| Literature DB >> 30616871 |
S Meera1, M Vandana Rani1, Cijith Sreedhar1, Delvin T Robin2.
Abstract
Neti kriya is an integral part of shatkarmas/the six cleansing techniques that form the most important aspect of hatha yoga. Neti helps in preventing and managing upper respiratory tract diseases. An attempt is being made to collate and review articles that highlight the therapeutic effects of neti kriya. Databases like PubMed (January 1980-April 2016), Scopus and Ayush Portal were searched. We used keywords like jala neti, neti kriya, neti combined with terms such as yoga, sinusitis, rhinitis, common cold, vision, snoring, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and mental health for the search. As only a few results were obtained, we reviewed relevant studies with saline nasal irrigation. Evidence emerging from this review suggests that neti offers manifold benefits and relief from the antibiotic grip. Most studies support the role of neti in treating sinusitis, rhinosinusitis, allergic conditions and in improving vision. Jala neti has a significant role in improving the presence of mind and intelligence. We identified that it can be applied in mitigating post irradiation rhinosinusitis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, randomized control trials must be conducted to substantiate the therapeutic efficacy of this simple cost-effective, non-pharmacological mode of treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Histamine; Manuka honey; Pratisyaya
Year: 2019 PMID: 30616871 PMCID: PMC7329727 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2018.06.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Major clinical studies reviewed.
| Author & year | Type of trial | Indication | Population | Sample size | Treatment time | Group | Assessment criteria | Major findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uma K (1989) | Randomized controlled study | Mental retardation | Children | 90 | 1 year | 1 – Pranayama, jala neti, loosening exercises suryanamaskar, yogasanas, meditation | IQ, social adaptation parameters | Improved mental ability, psychomotor coordination, intelligence, social behavior |
| Georgitis JW (1994) | Cross over design | Active allergic rhinitis | Adults | 30 | At weekly intervals – 1 month | 1 – Heated vapor treatments at 41 °C for 20 min | Nasal secretions collected after each treatment at 30 min, 2, 4 and 6 h | Histamine and leukotriene concentration decreased, reduced histamine for 6 h after a single 15-min treatment |
| Shoseyov D (1998) | Randomized double blind study | Chronic sinusitis | Children | 30 | 4 weeks | Hypertonic Saline group (HS) with hypertonic saline (3.5%) | Cough and nasal secretions/postnasal drip PND radiology score | Reduced cough, nasal secretion in HS group |
| Tamooka LT (2000) | Prospective controlled clinical study | Sinonasal disease | Adults | 231 | Twice daily – 6 weeks | Treatment group-nasal irrigation using hypertonic saline delivered by Water pik device | Nasal disease specific questionnaire | Reduced nasal symptom and improved health status |
| Heatley DG (2001) | Randomized controlled clinical trial | Chronic sinusitis | Adults | 150 | 2 weeks | 1 – Nasal irrigation with bulb syringe | Rhinosinusitis outcome measure 31 score | Improvement in symptoms in 70% subjects, decreased medicine use in 35% subjects irrespective of device |
| Rabago D (2002) | Randomized controlled trial | Sinusitis | Adult | 76 | 6 months | 1 – Hypertonic saline solution – daily practice | Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form, Rhinosinusitis Disability Index, Single-Item Sinus-Symptom Severity Assessment (SIA) | Symptoms reduced and decreased use of medicines |
| Tano L (2004) | Randomized controlled clinical trial | Rhinitis | Adult | 69 | 20 weeks study | 10 weeks – daily saline nasal spray | Self-recording of symptoms in diary | Lesser attacks of upper respiratory tract infections |
| Thamboo A (2011) | Randomized, single-blind, prospective study | Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis | Adults | 34 | 30 days | 2 mL of a 50/50 mixture of honey–saline solution in a nostril, other nostril as control | Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) | Symptomatic relief, high IgE levels in MH application |
| Jeefe JS (2012) | Survey | Nasal congestion rhinorrhea from sinusitis, chronic allergic rhinitis | Children | 61 | 4 months | Nasal saline irrigation | Parental questionnaires | Improvement in symptoms, mild side effects: ear pain, cough, nausea |
| Bhansal C (2014) | Comparative study | Myopia | Adults | 60 | 3 months – follow up after 1 month | Group A – intake of saptamrita lauha, | Visual acuity, dioptric power, symptomatic scoring | Reduced eye pain, eye strain watering of eyes and heaviness of eyes in Group B |
| Luo H-H (2014) | Randomized clinical study | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | Adults | 1134 | 2 years, | A – nasal irrigator | Quality of life using SNOT-20 | Nasal symptoms reduced, improved QOL |
| Lin SY (2015) | Case series | Chronic rhinosinusitis | Children | 10 | 1 month | Nasal saline lavage once a day | Sinus and Nasal Quality of Life Survey (SN-5), overall nasal quality-of-life (NQL) | Reduction in symptoms, improvement the quality of life |
| Lee VS (2016) | Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial | Chronic rhinosinusitis | Adults | 42 | 30 days | 1 – Manuka honey (MH)irrigation/Saline nasal(SAL) irrigation with oral antibiotics/steroids | Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) change score (primary), culture negativity, Lund–Kennedy endoscopic change score | Culture negativity statistically better on MH compared to SAL in patients not receiving antibiotics |