Literature DB >> 30617422

White paper: technology for surgical telementoring-SAGES Project 6 Technology Working Group.

Etai M Bogen1, Christopher M Schlachta2, Todd Ponsky3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in telecommunication technology and video conferencing systems have opened a new avenue for surgical instruction called "surgical telementoring." This report from the Technology Working Group of the SAGES Project 6 Summit reviews the telementoring technology that currently exists and proposes recommendations for minimum technology requirements and future technology development. While also providing insight in regulatory considerations, this review offers what prospective surgical telementoring participants need to know about the underlying technology with a specific focus on safety, reliability, transmission quality, ease of use, and cost.
METHODS: Content experts from around the world, in minimally invasive surgery, surgical mentoring and telementoring, surgical education, business development, healthcare innovation, and regulation were invited to attend a 2-day summit in Los Angeles, USA to outline the current state of surgical telementoring and chart the challenges and opportunities going forward. This article summarizes the discussion, conclusions, and recommendation of the technology group with regard to telementoring technology.
RESULTS: This article reviews the technical requirements which can be divided into the following categories: (1) safety, (2) reliability, (3) transmission quality, (4) ease of use, and (5) cost.
CONCLUSION: Telementoring applications are technology driven. Given the pace of change of technology, guiding principles in technology design and selection are warranted (Table 4). Telementoring technologies require two basic components, video capturing and display devices at the transmitting and receiving end, and a telecommunication link between them. Many additional features can be added to this basic setup including multiple cameras or video sources, remote camera zoom and pan, recording and storage of videos and images, and telestration capabilities to mention just a few. In general, the cost of these technologies is feature driven. The education framework for each specific application should determine the need for these features (Schlachta in Surg Endosc https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4988-5 ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Mentoring; Minimally invasive surgery; Technology; Telementoring

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30617422     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06631-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Internet-based videoconferencing coder/decoders and tools for telemedicine.

Authors:  Wei-Li Liu; Kai Zhang; Craig Locatis; Michael Ackerman
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 2.  Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: An emerging technology.

Authors:  Etai M Bogen; Knut M Augestad; Hiten Rh Patel; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

3.  Project 6 Summit: SAGES telementoring initiative.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Ninh T Nguyen; Todd Ponsky; Brian Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Open-source telemedicine platform for wireless medical video communication.

Authors:  A Panayides; I Eleftheriou; M Pantziaris
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2013-03-13
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Telementoring of in-home real-time laparoscopy using whatsapp messenger: An innovative teaching tool during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cohort study.

Authors:  Yeray Trujillo Loli; Mario D'Carlo Trejo Huamán; Stefanie Campos Medina
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-30

2.  SAGES Reimagining Education & Learning (REAL) project.

Authors:  Jonathan Dort; John Paige; Alia Qureshi; Erin Schwarz; Shawn Tsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Preliminary design and evaluation of a remote tele-mentoring system for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Dehlela Shabir; Nihal Abdurahiman; Jhasketan Padhan; Malek Anbatawi; May Trinh; Shidin Balakrishnan; Abdulla Al-Ansari; Elias Yaacoub; Zhigang Deng; Aiman Erbad; Amr Mohammed; Nikhil V Navkar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Overcoming the Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Mentorship: A Scoping Review of Long-distance Mentorship in Surgery.

Authors:  Layne N Raborn; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.