BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Visible lesions (VLs) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) are seen in 70% to 90% of patients presenting for endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). It is not known if there are any differences in outcomes of patients with flat dysplasia versus patients with VL. Our aim was to assess outcomes of EET in BE patients with VL and BE patients with flat dysplasia. STUDY: This is a single center study with data drawn from a prospective registry of patients referred for EET of BE between 2011 and 2015. Demographic data, endoscopic findings, histologic findings, and response to EET were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 264 patients of which 34 had flat dysplasia, 180 had VL before initiating EET (prevalent lesions) and 50 who developed VL during EET (incident lesions). Compared with patients with flat dysplasia, patients with VL had longer segments of BE (5 vs. 4 cm, P=0.002) and greater prevalence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (63.6% vs. 29.4%, P<0.001). Incident lesions are less likely to harbor HGD/EAC compared with prevalent lesions (28.1% vs. 61.8%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in eradication of metaplasia/dysplasia between the groups. No progression or recurrences were observed in flat dysplasia group. In VL group, 14 patients progressed (prevalent VL=11, incident VL=3) and 15 had recurrences (prevalent VL=11, incident VL=4). CONCLUSIONS: About 19% of BE patients developed VL during EET. There is higher prevalence of HGD/EAC in prevalent VL compared with incident VL. However, the outcomes did not differ.
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Visible lesions (VLs) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) are seen in 70% to 90% of patients presenting for endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). It is not known if there are any differences in outcomes of patients with flat dysplasia versus patients with VL. Our aim was to assess outcomes of EET in BE patients with VL and BE patients with flat dysplasia. STUDY: This is a single center study with data drawn from a prospective registry of patients referred for EET of BE between 2011 and 2015. Demographic data, endoscopic findings, histologic findings, and response to EET were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 264 patients of which 34 had flat dysplasia, 180 had VL before initiating EET (prevalent lesions) and 50 who developed VL during EET (incident lesions). Compared with patients with flat dysplasia, patients with VL had longer segments of BE (5 vs. 4 cm, P=0.002) and greater prevalence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) (63.6% vs. 29.4%, P<0.001). Incident lesions are less likely to harbor HGD/EAC compared with prevalent lesions (28.1% vs. 61.8%, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in eradication of metaplasia/dysplasia between the groups. No progression or recurrences were observed in flat dysplasia group. In VL group, 14 patients progressed (prevalent VL=11, incident VL=3) and 15 had recurrences (prevalent VL=11, incident VL=4). CONCLUSIONS: About 19% of BE patients developed VL during EET. There is higher prevalence of HGD/EAC in prevalent VL compared with incident VL. However, the outcomes did not differ.
Authors: Rehan J Haidry; Jason M Dunn; Mohammed A Butt; Matthew G Burnell; Abhinav Gupta; Sarah Green; Haroon Miah; Howard L Smart; Pradeep Bhandari; Lesley Ann Smith; Robert Willert; Grant Fullarton; John Morris; Massimo Di Pietro; Charles Gordon; Ian Penman; Hugh Barr; Praful Patel; Philip Boger; Neel Kapoor; Brinder Mahon; Jonathon Hoare; Ravi Narayanasamy; Dermot O'Toole; Edward Cheong; Natalie C Direkze; Yeng Ang; Marco Novelli; Matthew R Banks; Laurence Bruce Lovat Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: K Nadine Phoa; Roos E Pouw; Frederike G I van Vilsteren; Carine M T Sondermeijer; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Mike Visser; Sybren L Meijer; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Bas L A M Weusten; Erik J Schoon; Rosalie C Mallant-Hent; Jacques J G H M Bergman Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: N S Buttar; K K Wang; T J Sebo; D M Riehle; K K Krishnadath; L S Lutzke; M A Anderson; T M Petterson; L J Burgart Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: N Li; S Pasricha; W J Bulsiewicz; R E Pruitt; S Komanduri; H C Wolfsen; G W Chmielewski; F S Corbett; K J Chang; N J Shaheen Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: K Nadine Phoa; Roos E Pouw; Raf Bisschops; Oliver Pech; Krish Ragunath; Bas L A M Weusten; Brigitte Schumacher; Bjorn Rembacken; Alexander Meining; Helmut Messmann; Erik J Schoon; Liebwin Gossner; Jayan Mannath; C A Seldenrijk; Mike Visser; Toni Lerut; Stefan Seewald; Fiebo J ten Kate; Christian Ell; Horst Neuhaus; Jacques J G H M Bergman Journal: Gut Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Cary C Cotton; W Asher Wolf; Bergein F Overholt; Nan Li; Charles J Lightdale; Herbert C Wolfsen; Sarina Pasricha; Kenneth K Wang; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Milli Gupta; Prasad G Iyer; Lori Lutzke; Emmanuel C Gorospe; Julian A Abrams; Gary W Falk; Gregory G Ginsberg; Anil K Rustgi; Charles J Lightdale; Timothy C Wang; David I Fudman; John M Poneros; Kenneth K Wang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 22.682