| Literature DB >> 30619772 |
Chen Wang1, Hongcui Diao1, Ping Ren2, Xufu Wang3, Yangang Wang1, Wenjuan Zhao1.
Abstract
Purpose: Radioiodine (131I) thyroid remnant ablation is an important treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and various factors affecting its efficacy have been reported but not well defined. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and the affecting factors of 131I ablation after total or near-total thyroidectomy in a relative large DTC cohort.Entities:
Keywords: affecting factors; differentiated thyroid carcinoma; iodine-131; remnant ablation; thyroglobulin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619772 PMCID: PMC6306449 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Comparison of the efficacy of the first 131I ablation between various affecting factors (n, %).
| Age (Year) | 0.363 | 0.547 | ||
| <45 | 134 | 86 (64.18) | ||
| ≥45 | 127 | 86 (67.72) | ||
| Gender | 2.625 | 0.105 | ||
| Male | 80 | 47 (58.75) | ||
| Female | 181 | 125 (69.06) | ||
| Operation method | 1.759 | 0.186 | ||
| Total thyroidectomy | 203 | 138 (67.98) | ||
| Near-total thyroidectomy | 58 | 34 (58.62) | ||
| Histological type | 0.003 | 0.953 | ||
| PTC | 235 | 155 (65.96) | ||
| FTC | 26 | 17 (65.38) | ||
| HT | 0.007 | 0.934 | ||
| Yes | 24 | 16 (66.67) | ||
| No | 237 | 156 (65.82) | ||
| Number of foci | 3.009 | 0.390 | ||
| 1 | 120 | 85 (70.83) | ||
| 2 | 91 | 55 (60.44) | ||
| 3 | 28 | 19 (67.86) | ||
| ≥4 | 22 | 13 (59.09) | ||
| Unilateral or bilateral foci | 2.314 | 0.128 | ||
| Unilateral | 166 | 115 (69.28) | ||
| Bilateral | 95 | 57 (60.00) | ||
| TSH (mIU/L) | 0.265 | 0.876 | ||
| 30–59 | 30 | 16 (53.33) | ||
| 60–89 | 51 | 26 (50.98) | ||
| ≥90 | 180 | 99 (55.00) | ||
| Time interval between surgery and first 131I ablation (Month) | 1.586 | 0.811 | ||
| ≤1 | 93 | 64 (68.82) | ||
| 1~2 | 112 | 74 (66.07) | ||
| 2~3 | 25 | 15 (60.00) | ||
| 3~6 | 18 | 12 (66.67) | ||
| >6 | 13 | 7 (53.85) | ||
| TNM stage | 0.155 | 0.693 | ||
| I-II | 151 | 101 (66.89) | ||
| III-IV | 110 | 71 (64.55) |
Postoperative pathological diagnosis; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma.
Comparison of tumor diameters between the first 131I ablation successful group and the unsuccessful group (cm).
| Successful group | 0.1 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 1.55 | 0.08 |
| Unsuccessful group | 0.3 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 1.95 | 0.12 |
| Total | 0.1 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 1.68 | 0.07 |
T = 2.941, p = 0.004. S. E, standard error.
Comparison of the efficacy of the first 131I ablation between groups with different clinical and laboratory parameters (n, %).
| Tumor diameter (cm) | 11.418 | 0.001 | ||
| ≤1.68 | 149 | 111 (74.50) | ||
| >1.68 | 112 | 61 (54.46) | ||
| sTg (ng/ml) | 72.795 | 0.000 | ||
| ≤5.45 | 131 | 119 (90.84) | ||
| >5.45 | 130 | 53 (40.77) | ||
| sTg/TSH (mg/IU) | 68.407 | 0.000 | ||
| ≤0.066 | 131 | 118 (90.08) | ||
| >0.066 | 130 | 54 (41.54) | ||
| DOSE of 131I (mCi) | 20.215 | 0.000 | ||
| 100 | 168 | 127 (75.60) | 7.165 | 0.007 |
| 120 | 34 | 18 (52.94) | 17.812 | 0.000b |
| 150–200 | 59 | 27 (45.76) | 0.445 | 0.505 |
| Risk stratification of recurrence | 8.721 | 0.013 | ||
| Low risk | 24 | 22 (91.67) | 6.127 | 0.013 |
| Intermediate risk | 113 | 75 (66.37) | 8.657 | 0.003 |
| High risk | 124 | 75 (60.48) | 0.882 | 0.348 |
| With or without metastasis | 24.661 | 0.000 | ||
| No metastasis | 40 | 37 (92.50) | 8.823 | 0.003 |
| No postoperative metastasis | 133 | 92 (69.17) | 19.090 | 0.000 |
| Postoperative lymph node metastasis | 38 | 18 (47.37) | 18.728 | 0.000 |
| Distant metastasis | 50 | 25 (50.00) | 6.124 | 0.013 |
| 5.793 | 0.016 | |||
| 0.060 | 0.807 |
1.68 cm is the mean of the tumor size;
5.45 ng/ml is the median of sTg; 0.066 mg/IU is the median of sTg/TSH ratio;
There was no metastasis before and after surgery;
Surgery had the lymph node metastasis cleaned and no lymph node and distant metastasis was found after surgery;
There were still lymph node metastasizes but no distant metastasis after surgery;
All of the patients had lymph node metastasis, among them 39 cases of lung metastasis, 6 cases of bone metastasis, 5 cases of both bone and lung metastasis.
100mCi group compared with 120mCi, 150~200mCi groups.
120mCi group compared with 150~200mCi group.
low risk group compared with intermediate and high risk groups, respectively.
intermediate risk group compared with high risk group.
no metastasis group compared with without postoperative metastasis, postoperative lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis groups, respectively.
without postoperative metastasis group compared with postoperative lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis groups.
postoperative lymph node metastasis group compared with distant metastasis group.
Multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent affecting factors of the efficacy of 131I ablation.
| Tumor diameter | −0.465 | 0.138 | 11.301 | 1 | 0.001 | 0.628 |
| sTg | −0.002 | 0.001 | 8.856 | 1 | 0.003 | 0.998 |
| Metastasis situation | 10.900 | 3 | 0.012 | |||
| No metastasis after operation | −1.000 | 0.851 | 1.383 | 1 | 0.240 | 0.368 |
| Lymph node metastasis after operation | −2.244 | 0.783 | 8.217 | 1 | 0.004 | 0.106 |
| Distant metastasis | −1.585 | 0.748 | 4.491 | 1 | 0.034 | 0.205 |
| Intermediate-to high-risk | −0.346 | 0.917 | 0.142 | 1 | 0.706 | 0.708 |
| Constant | 3.494 | 0.830 | 17.741 | 1 | 0.000 | 32.928 |
B, partial regression coefficient; S.E, standard error; Wals, Wald statistics; EXP (B), the OR value of the corresponding variable.
Figure 1The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for sTg, sTg/TSH ratio and tumor size before 131I ablation to predict unsuccessful ablation. ROC curve analysis was constructed to determine the best cut-off values of sTg, sTg/TSH ratio, and tumor diameter (as indicated) before 131I ablation for predicting the unsuccessful ablation and to assess the predict values of the affecting factors.
Comparison of clinical efficacy between different metastatic groups 6 months after the first 131I ablation (n, %).
| No metastasis | 40 | 34 (85.00) | 6 (15.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 6 (15.00) |
| No postoperative metastasis | 133 | 89 (66.92) | 33 (24.81) | 11 (8.27) | 0 (0.00) | 44 (33.08) |
| Postoperative lymph node metastasis | 38 | 10 (26.32) | 9 (23.68) | 5 (13.16) | 14 (36.84) | 28 (73.68) |
| Distant metastasis | 50 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 50 (100.00) | 50 (100.00) |
| Total | 261 | 133 (50.96) | 48 (18.39) | 16 (6.13) | 64 (24.52) | 128 (49.04) |
| X2 | ||||||
| X2 | ||||||
denotes IDR, BIR, SIR;
the comparison of clinical effect;
the comparison of ER rate.
and
indicate no metastasis group compared with no postoperative metastasis, postoperative lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis groups, respectively;
and
no postoperative metastasis group compared with postoperative lymph node metastasis group and distant metastasis group;
postoperative lymph node metastasis group compared with distant metastasis group.
There was no metastasis before and after surgery;
Surgery had the lymph node metastasis cleaned and no lymph node and distant metastasis was found after surgery;
There were still lymph node metastasizes but no distant metastasis after surgery;
All of the patients had lymph node metastasis, among them 39 cases of lung metastasis, 6 cases of bone metastasis, 5 cases of both bone and lung metastasis.