Literature DB >> 30615535

Top-Funded Digital Health Companies And Their Impact On High-Burden, High-Cost Conditions.

Kyan Safavi1, Simon C Mathews2, David W Bates3, E Ray Dorsey4, Adam B Cohen5.   

Abstract

Digital health companies hold promise to address major health care challenges, though little has been published on their impact. We identified the twenty top-funded private US-based digital health companies to analyze their products and services, related peer-reviewed evidence, and the potential for impact on patients with high-burden conditions. Data analytics (including artificial intelligence and big data) was the most common company type. Companies producing biosensors had the greatest funding. Publications were concentrated among a small number of companies. Healthy volunteers were most commonly studied. Few studies enrolled high-burden populations, and few measured their impact in terms of outcomes, cost, or access to care. These data suggest that leading digital health companies have not yet demonstrated substantial impact on disease burden or cost in the US health care system. Our findings indicate the importance of fostering an environment, with regard to policy and the consumer market, that encourages the development of evidence-based, high-impact products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30615535     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  25 in total

Review 1.  The Digital Neurologic Examination.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Brain V Nahed
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 2.  Navigating the Digital Health Ecosystem to Bridge the Gap from Innovation to Transformation: A NODE. Health Perspective on Digital Evidence.

Authors:  Brian Van Winkle; Yauheni Solad; Nitin Vaswani; Benjamin I Rosner
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2019-06-25

Review 3.  Wearables for Neurologic Conditions: Considerations for Our Patients and Research Limitations.

Authors:  Mia T Minen; Eric J Stieglitz
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-08

Review 4.  Aligning mission to digital health strategy in academic medical centers.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Lisa Stump; Harlan M Krumholz; Margaret Cartiera; Sanchita Jain; L Scott Sussman; Allen Hsiao; Walter Lindop; Anita Kuo Ying; Rebecca L Kaul; Thomas J Balcezak; Welela Tereffe; Matthew Comerford; Daniel Jacoby; Neema Navai
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Assessing the Clinical Robustness of Digital Health Startups: Cross-sectional Observational Analysis.

Authors:  Sean Day; Veeraj Shah; Sari Kaganoff; Shannon Powelson; Simon C Mathews
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 7.076

6.  Remotely Conducted App-Based Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Risk Awareness and Prevention: Single-Group Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Vera Helen Buss; Marlien Varnfield; Mark Harris; Margo Barr
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 7.  The digital transformation of hepatology: The patient is logged in.

Authors:  Tiffany Wu; Douglas A Simonetto; John D Halamka; Vijay H Shah
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 17.298

8.  Review of Popularity and Quality Standards of Opioid-Related Smartphone Apps.

Authors:  Roger Vilardaga; Tykira Fisher; Paige E Palenski; Viggy Kumaresan; Paolo Mannelli; Maggie M Sweitzer; Francis Joseph McClernon; Matthew M Engelhard; Patricia L Sabo; Kathleen A Garrison
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2020-11-10

9.  Digital health & low-value care.

Authors:  Monica O'Reilly-Jacob; Penny Mohr; Moriah Ellen; Carolyn Petersen; Catherine Sarkisian; Sharon Attipoe; Eugene Rich
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2021-03-11

10.  Generating value with mental health apps.

Authors:  Adam C Powell; John B Torous; Joseph Firth; Kenneth R Kaufman
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2020-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.