Literature DB >> 30616782

Extranodal extension is a criterion for poor outcome in patients with metastatic nodes from cancer of the nasopharynx.

Qi-Yong Ai1, Ann D King2, Darren M C Poon3, Frankie K F Mo3, Edwin P Hui3, Macy Tong3, Anil T Ahuja1, Brigette B Y Ma3, Anthony T C Chan3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extranodal extension (ENE) is a criterion for advanced nodal staging of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Our aim was to determine if ENE should be a staging criterion for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS &
METHODS: MRI of 546 NPC patients were reviewed retrospectively and in 404/546 (74.0%) with metastatic nodes, the nodes were assessed for ENE (grade 0 = absent; grade 1 = infiltration of surrounding fat; grade 2 = infiltration of muscle/skin), size (total volume), site (unilateral/bilateral and upper/lower neck) and necrosis. Associations between nodal features and regional relapse free survival (RRFS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using cox regression. Differences of survival rates were compared using log-rank test. A p-value of < 0.05 indicates statistical significance.
RESULTS: ENE grade was the only determinant of RRFS (p = 0.014) and only independent determinant of DMFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p < 0.001). Grade 2 ENE was associated with significantly poorer RRFS, DMFS and OS compared to grade 0 and 1 (p < 0.05). Addition of grade 2 ENE to N1 and N2 disease showed similar poor RRFS, DMFS and OS to N3 disease (p > 0.05). Compared to the current stage N3 disease, inclusion of grade 2 ENE increased the number of N3 patients from 53/546 (9.7%) to 82/546 (15.0%) with similar hazard ratios for DMFS (6.855 and 7.125, respectively) and OS (3.614 and 4.085, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Grade 2 ENE (into muscle and/or skin and/or salivary glands) is an independent indicator of poor outcome and may be considered as a new criterion for N3 nodal disease in NPC.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extranodal extension; Head and neck cancers; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nasopharyngeal cancer; Nodal staging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30616782     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of cervical nodal necrosis on staging imaging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qi-Yong H Ai; Kuo Feng Hung; Tiffany Y So; Frankie K F Mo; Wing Tsung Anthony Chin; Edwin P Hui; Brigette B Y Ma; Michael Ying; Ann D King
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.605

Review 2.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Kenneth C W Wong; Edwin P Hui; Kwok-Wai Lo; Wai Kei Jacky Lam; David Johnson; Lili Li; Qian Tao; Kwan Chee Allen Chan; Ka-Fai To; Ann D King; Brigette B Y Ma; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  How is neck dissection performed in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery? Results of a representative nationwide survey among university and non-university hospitals in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Pabst; Daniel G E Thiem; Elisabeth Goetze; Alexander K Bartella; Michael T Neuhaus; Jürgen Hoffmann; Alexander-N Zeller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Pattern and prognosis of distant metastases in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A large-population retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Weiling Qu; Sihan Li; Miao Zhang; Qiao Qiao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Patterns and Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Metastasis on Distant Metastasis and Survival in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Study, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Yali Xu; Taoyuan Huang; Liqin Fan; Wei Jin; Xiaoming Chen; Jinhai Chen
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.375

6.  Development and validation of radiologic scores for guiding individualized induction chemotherapy in T3N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Yang; Yi-Shan Wu; Pu-Yun OuYang; Fang-Yun Xie; Ya-Jun Pang; Su-Ming Xiao; Bao-Yu Zhang; Zhi-Qiao Liu; En-Ni Chen; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  A comparative study of functional MRI in predicting response of regional nodes to induction chemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Dawei Zhao; Xuemei Fang; Wenjun Fan; Lingling Meng; Yanrong Luo; Nanxiang Chen; Jinfeng Li; Xiao Zang; Meng Li; Xingdong Guo; Biyang Cao; Chenchen Wu; Xin Tan; Boning Cai; Lin Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  A Nomogram to Identify the Optimal Candidates for Induction Chemotherapy in Advanced N-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Jiang; Kai-Hua Chen; Zhong-Guo Liang; Jie Yang; Song Qu; Ling Li; Xiao-Dong Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.602

9.  Clinical significance of extranodal extension in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Xia Yang; XiaoXi Ma; Wentao Yang; Ruohong Shui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Value of Cervical Node Features in Predicting Long-Term Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era.

Authors:  Li Bai; Fei Han; Yun-Ming Tian; Lei Zeng; Yu-Hong Lan; Xia Yuan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.