| Literature DB >> 30619213 |
Peng Si1, Wei Shao1,2, Huili Yu1, Xiaojing Yang1, Dengtao Gao1, Xiansheng Qiao1, Zhiqiang Wang1, Guoliang Wu2,3.
Abstract
The rhizosphere microenvironment is the site of nutrient circulation and microbial community formation, and thus is an ongoing topic of research. Although research on this topic is extensive, studies into the rhizosphere microenvironment of fruit trees remain rare. To elucidate the mechanisms driving the fruit tree rhizosphere microenvironment, we assessed soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, the community-level physiological profile (CLPP) and microbial diversity in rhizospheric soils of eight common deciduous fruit trees in northern China. We found that the available minerals, pH, enzyme activities, microbial utilization of six types of carbon (C) substrates, and microbial diversity in the rhizosphere varied among tree species. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that rhizosphere microenvironmental parameters (ammonia nitrogen content, soil pH and invertase activity) were closely related to the soil microbial community. Further analysis revealed that the soil microbial utilization of six C sources, nitrate nitrogen content, and invertase activity were negatively correlated with Ambiguous species and Alternaria; however, these groups were positively correlated with pH. The ammonia nitrogen content was positively correlated with C source utilization and negatively correlated with Ambiguous, Lysobacter, Nitrospira, Alternaria, Fusarium, and Colletotrichum. Interestingly, invertase was closely linked to the microbial community, especially fungal diversity, and was positively correlated with plant-beneficial microbes such as Mortierella, Geomyces, Lysobacter, and Chaetomium, but negatively correlated with pathogenic microbes such as Alternaria, Fusarium, and Colletotrichum. Hence, rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activities and microbial community were significantly affected by tree species. Additionally, a variety of environmental factors were closely related to the microbial community in the rhizospheric soils of eight species of deciduous fruit trees.Entities:
Keywords: Pearson correlation; deciduous fruit trees; redundancy analysis; rhizosphere microenvironment; soil enzyme activity; soil microbial community; soil physicochemical properties
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619213 PMCID: PMC6305578 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Rhizosphere soil physicochemical properties of different deciduous fruit trees in northern China.
| CK | 8.05 ± 0.03 | 1.39 ± 0.42 | 5.62 ± 0.2 | 202.6 ± 1.16 | 125.89 ± 0.85 | 16.31 ± 0.36 |
| Grape | 7.25 ± 0.03 | 2.23 ± 0.13 | 6.63 ± 0.67 | 231.2 ± 5.65 | 21.33 ± 0.65 | 19.55 ± 0.07 |
| Walnut | 6.95 ± 0.03 | 5.71 ± 0.26 | 6.73 ± 0.62 | 356.67 ± 3.39 | 296.1 ± 10.11 | 32.91 ± 0.38 |
| Pomegranate | 7 ± 0.06 | 4.9 ± 0.56 | 10.37 ± 0.14 | 454.37 ± 8.04 | 34.85 ± 1.15 | 22.78 ± 0.25 |
| Apricot | 7.8 ± 0 | 3.23 ± 0.12 | 7.83 ± 0.04 | 282.93 ± 2.36 | 29.12 ± 1.52 | 23.13 ± 0.12 |
| Cherry | 7.3 ± 0 | 3.73 ± 0.21 | 6.33 ± 0.04 | 240.4 ± 0.86 | 35.62 ± 1.88 | 24.61 ± 0.03 |
| Peach | 7.35 ± 0.03 | 4.27 ± 0.59 | 10.09 ± 0.6 | 555.62 ± 31.23 | 40.58 ± 1.48 | 19.9 ± 0.18 |
| Apple | 7.15 ± 0.03 | 6.16 ± 0.4 | 6.01 ± 1.02 | 483.83 ± 4.97 | 119.61 ± 8.45 | 16.73 ± 0.12 |
| Pear | 7.7 ± 0 | 1.91 ± 0.27 | 12.68 ± 0.26 | 323.53 ± 2.11 | 214.45 ± 1.17 | 23.06 ± 0.3 |
Values are means ± SE. Suffixes in the same row indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 using one-way analysis of variance with tree species as the factor.
Soil enzyme activities of different deciduous fruit trees in northern China.
| CK | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 3.59 ± 0.2 | 2.08 ± 0.02 | 33.65 ± 2.54 |
| Grape | 0.53 ± 0.04 | 0.78 ± 0.03 | 1.76 ± 0.01 | 7.05 ± 0.14 | 2.54 ± 0.08 | 32.91 ± 1.3 |
| Walnut | 0.61 ± 0.03 | 1.53 ± 0.04 | 1.78 ± 0 | 8.84 ± 0.17 | 2.36 ± 0.07 | 133.68 ± 10.45 |
| Pomegranate | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 1.43 ± 0.05 | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 13.62 ± 0.28 | 2.24 ± 0.02 | 123.07 ± 12.34 |
| Apricot | 0.54 ± 0 | 1.6 ± 0.09 | 1.77 ± 0.01 | 10.46 ± 0.15 | 1.51 ± 0.03 | 286.96 ± 23.96 |
| Cherry | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 1.21 ± 0.06 | 1.77 ± 0.01 | 8.94 ± 0.24 | 1.4 ± 0.03 | 127.63 ± 7.23 |
| Peach | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0 | 1.69 ± 0.01 | 7.05 ± 0.06 | 1.68 ± 0.02 | 181.19 ± 11.48 |
| Apple | 0.46 ± 0.04 | 1.05 ± 0.03 | 1.58 ± 0 | 6.7 ± 0.2 | 1.31 ± 0.02 | 41.78 ± 2.63 |
| Pear | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 1.53 ± 0.05 | 1.62 ± 0.01 | 6.21 ± 0.06 | 1.62 ± 0.03 | 42.78 ± 2.13 |
Values are means ± SE. Suffixes in the same row indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 using one-way analysis of variance with tree species as the factor.
Figure 1Effect of different deciduous fruit trees on the root-associated microbial community carbon source utilization in northern China. Principal component analysis (PCA) of carbon substrate utilization patterns obtained with Biolog Eco-plates, showing different deciduous fruit trees.
Figure 2Effect of different deciduous fruit trees on the rhizosphere microbial community utilization of six types of carbon substrates at 96 h. Values are means ± SE, and letters denote significant differences among trees using one-way analysis of variance with tree species as the factor.
Bacterial and fungal a-diversity indexes of different deciduous fruit trees.
| Bacterial | CK | 0.997 ± 0 | 1366.865 ± 8.541 | 8.975 ± 0.023 | 1342.603 ± 5.988 |
| Grape | 0.997 ± 0 | 1397.477 ± 6.71 | 8.95 ± 0.003 | 1374.639 ± 8.014 | |
| Walnut | 0.996 ± 0 | 1338.359 ± 5.659 | 8.792 ± 0.007 | 1319.24 ± 8.625 | |
| Pomegranate | 0.997 ± 0 | 1357.428 ± 6.295 | 8.885 ± 0.023 | 1347.826 ± 2.315 | |
| Apricot | 0.997 ± 0 | 1328.005 ± 3.171 | 8.797 ± 0.025 | 1308.915 ± 2.401 | |
| Cherry | 0.997 ± 0 | 1368.154 ± 9.869 | 8.891 ± 0.021 | 1347.091 ± 10.192 | |
| Peach | 0.997 ± 0 | 1340.351 ± 8.061 | 8.647 ± 0.055 | 1311.949 ± 2.072 | |
| Apple | 0.997 ± 0 | 1423.78 ± 12.723 | 9.009 ± 0.013 | 1408.762 ± 7.574 | |
| Pear | 0.996 ± 0 | 1365.724 ± 4.927 | 8.75 ± 0.04 | 1346.985 ± 7.275 | |
| Fungal | CK | 0.999 ± 0 | 466.977 ± 11.061 | 5.51 ± 0.482 | 461.813 ± 10.701 |
| Grape | 0.998 ± 0 | 432.969 ± 6.426 | 4.294 ± 0.235 | 425.554 ± 10.345 | |
| Walnut | 0.999 ± 0 | 561.148 ± 13.228 | 6.082 ± 0.041 | 556.862 ± 12.517 | |
| Pomegranate | 1 ± 0 | 475.054 ± 26.096 | 6.311 ± 0.088 | 467.928 ± 21.481 | |
| Apricot | 0.999 ± 0 | 332.629 ± 33.117 | 2.095 ± 0.747 | 334.31 ± 33.561 | |
| Cherry | 0.999 ± 0 | 416.18 ± 13.587 | 5.473 ± 0.158 | 409.491 ± 10.173 | |
| Peach | 0.999 ± 0 | 529.852 ± 34.813 | 6.533 ± 0.047 | 519.31 ± 25.267 | |
| Apple | 0.998 ± 0 | 399.241 ± 36.439 | 1.864 ± 0.644 | 398.894 ± 28.223 | |
| Pear | 0.999 ± 0 | 447.645 ± 11.559 | 6.05 ± 0.568 | 442.215 ± 12.556 |
Values are means ± SE. Suffixes in the same row indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 using one-way analysis of variance with tree species as the factor.
Figure 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of bacterial (A) and fungal communities (B).
Figure 4Comparison of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the rhizosphere bacterial (A,B) and fungal (C,D) communities of different deciduous fruit trees. The Venn diagram depicts OTUs (97% sequence identity) that are shared or unique for different soil samples (A,C). The heatmap illustrates the relative abundance of the top 30 bacterial and fungal genera (B,D), and the scale bar shows the variation range of the normalized abundance of the bacterial community, indicating the differences in data among these trees. The left names are genera, and the color value of each square for each row indicates the relative abundance of genera.
Figure 5Relative abundances (%) of bacterial phyla (A–G; >1.0% of total composition in all samples) and fungal phyla (H–K; >0.01% of total composition in all sample). Values are means ± SE. Suffixes in the same row indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 using one-way analysis of variance with tree species as the factor.
Figure 6Redundancy analysis (RDA) of microbial communities using bacterial and fungal genus relative abundances. Community-level physiological profile (URE, urease; CAE, catalase; GLU, β-glucosidase; CE, cellulase; INE, invertase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase) of six types of substrates (PM, polymers; CH, carbohydrate; PC, phenolic compounds; CA, carboxylic acids; AA, amino acids; AN, amines) and mineral element content (OM, organic matter; K, available potassium; P, available phosphorus).
Pearson correlation coefficients between microbial genus relative abundances and environmental factors.
| −0.510 | −0.747 | −0.549 | −0.819 | −0.718 | −0.586 | −0.138 | 0.691 | −0.14 | 0.193 | −0.052 | −0.628 | −0.1 | −0.261 | −0.212 | 0.007 | −0.713 | −0.405 | |
| 0.577 | 0.391 | 0.352 | 0.372 | 0.666 | 0.367 | −0.208 | −0.372 | −0.182 | 0.193 | −0.131 | 0.197 | 0.158 | −0.044 | −0.361 | 0.338 | 0.162 | 0.01 | |
| 0.472 | 0.251 | 0.571 | 0.612 | 0.557 | 0.414 | −0.147 | −0.369 | −0.005 | −0.426 | −0.134 | 0.602 | 0.022 | −0.295 | −0.209 | −0.18 | 0.274 | 0.234 | |
| −0.493 | −0.069 | −0.494 | −0.487 | −0.526 | −0.216 | 0.187 | 0.239 | 0.281 | −0.175 | 0.204 | −0.176 | 0.015 | 0.1 | 0.457 | 0.148 | −0.171 | −0.034 | |
| 0.097 | 0.238 | 0.291 | 0.336 | 0.188 | 0.171 | 0.237 | −0.438 | 0.302 | −0.411 | 0.113 | 0.574 | 0.084 | −0.207 | −0.075 | −0.012 | 0.044 | 0.256 | |
| −0.099 | −0.262 | −0.298 | −0.560 | −0.355 | −0.185 | −0.057 | 0.458 | .390 | 0.169 | 0.632 | −0.496 | −0.102 | −0.373 | −0.094 | −0.273 | −0.388 | 0.099 | |
| −0.058 | 0.098 | 0.243 | 0.185 | 0.009 | 0.032 | 0.859 | −0.381 | −0.043 | −0.272 | −0.207 | 0.386 | 0.449 | 0.337 | 0.211 | 0.305 | 0.159 | 0.427 | |
| −0.063 | −0.044 | −0.224 | −0.135 | −0.164 | 0.072 | −0.016 | 0.312 | 0.283 | −0.276 | 0.484 | −0.246 | 0.213 | 0.234 | 0.506 | −0.068 | 0.446 | 0.432 | |
| 0.04 | 0.029 | 0.041 | 0.235 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.271 | −0.132 | 0.302 | −0.384 | 0.465 | 0.092 | 0.590 | 0.476 | 0.302 | 0.251 | 0.753 | 0.589 | |
| −0.265 | 0.163 | −0.242 | 0.012 | −0.187 | 0.086 | −0.007 | 0.179 | 0.184 | −0.353 | 0.186 | 0.004 | −0.047 | 0.313 | 0.825 | −0.155 | 0.452 | 0.238 | |
| 0.013 | 0.08 | 0.017 | 0.321 | 0.101 | 0.154 | 0.084 | −0.175 | 0.184 | −0.397 | 0.269 | 0.17 | 0.430 | 0.524 | 0.313 | 0.235 | 0.786 | 0.36 | |
| −0.302 | −0.634 | −0.493 | −0.647 | −0.368 | −0.438 | −0.428 | 0.564 | −0.299 | 0.34 | −0.035 | −0.618 | 0.137 | −0.211 | −0.492 | 0.389 | −0.475 | −0.487 | |
| −0.099 | −0.466 | −0.327 | −0.509 | −0.164 | −0.38 | −0.422 | 0.405 | −0.305 | 0.475 | −0.015 | −0.632 | 0.222 | −0.107 | −0.569 | .515 | −0.392 | −0.433 | |
| −0.108 | −0.255 | −0.403 | −0.3 | −0.081 | −0.202 | −0.368 | 0.197 | −0.35 | 0.448 | −0.289 | −0.385 | 0.009 | −0.04 | −0.356 | 0.341 | −0.383 | −0.537 |
Enzyme activities (URE, Urease; CAE, Catalase; GLU, β-glucosidase; CE, Cellulase; INE, Invertase; ALP, Alkaline phosphatase), six types of substrates (PM, polymers; CH, carbohydrate; PC, phenolic compounds; CA, carboxylic acids; AA, amino acids; AN, amines), mineral element content (OM, organic matter; K, available K; P, available P; NN, NO3-N; ANN, NH4-N).
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.