Literature DB >> 30617492

Multidetector CT findings differ between surgical grades of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Hyo-Jae Lee1, Jin Woong Kim2, Young Hoe Hur3, Byung Kook Lee4, Sung Bum Cho5, Eu Chang Hwang6, Seung Jin Lee1, Eun Ju Yoon7, Hyun Ju Seon7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define and correlate multidetector CT (MDCT) findings of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with surgical grading based on the 2016 Revised International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification.
METHODS: Between May 2011 and December 2016, 235 patients with periampullary tumor underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and postoperative MDCT. Patients were classified into three groups (clinically no pancreatic fistula (cNo-PF), grade B, and grade C) according to the ISGPF classification. MDCT images were retrospectively evaluated by two radiologists in consensus for the presence of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) dehiscence, PJ dehiscence diameter, PJ defect, acute necrotic collection (ANC), peripancreatic fluid collection, and imaging findings of complications. Categorical MDCT findings were compared among the three groups using Pearson's chi-square test, and PJ dehiscence diameter was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in patient demographics among the groups (cNo-PF = 133, grade B = 68, and grade C = 34), but the MDCT findings were significantly different regarding the presence of PJ dehiscence (p < 0.001), PJ defect (p < 0.001), ANC (p = 0.002), and imaging findings of total complications (p < 0.001). The diameters of PJ dehiscence were significantly different among the groups (cNo-PF [0.42 ± 1.54 mm], grade B [1.47 ± 2.33 mm], and grade C [5.38 ± 6.45 mm]) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: With respect to the presence of PF, postoperative MDCT findings may differ between surgical grading based on the ISGPF classification. KEY POINTS: • Regarding the presence of pancreatic fistula, the postoperative multidetector CT findings correlate well with surgical grading based on the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification. • Multidetector CT may provide reliable information to suggest pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Postoperative complications

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30617492     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5916-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

Review 1.  Complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: imaging and imaging-guided interventional procedures.

Authors:  D A Gervais; C Fernandez-del Castillo; M J O'Neill; P F Hahn; P R Mueller
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Duct-to-Mucosa vs Invagination for Pancreaticojejunostomy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial from a Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Xueli Bai; Qi Zhang; Shunliang Gao; Jianying Lou; Guogang Li; Yun Zhang; Tao Ma; Yibo Zhang; Yuanliang Xu; Tingbo Liang
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Analysis of clinical trials evaluating complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a new era of pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Postoperative findings following the Whipple procedure: determination of prevalence and morphologic abdominal CT features.

Authors:  K J Mortelé; M Lemmerling; B de Hemptinne; M De Vos; G De Bock; M Kunnen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Clinical and economic validation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) classification scheme.

Authors:  Wande B Pratt; Shishir K Maithel; Tsafrir Vanounou; Zhen S Huang; Mark P Callery; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: validation of International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery classification and analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Giuseppe Malleo; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Partelli; Roberto Rossini; Matilde Bacchion; Paolo Pederzoli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus standard Whipple procedure: a prospective, randomized, multicenter analysis of 170 patients with pancreatic and periampullary tumors.

Authors:  Khe T C Tran; Hans G Smeenk; Casper H J van Eijck; Geert Kazemier; Wim C Hop; Jan Willem G Greve; Onno T Terpstra; Jan A Zijlstra; Piet Klinkert; Hans Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment.

Authors:  Ruedi F Thoeni
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: definitions, risk factors, preventive measures, and management-review.

Authors:  Norman Oneil Machado
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-04-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  C-reactive protein identifies patients at risk of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage.

Authors:  C Vilhav; J B Fagman; E Holmberg; P Naredi; C Engström
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.