Peter J McCartney1,2, Hany Eteiba1,2, Annette M Maznyczka1,2, Margaret McEntegart1,2, John P Greenwood3, Douglas F Muir4, Saqib Chowdhary5, Anthony H Gershlick6, Clare Appleby7, James M Cotton8, Andrew Wragg9, Nick Curzen10, Keith G Oldroyd1, Mitchell Lindsay1, J Paul Rocchiccioli1, Aadil Shaukat1, Richard Good1, Stuart Watkins1, Keith Robertson1, Christopher Malkin3, Lynn Martin2, Lynsey Gillespie11, Thomas J Ford1, Mark C Petrie1,2, Peter W Macfarlane12, R Campbell Tait13, Paul Welsh1, Naveed Sattar1, Robin A Weir14, Keith A Fox15, Ian Ford16, Alex McConnachie16, Colin Berry1,2. 1. British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 2. West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, Clydebank, United Kingdom. 3. Leeds University and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom. 4. James Cook University Hospital NHS Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom. 5. South Manchester Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. 6. Leicester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom. 7. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom. 8. Royal Wolverhampton University Hospital NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom. 9. Barts and the London Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 10. University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom. 11. Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 12. Electrocardiography Core Laboratory, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 13. Department of Haematology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 14. University Hospital Hairmyres, East Kilbride, United Kingdom. 15. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. 16. Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Importance: Microvascular obstruction commonly affects patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and is associated with adverse outcomes. Objective: To determine whether a therapeutic strategy involving low-dose intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy with alteplase infused early after coronary reperfusion will reduce microvascular obstruction. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between March 17, 2016, and December 21, 2017, 440 patients presenting at 11 hospitals in the United Kingdom within 6 hours of STEMI due to a proximal-mid-vessel occlusion of a major coronary artery were randomized in a 1:1:1 dose-ranging trial design. Patient follow-up to 3 months was completed on April 12, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with placebo (n = 151), alteplase 10 mg (n = 144), or alteplase 20 mg (n = 145) by manual infusion over 5 to 10 minutes. The intervention was scheduled to occur early during the primary PCI procedure, after reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery and before stent implant. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the amount of microvascular obstruction (% left ventricular mass) demonstrated by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted from days 2 through 7 after enrollment. The primary comparison was the alteplase 20-mg group vs the placebo group; if not significant, the alteplase 10-mg group vs the placebo group was considered a secondary analysis. Results: Recruitment stopped on December 21, 2017, because conditional power for the primary outcome based on a prespecified analysis of the first 267 randomized participants was less than 30% in both treatment groups (futility criterion). Among the 440 patients randomized (mean age, 60.5 years; 15% women), the primary end point was achieved in 396 patients (90%), 17 (3.9%) withdrew, and all others were followed up to 3 months. In the primary analysis, the mean microvascular obstruction did not differ between the 20-mg alteplase and placebo groups (3.5% vs 2.3%; estimated difference, 1.16%; 95% CI, -0.08% to 2.41%; P = .32) nor in the analysis of 10-mg alteplase vs placebo groups (2.6% vs 2.3%; estimated difference, 0.29%; 95% CI, -0.76% to 1.35%; P = .74). Major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal MI, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure) occurred in 15 patients (10.1%) in the placebo group, 18 (12.9%) in the 10-mg alteplase group, and 12 (8.2%) in the 20-mg alteplase group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute STEMI presenting within 6 hours of symptoms, adjunctive low-dose intracoronary alteplase given during the primary percutaneous intervention did not reduce microvascular obstruction. The study findings do not support this treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02257294.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Microvascular obstruction commonly affects patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and is associated with adverse outcomes. Objective: To determine whether a therapeutic strategy involving low-dose intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy with alteplase infused early after coronary reperfusion will reduce microvascular obstruction. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between March 17, 2016, and December 21, 2017, 440 patients presenting at 11 hospitals in the United Kingdom within 6 hours of STEMI due to a proximal-mid-vessel occlusion of a major coronary artery were randomized in a 1:1:1 dose-ranging trial design. Patient follow-up to 3 months was completed on April 12, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with placebo (n = 151), alteplase 10 mg (n = 144), or alteplase 20 mg (n = 145) by manual infusion over 5 to 10 minutes. The intervention was scheduled to occur early during the primary PCI procedure, after reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery and before stent implant. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the amount of microvascular obstruction (% left ventricular mass) demonstrated by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted from days 2 through 7 after enrollment. The primary comparison was the alteplase 20-mg group vs the placebo group; if not significant, the alteplase 10-mg group vs the placebo group was considered a secondary analysis. Results: Recruitment stopped on December 21, 2017, because conditional power for the primary outcome based on a prespecified analysis of the first 267 randomized participants was less than 30% in both treatment groups (futility criterion). Among the 440 patients randomized (mean age, 60.5 years; 15% women), the primary end point was achieved in 396 patients (90%), 17 (3.9%) withdrew, and all others were followed up to 3 months. In the primary analysis, the mean microvascular obstruction did not differ between the 20-mg alteplase and placebo groups (3.5% vs 2.3%; estimated difference, 1.16%; 95% CI, -0.08% to 2.41%; P = .32) nor in the analysis of 10-mg alteplase vs placebo groups (2.6% vs 2.3%; estimated difference, 0.29%; 95% CI, -0.76% to 1.35%; P = .74). Major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal MI, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure) occurred in 15 patients (10.1%) in the placebo group, 18 (12.9%) in the 10-mg alteplase group, and 12 (8.2%) in the 20-mg alteplase group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute STEMI presenting within 6 hours of symptoms, adjunctive low-dose intracoronary alteplase given during the primary percutaneous intervention did not reduce microvascular obstruction. The study findings do not support this treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02257294.
Authors: Stephen G Ellis; Michal Tendera; Mark A de Belder; Ad J van Boven; Petr Widimsky; Luc Janssens; H R Andersen; Amadeo Betriu; Stefano Savonitto; Jerzy Adamus; Jan Z Peruga; Maciej Kosmider; Olivier Katz; Thomas Neunteufl; Julia Jorgova; Maria Dorobantu; Liliana Grinfeld; Paul Armstrong; Bruce R Brodie; Howard C Herrmann; Gilles Montalescot; Franz-Josef Neumann; Mark B Effron; Elliot S Barnathan; Eric J Topol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Roxana Mehran; Sunil V Rao; Deepak L Bhatt; C Michael Gibson; Adriano Caixeta; John Eikelboom; Sanjay Kaul; Stephen D Wiviott; Venu Menon; Eugenia Nikolsky; Victor Serebruany; Marco Valgimigli; Pascal Vranckx; David Taggart; Joseph F Sabik; Donald E Cutlip; Mitchell W Krucoff; E Magnus Ohman; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Harvey White Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jaroslaw Zalewski; Kris Bogaerts; Walter Desmet; Peter Sinnaeve; Peter Berger; Cindy Grines; Thierry Danays; Paul Armstrong; Frans Van de Werf Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Murat Sezer; Hüseyin Oflaz; Taner Gören; Irem Okçular; Berrin Umman; Yilmaz Nişanci; Ahmet Kaya Bilge; Yasemin Sanli; Mehmet Meriç; Sabahattin Umman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert S Schwartz; Allen Burke; Andrew Farb; David Kaye; John R Lesser; Timothy D Henry; Renu Virmani Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J P S Henriques; F Zijlstra; J P Ottervanger; M-J de Boer; A W J van 't Hof; J C A Hoorntje; H Suryapranata Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Murat Sezer; Javier Escaned; Christopher J Broyd; Berrin Umman; Zehra Bugra; Ilke Ozcan; Mehmet Rasih Sonsoz; Alp Ozcan; Adem Atici; Emre Aslanger; Z Irem Sezer; Justin E Davies; Niels van Royen; Sabahattin Umman Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Roberto Scarsini; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian Banning Journal: Interv Cardiol Date: 2020-06-04
Authors: Peter J McCartney; Annette M Maznyczka; Hany Eteiba; Margaret McEntegart; Keith G Oldroyd; John P Greenwood; Neil Maredia; Matthias Schmitt; Gerry P McCann; Timothy Fairbairn; Elisa McAlindon; Campbell Tait; Paul Welsh; Naveed Sattar; Vanessa Orchard; David Corcoran; Thomas J Ford; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Ian Ford; Alex McConnachie; Colin Berry Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 24.094