| Literature DB >> 30617397 |
Dandan Yuan1, Ming Cui1, Shuping Yu1, Huimin Wang2, Rongrong Jing3.
Abstract
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) has been widely implemented for molecular testing, but there are still some inherent limitations that hamper its usefulness. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which can provide direct, standards-free quantification, has recently received increasing attention. In our study, a comprehensive comparison of ddPCR with qPCR in relation to the quantification of PML-RARα was performed to evaluate the diagnostic potential of ddPCR. Results showed that ddPCR displayed significant concordance with qPCR in the detection of PML-RARα in clinical samples, but showed advantages over qPCR in terms of precision, limit of detection (LOD), and other basic performance parameters. A study of the feasibility of duplexing also indicated that ddPCR could simultaneously quantify the target PML-RARα and the clinical common reference gene ABL in a reaction, in contrast to qPCR. Moreover, ddPCR was more tolerant than qPCR of inhibition, and was shown to be able to quantify inhibition-prone samples. Another advantage of using ddPCR in clinical applications is that it will yield accurate results for patients with PML-RARα levels that fluctuate around the LOD of qPCR. Therefore, ddPCR is considered to have the potential to become a reliable alternative technique for quantifying PML-RARα. Graphical abstract ᅟ.Entities:
Keywords: Comparison of methods; PML-RARα quantification; ddPCR; qPCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30617397 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1508-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem ISSN: 1618-2642 Impact factor: 4.142