Jinzhen Song 1 , Zida Ma 2 , Jianbo Huang 3 , Yan Luo 1 , Romanas Zykus 4 , Ashish Kumar 5 , Matthew Kitson 6 , Qiang Lu 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transient elastography-based liver stiffness value (TE-LSV) has been studied for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Liver stiffness is influenced by the disease etiology. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to determine the performance of TE-LSV for diagnosing portal hypertension in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid and Cochrane library. A bivariate model was used to compute sensitivity and specificity. A random effects model was used to pool diagnostic odds ratios. RESULTS: 9 studies with 679 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity based on a cut-off value around 21.8 kPa for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) were 0.89 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.83-0.93) and 0.71(95 % CI, 0.64-0.78), respectively. For severe portal hypertension (SPH), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for a cut-off value around 29.1 kPa were 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI, 0.67-0.81), respectively. CONCLUSION: TE-LSV showed good performance for diagnosing portal hypertension in patients with ALD. The optimal cut-off value for CSPH and SPH was around 21.8 kPa and 29.1 kPa, respectively, and these two cut-off values showed good sensitivity and modest specificity. The etiology should be clear before using TE-LSV for portal hypertension. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: Transient elastography-based liver stiffness value (TE-LSV) has been studied for the diagnosis of portal hypertension. Liver stiffness is influenced by the disease etiology. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to determine the performance of TE-LSV for diagnosing portal hypertension in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid and Cochrane library. A bivariate model was used to compute sensitivity and specificity. A random effects model was used to pool diagnostic odds ratios. RESULTS: 9 studies with 679 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity based on a cut-off value around 21.8 kPa for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) were 0.89 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.83-0.93) and 0.71(95 % CI, 0.64-0.78), respectively. For severe portal hypertension (SPH), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for a cut-off value around 29.1 kPa were 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI, 0.67-0.81), respectively. CONCLUSION: TE-LSV showed good performance for diagnosing portal hypertension in patients with ALD. The optimal cut-off value for CSPH and SPH was around 21.8 kPa and 29.1 kPa, respectively, and these two cut-off values showed good sensitivity and modest specificity. The etiology should be clear before using TE-LSV for portal hypertension. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Chemical
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2019
PMID: 30616265 DOI: 10.1055/a-0731-0178
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultraschall Med ISSN: 0172-4614 Impact factor: 6.548