| Literature DB >> 30619828 |
Abstract
The design and development of metallosupramolecular systems has resulted in construction of a myriad of fascinating structures with highly diverse properties and potential applications. Assessment of the biomedical applications of metallosupramolecular assemblies is an emerging field of research that stems from the recently demonstrated promising results on such systems. After the pioneering works of Therrien and coworkers on organometallic Ru-cages with promising anticancer properties, this topic has evolved to the more recent studies on bioactivity of supramolecular coordination complexes built from different metal ions and various multidentate ligands. Sufficient amount of data on the anticancer activity of metallosupramolecules has already been reported and allows outlining some general tendencies in the structural aspects of the biological activity. The main structural properties of the complexes that can be readily modified to enhance their activity are the size, the shape and charge of the formed complexes. Moreover, the intrinsic properties of the building components could predetermine some of the main characteristics of the overall supramolecular complex, such as its optical properties, chemical reactivity, solubility, etc., and could, thereby, define the areas of its biomedical applications. The unique structural property of most of the metallosupramolecular assemblies, however, is the presence of a discrete cavity that renders a whole range of additional applications resulting from specific host-guest interactions. The encapsulations of small bioactive or fluorescent molecules have been employed for delivery or recognition purposes in many examples. On the other hand, metallosupramolecules have been imbedded into target-specific polymeric nanoparticles that resulted in a successful combination of their therapeutic and diagnostic properties, making them promising for theranostic application in cancer treatment. The aim of this review paper is to mark out some key tendencies in the reported metallosupramolecular structures in relation with their biological activity and potential areas of biomedical application. In this way, a useful set of guidelines can be delineated to help synthetic chemists broaden the application areas of their supramolecular systems by few structural changes.Entities:
Keywords: anticancer; capsule; encapsulation; metallacage; metallacycle
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619828 PMCID: PMC6302020 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Metallosupramolecular rhomboids and triangles based on cis-blocked Pt(II) and Pd(II) corners and bent shaped or linear donors.
Cytotoxicity data of selected metallacycles against a panel of human cancer cells.
| 19.24 ± 7.13 μM (96 h)/SISO (0.24 ± 0.05/CDDP) | 3.12 ± 1.22 μM (96 h)/A-427 (1.27 ± 0.25/CDDP) | 9.47 ± 3.12 μM (96 h)/LCLC-103H (1.09 ± 0.40/CDDP) | 7.61 ± 6.65 μM (96 h)/5637 (0.37 ± 0.08/CDDP) | Microtitre assay (Terenzi et al., | |
| 37.8 ± 3.3 μM (72 h)/U2OS (3.8 ± 3.0/CDDP) | >50 μM (72 h)/VM-1 (4.43 ± 0.05/CDDP) | 32.1 ± 7.4 μM (72 h)/MCF7 (6.7 ± 0.3/CDDP) | Domarco et al., | ||
| 28.9 ± 4.1 μM (72 h)/U2OS (3.8 ± 3.0/CDDP) | 31.8 ± 0.5 μM (72 h)/VM-1 (4.43 ± 0.05/CDDP) | 39.4 ± 3.4 μM (72 h)/MCF7 (6.7 ± 0.3/CDDP) | Domarco et al., | ||
| 42.3 ± 4.6 μM (72 h)/U2OS (3.8 ± 3.0/CDDP) | >50 μM (72 h)/VM-1 (4.43 ± 0.05/CDDP) | 39.6 ± 4.5 μM (72 h)/MCF7 (6.7 ± 0.3/CDDP) | Domarco et al., |
Cytotoxicity data of selected metallacycles against a panel of human cancer cells.
| 3.60 ± 0.21 μM (24 h)/HeLa (0.81 ± 0.08/CDDP) | Zhou et al., | ||
| 1.76 ± 0.14 μM (24 h) HeLa (0.81 ± 0.08/CDDP) | 14.2 μM (24 h)/A2780cis (12.9/CDDP) | Zhou et al., | |
| 2.11 ± 0.17 μM (24 h) HeLa (0.81 ± 0.08/CDDP) | 18.1 μM (24 h)/A2780cis (12.9/CDDP) | Zhou et al., | |
| 6.41 ± 0.38 μM (24 h) HeLa (0.81 ± 0.08/CDDP) | Zhou et al., | ||
| 0.37 μM ( | 0.76 μM ( | Zhou et al., | |
| 0.95 μM ( | Zhou et al., | ||
| 4.88 μM ( | 6.09 μM ( | Zhou et al., | |
| 4.96 ± 0.17 μM (48 h)/U87 (6.06 ± 0.12/CDDP) | 16.71 ± 0.33 μM (48 h)/ | Gupta et al., | |
| 3.43 ± 0.09 μM (48 h)/U87 (6.06 ± 0.12/CDDP) | 9.16 ± 0.40 μM (48 h)/ | Gupta et al., | |
| 3.73 ± 0.02 μM (48 h)/U87 (6.06 ± 0.12/CDDP) | 8.01 ± 0.19 μM (48 h)/ | Gupta et al., | |
| 6.39 ± 0.28 μM (48 h)/U87 (6.06 ± 0.12/CDDP) | 15.54 ± 0.22 μM (48 h)/ | Gupta et al., |
Cell types given in bold are normal non-cancerous cells.
Irradiation by light (400–700 nm, 50 mW/cm.
Figure 2Metallacycles built from organoplatinum(II) acceptors and bent shaped ligands.
Cytotoxicity data of selected metallacycles against a panel of human cancer cells.
| 20.0 ± 0.2 μM(48 h)/A549 (25.0 ± 0.3/CDDP) | 05.0 ± 0.2 μM(48 h)/MCF7 (20.0 ± 0.3/CDDP) | 16.0 ± 0.4 μM(48 h)/KB (8.0 ± 0.4/CDDP) | 16.0 ± 0.5 μM(48 h)/HaCaT (12.0 ± 0.3/CDDP) | Bhowmick et al., | |
| 19.4 ± 0.5 μM HT-29 (1-10/CDDP) | 9.1 ± 0.1 μM MCF-7 (1-10/CDDP) | 9.6 ± 0.9 μM MDA-MB-231 (1-10/CDDP) | 10.4 ± 0.2 μM | Jana et al., | |
| >30.0 μM (48 h)/A549 (25.0 ± 0.3/CDDP) | 17.0 ± 0.3 μM(48 h)/MCF7 (20.0 ± 0.3/CDDP) | 20.0 ± 0.1 μM(48 h)/KB (8.0 ± 0.4/CDDP) | 20.0 ± 0.1 μM(48 h)/HaCaT (12.0 ± 0.3/CDDP) | Bhowmick et al., | |
| 21.54 ± 3.2 μM (48 h)/A549 (22.38 ± 2.9 /CDDP) | 14.28 ± 1.2 μM(48 h)/HepG2 (18.89 ± 2.1 /CDDP) | 19.55 ± 2.5 μM(48 h)/HeLa (10.21 ± 1.9/CDDP) | Jana et al., | ||
| 10.22 ± 1.6 μM (48 h)/A549 (22.38 ± 2.9 /CDDP) | 11.02 ± 1.3 μM(48 h)/HepG2 (18.89 ± 2.1/CDDP) | 8.73 ± 1.0 μM(48 h)/HeLa (10.21 ± 1.9/CDDP) | Jana et al., | ||
| 5.2 ± 2.0 μM/T98G (69.6 ± 7.9 /CDDP) | 15.5 ± 2.3 μM/KB (72.6 ± 6.2 /CDDP) | 18.3 ± 3.0 μM/SNU80 (49.3 ± 5.4 /CDDP) | 36.2 ± 5.1 μM/ | Mishra et al., | |
| 4.5 ± 2.1 μM/T98G (69.6 ± 7.9 /CDDP) | 13.0 ± 1.2 μM/KB (72.6 ± 6.2 /CDDP) | 12.0 ± 2.8 μM/SNU80 (49.3 ± 5.4 /CDDP) | 35.0 ± 3.8 μM/ | Mishra et al., |
Cell types given in bold are normal non-cancerous cells.
Figure 3Effect of rhomboid 9 on tumor growth rate in MDA-MB-231 xenografts. (Left) Representative pictures of tumors, excised from control and mice treated with rhomboid 9. (Right) Localization of the near-infrared contrast agent IR-783 in the tumors of the control and treated mice. The signal was processed with Living Image software with one representative sample for each group presented above. Mice from the rhomboid 9-treated group show lower intensity of the signal originating from the tumor-accumulated contrast agent compared with the control group. Adapted with permission from Grishagin et al. (2014).
Figure 4Polymeric networks in P1 and P2 built by interconnecting metallacylces 8b. Adapted with permission from Zhang et al. (2016).
Figure 5Construction of porphyrin-containing metallacycle within the confined cavity of mesoporous carbon FDU-16. Adapted with permission from Chen et al. (2018); Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6Heterobimetallic cycles 12 – 14 with notable optical, electrochemical, and anticancer properties.
Figure 7Metallosupramolecular cages with general formula [Pd2L4](BF4)4 built from a series of tri- or bi-pyridyl ditopic ligands.
Cytotoxicity data of selected metallacages against a panel of human cancer cells (Figure 7).
| 41.4 ± 3.9μM (24 h)/A549 (9.4 ± 0.3/CDDP) | 56.7 ± 2.2 μM(24 h)/MDA-MB-231 (41.2 ± 3.9/CDDP) | 70.1 ± 13.8 μM 24 h)/DU145 | McNeill et al., | |
| 50 μM (24 h)/A549 (9.4 ± 0.3/CDDP) | 36.4 ± 1.9 μM(24 h)/MDA-MB-231 (41.2 ± 3.9/CDDP) | Preston et al., | ||
| 16.5 ± 4.3 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 16.7 ± 2.0 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | 8.2 ± 1.6 μM (72 h)/HepG2 (6.4 ± 1.5/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | |
| 47.3 ± 1.8 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 66.0 ± 10.8 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | ||
| 13.2 ± 2.4 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 11.6 ± 1.7 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | 10.7 ± 0.6 μM (72 h)/HepG2 (6.4 ± 1.5/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | |
| 32.0 ± 9.7 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 44.0 ± 6.2 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | 29.7 ± 2.6 μM (72 h)/HepG2 (6.4 ± 1.5/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | |
| 5.9 ± 1.4 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 8.0 ± 1.4 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | ||
| 1.1 ± 0.3 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 1.1 ± 0.6 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | ||
| 82.6 ± 15.1 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 94.4 ± 7.9 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | ||
| 1.4 ± 0.5 μM (72 h)/A549 (8.9 ± 4.2/CDDP) | 1.2 ± 0.7 μM(72 h)/SKOV-3 (15.4 ± 2.2/CDDP) | Schmidt et al., | ||
| 71.8 ± 9.1 μM (48 h)/A549 (16.8 ± 0.7/CDDP) | 44 ± 11 μM(48 h)/HepG2 (6.7 ± 0.9/CDDP) | Kaiser et al., | ||
| 6.9 ± 0.9 μM (24 h)/A549 (9.4 ± 0.3/CDDP) | 6.0 ± 0.6 μM(24 h)/MDA-MB-231 (41.2 ± 3.9/CDDP) | 3.4 ± 0.4 μM (24 h)/DU145 | McNeill et al., | |
| 5.1 μM/HBL100 (4.9/CDDP) | 6.7 μM/T47D(28.3/CDDP) | Hotze et al., | ||
| 0.16 μM/HBL100 (4.9 μM/CDDP) | 0.29 μM/T47D(28.3 μM/CDDP) | Hotze et al., | ||
| 22 μM/HBL100 (4.9 μM/CDDP) | 53 μM/T47D(28.3 μM/CDDP) | Pascu et al., |
Figure 8Dipodal ligands (L9 – L13) for building helical metallosupramolecules similarly to represented crystallographic views of selected examples (21 – 25). Views of the crystal structures are produced with Mercury3.8 software from the corresponding files: 21 – CCDC 762916; 22 – CCDC 603391; 23 – CCDC 603392; 24 – CCDC 636261; 25 – CCDC 1566897; all are freely available from www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
Figure 9Advanced metallo supramolecular systems constructed from platinum metallacages. (A) Pt(IV) adamantyl prodrug encapsulated in the rhombic Pt-cage 1 (adapted from Zheng et al., 2015; Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry); (B) hybrid metallosupramolecular-polymeric nanoparticles built from host-guest complex of fluorescein-conjugated Pt(IV) prodrug and Pt-cage 1 coated with anionic polymer shell (adapted from Yue et al., 2018; with permission from RSC); (C) theranostic supramolecular nanoparticles built from highly emissive metallacage, Pt-cage 2, and biotin-conjugated PEGylated surfactant (adapted from Yu et al., 2016).
Figure 10Metallosupramolecular capsules 26 and 27 and barrels 28 and 29 with characteristic hydrophobic cavities.