Literature DB >> 30618485

Algorithms for Fitting the Constrained Lasso.

Brian R Gaines1, Juhyun Kim2, Hua Zhou2.   

Abstract

We compare alternative computing strategies for solving the constrained lasso problem. As its name suggests, the constrained lasso extends the widely-used lasso to handle linear constraints, which allow the user to incorporate prior information into the model. In addition to quadratic programming, we employ the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) and also derive an efficient solution path algorithm. Through both simulations and benchmark data examples, we compare the different algorithms and provide practical recommendations in terms of efficiency and accuracy for various sizes of data. We also show that, for an arbitrary penalty matrix, the generalized lasso can be transformed to a constrained lasso, while the converse is not true. Thus, our methods can also be used for estimating a generalized lasso, which has wide-ranging applications. Code for implementing the algorithms is freely available in both the Matlab toolbox SparseReg and the Julia package ConstrainedLasso. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternating direction method of multipliers; Convex optimization; Generalized lasso; Linear constraints; Penalized regression; Regularization path

Year:  2018        PMID: 30618485      PMCID: PMC6320228          DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2018.1473777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat        ISSN: 1061-8600            Impact factor:   2.302


  6 in total

1.  Sign-based Shrinkage Based on an Asymmetric LASSO Penalty.

Authors:  Eric S Kawaguchi; Burcu F Darst; Kan Wang; David V Conti
Journal:  J Data Sci       Date:  2021-06-02

2.  Application of a neural interface for restoration of leg movements: Intra-spinal stimulation using the brain electrical activity in spinally injured rabbits.

Authors:  Mohamad Amin Younessi Heravi; Keivan Maghooli; Fereidoun Nowshiravan Rahatabad; Ramin Rezaee
Journal:  J Appl Biomed       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.797

3.  A utility approach to individualized optimal dose selection using biomarkers.

Authors:  Pin Li; Jeremy M G Taylor; Spring Kong; Shruti Jolly; Matthew J Schipper
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.715

4.  Interactions Between Donor Age and 12-Month Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate on Allograft and Patient Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Wai H Lim; Esther Ooi; Helen L Pilmore; David W Johnson; Stephen P McDonald; Philip Clayton; Carmel Hawley; William R Mulley; Ross Francis; Michael G Collins; Bryon Jaques; Nicholas G Larkins; Christopher E Davies; Kate Wyburn; Steve J Chadban; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Tree-aggregated predictive modeling of microbiome data.

Authors:  Jacob Bien; Xiaohan Yan; Léo Simpson; Christian L Müller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Whole-brain tissue mapping toolkit using large-scale highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging and deep neural networks.

Authors:  Dragan Maric; Jahandar Jahanipour; Xiaoyang Rebecca Li; Aditi Singh; Aryan Mobiny; Hien Van Nguyen; Andrea Sedlock; Kedar Grama; Badrinath Roysam
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.