| Literature DB >> 30617148 |
Shi-Jun Deng1, Adekunle Alabi1,2, Hong-Mei Gu1, Ayinuer Adijiang1, Shucun Qin3, Da-Wei Zhang4,2.
Abstract
<span class="Gene">Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (<span class="Gene">PCSK9) promotes LDL receptor (LDLR) degradation, increasing plasma levels of LDL cholesterol and the risk of cardiovascular disease. We have previously shown that, in addition to the epidermal growth factor precursor homology repeat-A of LDLR, at least three ligand-binding repeats (LRs) of LDLR are required for PCSK9-promoted LDLR degradation. However, how exactly the LRs contribute to PCSK9's action on the receptor is not completely understood. Here, we found that substitution of Asp at position 172 in the linker between the LR4 and LR5 of full-length LDLR with Asn (D172N) reduced PCSK9 binding at pH 7.4 (mimic cell surface), but not at pH 6.0 (mimic endosomal environment). On the other hand, mutation of Asp at position 203 in the LR5 of full-length LDLR to Asn (D203N) significantly reduced PCSK9 binding at both pH 7.4 and pH 6.0. D203N also significantly reduced the ability of LDLR to mediate cellular LDL uptake, whereas D172N had no detectable effect. These findings indicate that amino acid residues in the LRs of LDLR play an important role in PCSK9 binding to the receptor.Entities:
Keywords: LDL binding; atherosclerosis; hypercholesterolemia; site-directed mutagenesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30617148 PMCID: PMC6399494 DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M089193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Lipid Res ISSN: 0022-2275 Impact factor: 5.922
Fig. 1.Binding of PCSK9 to the WT and mutated LDLR-ΔLR4-LR7. A: A schematic of the full-length LDLR and LDLR-ΔLR4-LR7 with an enlarged view of the LR1. Negatively charged amino acid residues in the LR1 are shown in bold. C-tail, C-terminal cytoplasmic tail; TM, transmembrane domain. B–D: Binding of PCSK9 to the WT and mutant LDLR-ΔLR4-LR7 at pH 7.4 (B) and pH 6.0 (C) or to the WT and mutant LDLR-ΔLR4-LR7 and full-length LDLR at pH 7.4 (D). HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR-ΔLR4-LR7 or full-length LDLR were incubated with PCSK9 (2 μg/well) at pH 7.4 (B, D) or pH 6.0 (C). The same amount of whole-cell lysate was subjected to immunoblotting. The membrane was cut into halves. The top part was blotted with a monoclonal anti-LDLR Ab and a polyclonal anti-calnexin Ab. The bottom part was blotted with a monoclonal anti-PCSK9 Ab 15A6. The bar charts in B and C were a percentage of the relative densitometry PCSK9 binding signal. It was the percentage of relative densitometry of PCSK9 binding to mutant LDLR to that of PCSK9 binding to the WT LDLR that was defined as 100%. The relative densitometry of PCSK9 binding to LDLR was the ratio of the densitometry of PCSK9 to that of the mature form of LDLR. Values were mean ± SD of three or more experiments. The bottom images were representative ones of protein levels. The top bands of LDLR were the mature and fully glycosylated forms (m). The bottom bands of LDLR were the precursor forms (p). V: Cells were transfected with the empty vector, pCDNA3.1. Similar results were obtained from at least three experiments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
Fig. 2.Binding of PCSK9 to the WT and mutant full-length LDLR. A: A schematic of the full-length LDLR and LDLR-ΔLR4-LR7 with an enlarged view of the LR1, LR4, LR5, and the linker. Negatively charged amino acid residues in the LR4, LR5, and the linker are shown in bold. C-tail, C-terminal cytoplasmic tail; TM, transmembrane domain. B–D: Binding of PCSK9 to the WT and mutant full-length LDLR. The experiments were performed as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Briefly, HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were incubated with PCSK9 (2 μg/ml) on ice at a pH 7.4 (B, C) or pH 6.0 (D) buffer as indicated above. LDLR and PCSK9 were detected by HL-1 and 15A6, respectively. The top bands of LDLR were the mature forms (m). The bottom bands of LDLR were the precursor forms (p). Data shown in the top graph in B and C were quantified as described in the Fig. 1 legend. V: Cells were transfected with the empty vector, pCDNA3.1. Values are mean ± SD of three experiments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01.
Fig. 3.Binding of mutant PCSK9 to the WT and mutant LDLR. A: A schematic of PCSK9. Signal peptide (SP; amino acid residues 1–30); prodomain (PRO; amino acid residues 31–152); catalytical domain (CAT; amino acid residues 153–452); and C-terminal domain (amino acid residues 453–692) with three modules: module 1 (CM1; amino acid residues 457–527), module 2 (CM2; amino acid residues 534–601), and module 3 (CM3; amino acid residues 608–692) (45). B, C: Expression of the WT and mutant PCSK9 in HEK293 cells (B) and culture medium (C). HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant PCSK9 as indicated were collected for the preparation of whole-cell lysate. Culture medium was collected from one 150 mm dish of HEK293 cells transiently transfected with mutant PCSK91–454 or PCSK91–529 and then concentrated using a 3 kDa cutoff centrifugal concentrator (Millipore). The same amount of total proteins of whole-cell lysate (B) or the same amount of concentrated medium (C) were subjected to immunoblotting using a monoclonal anti-PCSK9 Ab 13D3 that recognizes the catalytical domain of PCSK9. m, cleaved mature form of PCSK9 (black arrows); p, the precursor form of PCSK9 (gray arrows). # nonspecific bands; * mature form of PCSK91-529. D: Binding of PCSK91–529 to the WT and mutant LDLR. The experiments were performed as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Briefly, HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were incubated with the same amount of concentrated medium containing PCSK91–529 on ice at pH 7.4 for 4 h. LDLR and PCSK9 were detected by HL-1 and 13D3, respectively. Transferrin receptor (TFR) was detected by its specific monoclonal Ab. V: Cells were transfected with the empty vector, pCDNA3.1. E: Quantified PCSK9 binding data. The relative densitometry of PCSK9 was the ratio of the densitometry of PCSK9 to that of the mature form of LDLR. Values are mean ± SD of three experiments. ** P < 0.01.
Fig. 4.PCSK9-promoted LDLR degradation. A–C: Effects of PCSK9 on LDLR expression. HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were incubated with DMEM in the presence or absence of different amount of PCSK9 (A, 8 μg; B, 6 μg; and C, 4 μg) as indicated at 37°C for 12 h. After washing, whole-cell lysate was prepared, and the same amount of total proteins was subjected to immunoblotting using 15A6 (PCSK9), HL-1 (LDLR), and a monoclonal anti-transferrin receptor (TFR). Similar results were obtained from at least one more experiment.
Fig. 5.Binding of LDL to the WT and mutant LDLR. A, B: Expression of the WT and mutant LDLR in Hepa1c1c7 cells. Briefly, the same amount of total proteins isolated from Hepa1c1c7 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were subjected to immunoblotting using a monoclonal anti-LDLR Ab, HL-1, and a monoclonal anti-actin Ab. The relative densitometry of LDLR was the ratio of the densitometry of LDLR to that of actin. Values were mean ± SD of three experiments. C, D: LDL uptake. Briefly, Hepa1c1c7 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were incubated with Dil-LDL in the presence or absence of LDL. After washing, the fluorescence signal was measured. The relative fluorescence units (RFU) were normalized to total proteins (micrograms). The amount of specific LDL uptake was the difference between the total counts measured in the absence of unlabeled LDL and the counts measured in the presence of an excess of unlabeled LDL (nonspecific background fluorescence).
Fig. 6.Cellular localization of the WT and mutant LDLR. A, B: Biotinylation of cell surface proteins. HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were incubated with Sulfo-(LC)-NHS-biotin. The whole-cell lysate was then prepared and subjected to Neutravidin agarose to pull down biotinylated cell surface proteins. LDLR was detected by HL-1. Calnexin (Cal) and transferrin receptor (TFR) were detected by their specific Abs. V: Cells were transfected with the empty vector, pCDNA3.1. C: Confocal microscopy. HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were fixed, permeabilized, and then incubated with a monoclonal anti-LDLR Ab and a polyclonal anti-Na+-K+-ATPase Ab. Ab binding was visualized with Alexa 568-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (red) and Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (green). Nuclei were visualized with DAPI and shown as blue. An x-y optical section of the cells illustrates the distribution of the WT and mutant proteins between plasma and intracellular membranes (magnification: 100×).
Fig. 7.Binding of PCSK9 to the WT and mutant LDLR. A–C: Effects of mutations of Asp172 (A, B) and Asp203 (C) on PCSK9 binding. The experiments were performed as described in the Fig. 1 legend. Briefly, HEK293 cells transiently expressing the WT or mutant LDLR were incubated with PCSK9 (2 μg/well) at pH 7.4 for 2 h on ice. LDLR and PCSK9 were detected by HL-1 and 15A6, respectively. Actin was detected by a monoclonal Ab. The bottom images were representative ones of protein levels. The top bar chart was a percentage of the relative densitometry of PCSK9 to that of the mature form of LDLR. It was calculated as described in the Fig. 3E legend. V: Cells were transfected with the empty vector, pCDNA3.1. Values were mean ± SD of three or more experiments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.005.