| Literature DB >> 30619067 |
Zhike Zhou1, Yifan Liang2, Xiaoqian Zhang2, Junjie Xu3, Kexin Kang1, Huiling Qu4, Chuansheng Zhao2, Mei Zhao5.
Abstract
Background: The aim of our meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between plasma d-dimer and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).Entities:
Keywords: arteriovenous malformation; intracerebral hemorrhage; meta-analysis; plasma d-dimer; risk factor
Year: 2018 PMID: 30619067 PMCID: PMC6306414 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Flow chart of study selection in the meta-analysis.
General characteristics of the included studies.
| Kavalci | 2011 | Turky | ELFA | 14/29 | 1.78 ± 1.78 | 67.86 ± 12.6 | 8/20 | 0.15 ± 0.071 | 66.10 ± 8.6 | 8 |
| Fujii | 2001 | Japan | ELISA | 212/358 | 1.3 ± 2.2 | < 65 | NR/106 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | Age-matched | 8 |
| Pera | 2012 | Poland | ITA | 27/49 | 4.21 ± 0.6 | 69.6 ± 11.4 | 30/50 | 3.81 ± 0.44 | 65.9 ± 6.2 | 7 |
| Lip | 2001 | England | ELISA | 8/15 | 0.615 ± 0.677 | 64.2 ± 9.2 | 14/24 | 0.2 ± 0.12 | 65 ± 14 | 7 |
| Wersch | 1993 | Netherlands | ELISA | 20/34 | 1.137 ± 1.1 | 71.0 ± 11.6 | NR/135 | 0.199 ± 0.035 | 55.3 (24–90) | 7 |
| Antovic | 2002 | Sweden | GICT | 14/30 | 1 ± 1 | 63(33–74) | NR/10 | 0.5 ± 0.467 | NR | 6 |
| Zakai | 2017 | America | ITA | 41/66 | 0.51 ± 0.51 | 67 ± 9 | 481/986 | 0.43 ± 0.38 | 65 ± 3 | 6 |
| Gao | 2016 | China | ELISA | 31/53 | 1.17 ± 0.879 | 57.8 ± 16.2 | 27/50 | 0.131 ± 0.1 | 56.3 ± 15.5 | 8 |
| Ding | 2009 | China | ITA | 18/30 | 0.81 ± 0.14 | 58.12 ± 13.2 | 16/30 | 0.32 ± 0.12 | 56.15 ± 15.4 | 7 |
| Huang | 2009 | China | ELISA | 54/83 | 1.88 ± 0.92 | 60.9 ± 9.7 | 17/30 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 62.9 ± 8.4 | 7 |
| Zhu | 2008 | China | ELISA | 30/53 | 0.72 ± 0.33 | 56.8 ± 15.2 | 20/40 | 0.28 ± 0.12 | 50.2 ± 12.8 | 6 |
| Li | 2007 | China | ELISA | 49/80 | 0.89 ± 0.23 | 61.7 ± 9.2 | 19/35 | 0.53 ± 0.14 | 62.3 ± 7.6 | 8 |
| Kim | 2010 | Korea | ELFA | 5/11 | 3.31 ± 2.10 | 56.4 ± 14.5 | 25/57 | 0.19 ± 0.11 | 43.8 ± 12.0 | 6 |
M, male; NO, number; NR, not reported; ELFA, enzyme-linked fluorescence immunoassays; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ITA, immunoturbidimetric assay; GICT, Immune colloidal gold technique; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 2Forest plots for the comparisons of d-dimer levels between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients and healthy controls. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Forest plots of the subgroup analyses on continent in relation to d-dimer levels between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients and healthy controls. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4Forest plots of the subgroup analyses on sample size in relation to d-dimer levels between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients and healthy controls. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5Forest plots of the subgroup analyses on age in relation to d-dimer levels between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients and healthy controls. CI, confidence interval.
Figure 6The plot in the sensitivity analysis of present meta-analysis (given named study was omitted).
Figure 7Egger's funnel plot to detect risk of publication bias in the meta-analysis. SMD: standard mean difference.