| Literature DB >> 30619362 |
Caroline Pfeifer1, Andrew J Highton1, Sven Peine2, Jürgen Sauter3, Alexander H Schmidt3,4, Madeleine J Bunders1,5, Marcus Altfeld1,6, Christian Körner1.
Abstract
NK cells expressing self-inhibitory receptors display increased functionality compared to NK cells lacking those receptors. The acquisition of functional competence in these particular NK-cell subsets is termed education. Little is known about the underlying mechanisms that lead to the functional differences between educated and uneducated NK cells. An increasing number of studies suggest that cellular metabolism is a determinant of immune cell functions. Thus, alterations in cellular metabolic pathways may play a role in the process of NK-cell education. Here, we compared the glycolytic profile of educated and uneducated primary human NK cells. KIR-educated NK cells showed significantly increased expression levels of the glucose transporter Glut1 in comparison to NKG2A-educated or uneducated NK cells with and without exposure to target cells. Subsequently, the metabolic profile of NK-cell subsets was determined using a Seahorse XF Analyzer. Educated NK cells displayed significantly higher rates of cellular glycolysis than uneducated NK cells even in a resting state. Our results indicate that educated and uneducated NK cells reside in different metabolic states prior to activation. These differences in the ability to utilize glucose may represent an underlying mechanism for the superior functionality of educated NK cells expressing self-inhibitory receptors.Entities:
Keywords: Glut1; HLA class I; NK-cell education; cytotoxicity; glycolysis; killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR); metabolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619362 PMCID: PMC6305746 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Experimental setup for the assessment of NK-cell function and glycolytic profile. Upper panel: Peripheral blood was processed through density gradient centrifugation to isolate peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Subsequently, NK cells were enriched via immunomagnetic negative selection. Lower panel: NK cells were analyzed via flow cytometry for expression of the inhibitory receptors KIR2DL1, KIR2DL2/L3, KIR3DL1, and NKG2A to identify NK cells positive for self-inhibitory receptors (educated). NK-cell function was determined by the expression of CD107a after co-culture with the MHC class I devoid target cell lines K-562 and 721.221. Simultaneously, expression of the glucose transporter Glut1 was examined to assess the glycolytic profile. In addition, glucose uptake assays were performed and the effect of the metabolic inhibitor 2-DG on NK-cell degranulation was investigated. Based on the expression of self-inhibitory receptors educated and uneducated NK cells were sorted the same day and rested overnight. The following day, a Glycolysis Stress Test was performed to calculate the rates for glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, and glycolytic reserve.
Figure 2Education of primary NK cells. Flow cytometric assessment of NK-cell function after exposure to various target cells. Enriched primary NK cells from healthy donors (n = 45) were cultured either in the absence (gray) or presence of 721.221 cells (cyan) or K-562 cells (purple). (A) Proportion of CD107a+ bulk NK cells. Statistical analysis: Friedman test, Dunn's multiple comparisons test. Black bars represent the median. (B) Upper panel: Representative histogram of CD107a expression of educated and uneducated NK cells after stimulation with target cells. Numbers indicate the percentage of CD107a+ cells after exposure to target cells. Lower panel: Comparison of CD107a expression frequency between educated and uneducated NK cells. Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test with subsequent Bonferroni correction. Black bars represent the median.
Figure 3KIR-educated NK cells express higher levels of Glut1. (A–C) Flow cytometric assessment of the glucose transporter Glut1 expression on NK cells with and without exposure to various target cells. Enriched primary NK cells from healthy donors (n = 29) were cultured for 4 h either in absence (gray) or presence of 721.221 cells (cyan) or K-562 cells (purple). (A) Left panel: Representative histogram of Glut1 expression of bulk NK cells. Right panel: Relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) of Glut1 on bulk NK cells. Statistical analysis: Friedman test, Dunn's multiple comparisons test. Black bars represent the median. (B) Comparison of Glut1 expression (RFI) between CD107a+ and CD107a− NK cells in presence of 721.221 cells (cyan) or K-562 cells (purple). Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test with subsequent Bonferroni correction. Black bars represent the median. (C) Comparison of Glut1 expression (RFI) between educated and uneducated NK cells (left panel) and between KIR- and NKG2A-educated NK cells (right panel). Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test with subsequent Bonferroni correction. Black bars represent the median. Dashed lines indicate the median of 2-NBDG fluorescence (RFI) of uneducated NK cells. (D) Flow cytometric assessment of glucose uptake by enriched primary NK cells using 2-NBDG (n = 6). Comparison of Glucose uptake between educated and uneducated NK cells (left panel) and between KIR- and NKG2A-educated NK cells (right panel). Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. Black bars represent the median. Dashed lines indicate the median of 2-NBDG fluorescence (RFI) of uneducated NK cells. (E) Impact of metabolic inhibitors on NK cell degranulation. Enriched primary NK cells from healthy donors (n = 6) were pretreated with either 2-DG (2DG), glucose-free media (GfM), both or left in complete medium before cultured for 4 h either in absence or presence of K-562 cells. Scatter plots shows the relative change of CD107a+ cells in the treated samples compared to the medium control. Plots compare educated with uneducated NK cells (left panel) and KIR-educated with NKG2A-educated NK cells (right panel). Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test with subsequent Bonferroni correction. Boxes and whiskers indicate the median, 25/75% percentile and the minimum/maximum. Dashed line indicates 100%.
Figure 4Educated and uneducated NK cells display different glycolytic profiles. The glycolytic profile of FACS-sorted educated and uneducated NK cells was determined in a Glycolysis Stress Test using the Seahorse XF extracellular flux analyzer (n = 18). (A) Representative ECAR (left panel) and OCR data right panel of educated and uneducated NK cells measured in a Glycolysis Stress Test from a single donor. (B) Comparison of glycolysis (left panel), glycolytic capacity (middle panel) and glycolytic reserve (right panel) between educated and uneducated NK cells calculated from ECAR data (n = 18). Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test with subsequent Bonferroni correction. Black bars represent the median. (C) Comparison of the basal respiration between educated and uneducated NK cells derived from OCR data (n = 18). Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Black bars represent the median.