Literature DB >> 30620207

Variation in prostate surgery costs and outcomes in the USA: robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy.

Kumar Mukherjee1, Khalid M Kamal2.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare perioperative complications, inpatient cost and length of stay between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) using National Inpatient Sample data from 2010 to 2015. PATIENTS &
METHODS: A total of 69,009 records with RARP or ORP were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and generalized linear models.
RESULTS: The RARP had superior perioperative outcomes at a higher cost (adjusted mean difference = 2956; 95% CI: $2822-$3090) and shorter length of stay (mean difference = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.89) compared with ORP. Mean cost of RARP was lowest in urban teaching, private invest-own, high volume and northeast region hospitals and highest for black men.
CONCLUSION: Compared with ORP, RARP had significantly better perioperative outcomes at a higher cost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Inpatient Sample; comparative effectiveness; cost disparity; costs; length of stay; open radical prostatectomy; operative outcomes; prostate cancer; robot-assisted prostatectomy; treatment cost

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30620207     DOI: 10.2217/cer-2018-0109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  4 in total

Review 1.  Influence of steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Satoshi Katayama; Keiichiro Mori; Benjamin Pradere; Takafumi Yanagisawa; Hadi Mostafaei; Fahad Quhal; Reza Sari Motlagh; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Nico C Grossmann; Pawel Rajwa; Abdulmajeed Aydh; Frederik König; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Motoo Araki; Yasutomo Nasu; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-12-31

2.  Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Lenart; Ingrid Berger; Judith Böhler; Reinhard Böhm; Georg Gutjahr; Nikolaus Hartig; Daniel Koller; Michael Lamche; Stephan Madersbacher; Michael Stolzlechner; Claudia Elisa Wayand; Anton Ponholzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A novel "three-port" trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ben Xu; Yi-Ji Peng; Guo-Zhong Ma; Qian Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 4.  Measuring Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Graham R Hale; Mohammed Shahait; David I Lee; Daniel J Lee; Ryan W Dobbs
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.