| Literature DB >> 30619705 |
Peter H Holz1,2, Linda F Lumsden3, Alistair R Legione2, Jasmin Hufschmid1.
Abstract
While bats are often viewed as carriers of infectious disease agents, little research has been conducted on the effects these pathogens may have on the bat populations themselves. The southern bent-winged bat (Miniopterus orianae bassanii) is a critically endangered subspecies endemic to south-eastern Australia. Population numbers of this bat have declined over the past 50 years, but the reasons for this are unclear. As part of a larger study to determine if disease could be a contributing factor to this decline, southern bent-winged bats from several locations in Victoria and South Australia were captured and examined for the presence of the blood parasite, Polychromophilus melanipherus, and haemoplasmas (Mycoplasma sp.). Results were compared with those obtained from populations of the more common, partially sympatric, eastern bent-winged bat (Miniopterus orianae oceanensis) from three different locations in Victoria. Both organisms were found in both subspecies (prevalence of P. melanipherus 60% by PCR for southern bent-winged bats compared with 46% for eastern bent-winged bats; prevalence of haemoplasmas 10% for southern bent-winged bats compared with 8% for eastern bent-winged bats), with no association between the probability of infection, body weight, abnormal blood parameters or any other indicators of ill health. However, Victorian southern bent-winged bats had heavier burdens of P. melanipherus than both the South Australian southern bent-winged bats and eastern bent-winged bats. Further investigations are required to determine if these differences are impacting population health.Entities:
Keywords: Haemoplasma; Miniopterus orianae bassanii; Miniopterus orianae oceanensis; Parasites; Polychromophilus melanipherus; bats
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619705 PMCID: PMC6287050 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.11.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Fig. 1Blood smear showing Polychomophilus melanipherus gametocytes within erythrocytes (Arrows). Diff Quik stain. x 400 magnification.
Prevalence of Polychromophilus melanipherus and haemoplasmas in southern and eastern bent-winged bats by blood smear and/or PCR. All bats are adults unless otherwise indicated. n = sample size. NT = not tested due to insufficient blood volume collected. Intensity of infection = mean number of organisms observed/bat following a 10 min scan of the slide under oil immersion.
| Location | Date | Haemoplasma | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence (%) | Intensity of infection (smear) | Prevalence (%) | |||
| Blood smear (n) | PCR (n) | PCR (n) | |||
| Allansford | Sep 2015 | 58 (19) | NT | 2.9 ± 4.6 | NT |
| Male | 75 (8) | NT | 1.7 ± 2.4 | NT | |
| Female | 45 (11) | NT | 3.7 ± 5.6 | NT | |
| Portland 1 | Sep 2016 | 54 (26) | 90 (10) | 4.2 ± 7.0 | 21 (14) |
| Male | 50 (10) | 100 (3) | 2.9 ± 4.1 | 50 (4) | |
| Female | 56 (16) | 86 (7) | 5.1 ± 8.4 | 10 (10) | |
| Portland 2 | Feb 2017 | 63 (16) | 100 (3) | 1.5 ± 1.6 | 33 (3) |
| Male | 83 (12) | 100 (3) | 2.0 ± 1.5 | 33 (3) | |
| Female | 0 (4) | NT | 0 | NT | |
| Naracoorte | Jan 2016 | 41 (59) | 88 (8) | 1.1 ± 2.1 | 17 (6) |
| Male | 36 (28) | 100 (4) | 1.0 ± 2.4 | 0 (3) | |
| Female | 45 (31) | 75 (4) | 1.2 ± 1.8 | 33 (3) | |
| Naracoorte | Sep 2016 | 28 (69) | 42 (36) | 0.8 ± 2.1 | 3 (35) |
| Male | 35 (34) | 54 (13) | 1.2 ± 2.6 | 0 (14) | |
| Female | 20 (35) | 30 (23) | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 5 (21) | |
| 41 (189) | 60 (57) | 1.6 ± 3.6 | 10 (58) | ||
| | 47 (92) | 74 (23) | 1.5 ± 2.6 | 7 (30) | |
| | 36 (97) | 47 (34) | 1.8 ± 4.3 | 14 (28) | |
| Christmas Hills | April 2015 | 20 (10) | NT | 0.6 ± 1.6 | NT |
| Male | 25 (4) | NT | 1.3 ± 2.5 | NT | |
| Female | 17 (6) | NT | 0.2 ± 0.4 | NT | |
| Christmas Hills | Sep 2015 | 35 (17) | 67 (6) | 1.2 ± 2.7 | 25 (4) |
| Male | 33 (12) | 100 (3) | 1.3 ± 3.1 | 50 (2) | |
| Female | 40 (5) | 33 (3) | 0.8 ± 1.1 | 0 (2) | |
| Eildon | Sep 2016 | 25 (36) | 57 (14) | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 8 (13) |
| Male | 18 (11) | 75 (4) | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 25 (4) | |
| Female | 28 (25) | 50 (10) | 0.6 ± 1.3 | 0 (9) | |
| Lakes Entrance | March 2017 | 23 (22)* | 13 (8)# | 0.5 ± 1.0 | 0 (8)# |
| Male | 0 (6) | 0 (1) | 0 | 0 (3) | |
| Female | 45 (16) | 14 (7) | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 0 (5) | |
| 26 (85) | 46 (28) | 0.6 ± 1.6 | 8 (25) | ||
| | 21 (33) | 75 (8) | 0.7 ± 2.1 | 22 (9) | |
| | 29 (52) | 35 (20) | 0.6 ± 1.2 | 0 (16) | |
* Six of these bats were juveniles. # Two of these bats were juveniles. All were negative.
Haematological parameters of southern and eastern bent-wing bats from southern Australia. n = sample size. NT = not tested due to insufficient blood volume collected. PE = polychromatophilic erythrocytes. No/OIF = mean number of PE observed/oil immersion field. PCV = packed cell volume. RCC = red cell count.
| Location | Date | PE | PCV | RCC x 1012/L (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allansford | Sep 2015 | 21.0 ± 14.6 (19) | NT | NT |
| Portland 1 | Sep 2016 | 13.4 ± 4.4 (26) | 50.8 ± 3.5 (14) | 12.9 ± 1.0 (14) |
| Portland 2 | Feb 2017 | 11.9 ± 3.2 (16) | 43.8 ± 2.5 (8) | 11.7 ± 1.5 (8) |
| Naracoorte | Jan 2016 | 11.0 ± 2.7 (59) | NT | NT |
| Naracoorte | Sep 2016 | 13.2 ± 4.4 (69) | 50.8 ± 6.0 (57) | 12.9 ± 1.6 (57) |
| 13.2 ± 6.4 (189) | 50.2 ± 5.9 (79) | 12.8 ± 1.5 (79) | ||
| Christmas Hills | April 2015 | 9.6 ± 2.7 (10) | NT | NT |
| Christmas Hills | Sep 2015 | 7.8 ± 3.5 (17) | 50.8 ± 6.6 (4) | NT |
| Eildon | Sep 2016 | 11.2 ± 6.0 (36) | 55.4 ± 5.4 (11) | 13.8 ± 1.8 (11) |
| Lakes Entrance | March 2017 | 11.5 ± 3.6 (22) | NT | NT |
| 10.4 ± 4.8 (85) | 53.8 ± 6.1 (15) | |||
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree demonstrating the relationship between the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene of seven Polychromophilus melanipherus isolates detected using PCR in Victorian southern bent-winged bats (D23, D26, D33 and D39), South Australian southern bent-winged bats (N42) and eastern bent-winged bats (E4 and E19) and a selection of other haematozoa. The tree was generated using MrBayes v3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001) with four heated chains, a chain length of 1,000,000, sampling every 1000 iterations, and a burn in of 10%. The model used was the general time reversible model (Tavare, 1986) with gamma-distributed rate variation across sites. Numbers represent branch support values as posterior probability. GenBank accession numbers are located to the right of each organism.
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree demonstrating the relationship between the 16S rRNA gene of a haemoplasma isolate detected using PCR in a Victorian southern bent-winged bat (D19) and a selection of other haemoplasmas. The tree was generated using MrBayes v3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001) with four heated chains, a chain length of 1,000,000, sampling every 1000 iterations, and a burn in of 10%. The model used was the Hasegawa Kishino Yano model (Hasegawa et al., 1985) with gamma-distributed rate variation across sites. Numbers represent branch support values as posterior probability. GenBank accession numbers are located to the right of each organism.