| Literature DB >> 30619901 |
Miranda R Bertram1,2, Carla Bravo de Rueda1,2, Rebecca Garabed3, Simon Dickmu Jumbo4, Mark Moritz5, Steven Pauszek1, Souley Abdoulkadiri4, Luis L Rodriguez1, Jonathan Arzt1.
Abstract
Transboundary movement of animals is an important mechanism for foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) spread in endemic regions, such as Cameroon. Several transboundary animal trade routes cross the Far North Region of Cameroon, and cattle moved on foot along these routes often come in contact with native (sedentary and transhumant) herds. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of transboundary trade cattle in the epidemiology of FMDV in the Far North Region of Cameroon. A total of 582 oropharyngeal fluid (OPF) samples were collected from asymptomatic transboundary trade cattle at official border check points and 57 vesicle epithelial tissues were collected from clinically affected native cattle in the Far North Region of Cameroon during 2010-2014. Viral protein 1 (VP1) coding sequences were obtained from 6 OPF samples from transboundary cattle (4 serotype O, 2 serotype SAT2) and 19 epithelial tissue samples from native cattle (7 serotype O, 3 serotype SAT2, 9 serotype A). FMDV serotype O viruses belonged to two topotypes (East Africa-3 and West Africa), and phylogenetic analyses suggested a pattern of continuous transmission in the region. Serotype SAT2 viruses belonged to a single topotype (VII), and phylogenetic analysis suggested a pattern of repeated introductions of different SAT2 lineages in the region. Serotype A viruses belonged to topotype AFRICA/G-IV, and the pattern of transmission was unclear. Spearman rank correlation analysis of VP1 coding sequences obtained in this study from transboundary and native cattle showed a positive correlation between genetic distance and time for serotype O (ρ = 0.71, p = 0.003) and between genetic distance and geographic distance for serotype SAT2 (ρ = 0.54, p = 0.1). These data suggest that transboundary trade cattle participate in the transmission of FMDV in the Far North Region of Cameroon, however the dynamics and direction of transmission could not be determined in this study. Results of this study contribute to the understanding of transboundary FMDV epidemiology in Central Africa and will help to inform control programs in Cameroon and in the region.Entities:
Keywords: Cameroon; FMDV; cattle; epidemiology; foot-and-mouth disease; transboundary
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619901 PMCID: PMC6301994 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Sampling locations in the Far North Region of Cameroon. Transboundary checkpoints are indicated in black, and locations of native herds with FMD outbreaks are indicated in green. Additionally, FMDV-negative sedentary herds are indicated in blue. Locations of FMDV-negative transhumant herds are not shown because these herds move throughout the region. The usual transhumant routes for these herds are available at MoveBank (https://www.datarepository.movebank.org/handle/10255/move.723). Maroua, the capital of the Far North, is indicated at the star. Inset: location of the Far North Region within Cameroon.
Figure 2Numbers of cattle passing through 4 different border checkpoints in the Far North, Cameroon by month for (A) 2012 and (B) 2013. Verified FMD outbreaks are indicated with arrows. FMD outbreaks were verified by viral genomic sequencing of RNA from vesicle epithelium samples collected from clinically ill animals.
FMDV virus isolation and rRT-PCR results from the transboundary (subclinical) and native (clinical) cattle samples.
| Transboundary | Probang in VTM | 355 | 2 (0.6%) | 24 (6.8%) | 5 |
| Transboundary | Probang in RNAlater® | 227 | NA | 18 (7.9%) | 1 |
| Native | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 57 | 17 (29.8%) | 40 (70.2%) | 19 |
Sequences were obtained from all 19 virus isolates and 6 additional unpassaged samples.
Sample information and accession numbers for VP1 sequences obtained in this study.
| Transboundary trade cattle | G3836 | O/CAR/G3836/2012 | Probang in VTM | 20-Mar-12 | Pouss | 38.27 | Pos | O | |
| G4765 | O/CAR/G4765/2013 | Probang in VTM | 30-Jul-13 | Pétté | >40.00 | Pos | O | ||
| G4848 | O/CAR/G4848/2013 | Probang in VTM | 6-Sep-13 | Kousseri | 34.45 | Neg | O | ||
| G4849 | O/CAR/G4849/2013 | Probang in VTM | 6-Sep-13 | Kousseri | 35.23 | Neg | O | ||
| G3808 | SAT2/CAR/G3808/2012 | Probang in VTM | 6-Mar-12 | Kousseri | 35.6 | Neg | SAT 2 | ||
| B01070 | SAT2/CAR/B001070/2012 | Probang in RNA Later® | 6-Mar-12 | Kousseri | 27.65 | NA | SAT 2 | ||
| Native (sedentary and transhumant) cattle | LAN4 | A/CAR/LAN4/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 13.09 | Pos | A | |
| LAN9 | A/CAR/LAN9/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 15.10 | Pos | A | ||
| LAN10 | A/CAR/LAN10/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 15.05 | Pos | A | ||
| LAN11 | A/CAR/LAN11/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 15.74 | Pos | A | ||
| LAN12 | A/CAR/LAN12/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 19.23 | Pos | A | ||
| LAN14 | A/CAR/14/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 15.16 | Pos | A | ||
| LAN15 | A/CAR/LAN15/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 14.83 | Pos | A | ||
| LAN16 | A/CAR/LAN16/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 17.88 | Pos | A | ||
| LAN17 | A/CAR/LAN17/2014 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 30-Jan-14 | Sifna | 22.13 | Pos | A | ||
| G3856 | O/CAR/G3856/2012 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 27-Mar-12 | Yolde Nagge | 15.07 | Pos | O | ||
| G3857 | O/CAR/G3857/2012 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 27-Mar-12 | Yolde Nagge | 13.95 | Pos | O | ||
| G4250 | O/CAR/G4250/2013 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 10-Jan-13 | Louga Banana | 34.81 | Pos | O | ||
| G4258 | O/CAR/G4258/2013 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 10-Jan-13 | Louga Banana | 18.64 | Pos | O | ||
| G4260 | O/CAR/G4260/2013 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 10-Jan-13 | Lugga Banana | 31.94 | Pos | O | ||
| G4262 | O/CAR/G4262/2013 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 10-Jan-13 | Lugga Banana | 16.99 | Neg | O | ||
| G4268 | O/CAR/G4268/2013 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 10-Jan-13 | Joldugga | 23.96 | Neg | O | ||
| G3796 | SAT2/CAR/G3796/2012 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 26-Feb-12 | Misde | 14.76 | Pos | SAT2 | ||
| G3852 | SAT2/CAR/G3852/2012 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 26-Mar-12 | Djiddel | 15.48 | Pos | SAT2 | ||
| G3853 | SAT2/CAR/G3853/2012 | Vesicle epithelium in VTM | 26-Mar-12 | Djiddel | 15.13 | Pos | SAT2 |
Figure 3VP1 phylogenetic tree for serotype O inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the GTR+G+I model. Branch lengths indicate the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values >50% are indicated at the nodes. The type of herd (transboundary, native sedentary, native transhumant) from which the samples were collected is indicated by the symbol, and unique herds are indicated by the color of the symbol.
Figure 4VP1 phylogenetic tree for serotype SAT2 inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the GTR+G+I model. Branch lengths indicate the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values >50% are indicated at the nodes. The type of herd (transboundary, native sedentary, native transhumant) from which the samples were collected is indicated by the symbol, and unique herds are indicated by the color of the symbol.
Figure 5VP1 phylogenetic tree for serotype A inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the GTR+G+I model. Branch lengths indicate the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values >50% are indicated at the nodes. The type of herd (transboundary, native sedentary, native transhumant) from which the samples were collected is indicated by the symbol, and unique herds are indicated by the color of the symbol.
Genetic, geographic, and temporal distance between pairs of sequences from transboundary and native (in bold) cattle.
| FMDV serotype O | ID G4848 | ID G4849 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.00 | 0 | 0 | |||
| ID G3836 | 0.01 | 60 | 0.3 | ||
| ID G3836 | 0.01 | 60 | 0.3 | ||
| ID G4848 | ID G4765 | 0.01 | 135 | 1.6 | |
| ID G4849 | ID G4765 | 0.01 | 135 | 1.6 | |
| ID G3836 | ID G4848 | 0.02 | 134 | 17.9 | |
| ID G3836 | ID G4849 | 0.02 | 134 | 17.9 | |
| ID G3836 | ID G4765 | 0.03 | 0 | 16.3 | |
| ID G4765 | 0.03 | 60 | 16 | ||
| ID G4765 | 0.03 | 60 | 16 | ||
| ID G4848 | 0.03 | 137 | 17.6 | ||
| ID G4849 | 0.03 | 137 | 17.6 | ||
| ID G4848 | 0.03 | 137 | 17.6 | ||
| ID G4849 | 0.03 | 137 | 17.6 | ||
| FMDV serotype SAT2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.01 | 55 | 1 | |||
| 0.01 | 55 | 1 | |||
| ID G3808 | 0.01 | 86 | 0.3 | ||
| ID G3808 | 0.01 | 140 | 0.7 | ||
| ID G3808 | 0.01 | 140 | 0.7 | ||
| ID B01070 | ID G3808 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | |
| ID B01070 | 0.02 | 86 | 0.3 | ||
| ID B01070 | 0.02 | 140 | 0.7 | ||
| ID B01070 | 0.02 | 140 | 0.7 | ||