064, whereas the labeling of other proteins in brown and white adipose tissue was not affected (Figure D). The selectivity of LEI110 in adipose tissue was confirmed in a chemical proteomics assay using MB108 (THL-biotin) and FP-biotin, respectively (Figures E and 3F, respectively; see structures in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).[30] Based on its activity and selectivity profile, we decided to test LEI110 in a cellular assay. To this end, we transfected human PLA2G16 in U2OS cells and incubated them with vehicle (DMSO) or LEI110 (10 μM) under serum-free conditions. This led to a time-dependent increase in arachidonic acid, a product of PLA2G16, as determined by targeted lipidomics, which could be almost completely abolished by LEI110 (Figure G). Taken together, these results indicate that LEI110 is a potent, selective, and cell-permeable PLA2G16 inhibitor. Genetic studies have previously demonstrated that PLA2G16 regulates lipolysis;[16,31] therefore, we tested whether LEI110 modulates lipolysis in human hepatocytes. Stimulation of HepG2 cells with oleic acid induces steatosis that eventually results in lipid droplet formation, as visualized by Adipored, and is a widely used in vitro model to study fatty liver diseases.[32,33] Since PLA2G16 activity could not be observed in HepG2 cells using our ABPP method, probably due to its low abundance, we confirmed PLA2G16 mRNA expression in HepG2 cells via qPCR (Table S2 in the SI). Of note, very low mRNA levels for the other HRASLS-gene family members were found. In addition, the selectivity of LEI110 in HepG2 cells was confirmed in a chemical proteomics assay with MB108 and FP-biotin (Figure S8 in the SI). Next, we incubated HepG2 cells with LEI110 (10 μM) before oleic acid treatment and observed a reduction in lipid droplet formation, which indicates that LEI110 modulates lipolysis (Figure H). This is consistent with previous reports showing that PLA2G16 modulates lipid metabolism in HepG2 cells or adipocytes.[16,31] Finally, to gain insight in the molecular interactions of α-ketoamides with PLA2G16, LEI110 and 1 were docked in a PLA2G16 crystal structure (PDB: 4DOT).[6] We envisioned that the electrophilic ketone of LEI110 and 1 could act through a reversible covalent mechanism with the active site Cys113 forming a hemithioacetal adduct, similar to other reported α-ketoamide inhibitors.[34] LEI110 and 1 were thus covalently attached to Cys113 in the enzyme and a molecular dynamics simulation was performed (Figure I). Hydrogen bonding of the oxyanion with His23 was observed in both cases, as well as π–π stacking with Tyr21. The extension of the ketone alkyl chain by one methylene allows for a more optimal π-cation interaction with Arg18 for LEI110, compared to 1. Furthermore, the introduction of the pyridyl moiety in LEI110 enables an additional hydrogen bond with the Tyr21-OH. These docking results provide a potential explanation for the 10-fold increase in activity seen for LEI110. In conclusion, we have applied competitive ABPP using MB064 to discover α-ketoamides as the first selective PLA2G16 inhibitors. LEI110 was identified as a potent PLA2G16 inhibitor (K = 20 nM) that reduces cellular arachidonic acid levels in PLA2G16-overexpressing U2OS cells and oleic acid-induced steatosis in human HepG2 cells. Gel-based ABPP and chemical proteomics showed that LEI110 is a selective pan-inhibitor of the HRASLS-family of thiol hydrolases (i.e., HRASLS2, RARRES3, and iNAT). Molecular dynamic simulations of LEI110 in the reported crystal structure of PLA2G16 provided insight in the potential ligand–protein interactions to explain its binding mode. α-Ketoamides have previously been employed as warheads for the inhibition of hydrolases[35−37] and are incorporated in marketed drugs for the treatment of the viral infection with hepatitis C (e.g., boceprevir);[38,39] therefore, it is anticipated that LEI110 constitutes an excellent starting point for the structure-based drug development of novel molecular therapies for obesity and/or the common cold.

Methods

All methods are described in the Supporting Information.
  36 in total

1.  Activity-based protein profiling: the serine hydrolases.

Authors:  Y Liu; M P Patricelli; B F Cravatt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structural basis for the acyltransferase activity of lecithin:retinol acyltransferase-like proteins.

Authors:  Marcin Golczak; Philip D Kiser; Avery E Sears; David T Lodowski; William S Blaner; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Solution structure of the N-terminal catalytic domain of human H-REV107--a novel circular permutated NlpC/P60 domain.

Authors:  Xiaobai Ren; Jian Lin; Changwen Jin; Bin Xia
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  PLA2G16 represents a switch between entry and clearance of Picornaviridae.

Authors:  Jacqueline Staring; Eleonore von Castelmur; Vincent A Blomen; Lisa G van den Hengel; Markus Brockmann; Jim Baggen; Hendrik Jan Thibaut; Joppe Nieuwenhuis; Hans Janssen; Frank J M van Kuppeveld; Anastassis Perrakis; Jan E Carette; Thijn R Brummelkamp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors: a patent review.

Authors:  Hong C Shen
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.674

6.  Lipid balance in HepG2 cells: active synthesis and impaired mobilization.

Authors:  G F Gibbons; R Khurana; A Odwell; M C Seelaender
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Identification and functional characterization of adipose-specific phospholipase A2 (AdPLA).

Authors:  Robin E Duncan; Eszter Sarkadi-Nagy; Kathy Jaworski; Maryam Ahmadian; Hei Sook Sul
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Silencing of the mouse H-rev107 gene encoding a class II tumor suppressor by CpG methylation.

Authors:  Karim Roder; Maria-Jesus Latasa; Hei Sook Sul
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Structure/function relationships of adipose phospholipase A2 containing a cys-his-his catalytic triad.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Pang; Jian Cao; Linsee Addington; Scott Lovell; Kevin P Battaile; Na Zhang; J L Uma Maheswar Rao; Edward A Dennis; Alexander R Moise
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Oligonol suppresses lipid accumulation and improves insulin resistance in a palmitate-induced in HepG2 hepatocytes as a cellular steatosis model.

Authors:  Jae-Yeo Park; Younghwa Kim; Jee Ae Im; Hyangkyu Lee
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.659

View more
  4 in total

1.  Proteomics for cancer drug design.

Authors:  Amanda Haymond; Justin B Davis; Virginia Espina
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Direct oxidation of N-ynylsulfonamides into N-sulfonyloxoacetamides with DMSO as a nucleophilic oxidant.

Authors:  Jun Dong; Duo Fu; Dongning Sheng; Jiayi Wang; Jiaxi Xu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Structure-Activity Relationship Studies of α-Ketoamides as Inhibitors of the Phospholipase A and Acyltransferase Enzyme Family.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; Elliot D Mock; Karol Al Ayed; Xinyu Di; Vasudev Kantae; Lindsey Burggraaff; Anna F Stevens; Andrea Martella; Florian Mohr; Ming Jiang; Tom van der Wel; Tiemen J Wendel; Tim P Ofman; Yvonne Tran; Nicky de Koster; Gerard J P van Westen; Thomas Hankemeier; Mario van der Stelt
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  Rhinovirus Inhibitors: Including a New Target, the Viral RNA.

Authors:  Antonio Real-Hohn; Dieter Blaas
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 5.048

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.