Literature DB >> 3061472

Feedback delays and relaxation expectancies in EMG biofeedback.

B R Monsma1, A G Glaros, M A Lumley.   

Abstract

The use of noncontingent feedback controls in studies of the efficacy and process of electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback may yield results confounded by differential expectancies for relaxation. Furthermore, the role of expectancies in producing psychological and physical relaxation as well as reducing muscle activity is unclear. This study investigated the effects of feedback delays and induced relaxation expectancies on EMG activity and experienced relaxation. One hundred four non-clinical subjects participated in one auditory frontal EMG biofeedback training session. Subjects were assigned to one of four computerized feedback delay conditions (0.0037, 0.7493, 2.2481, 6.7444 s) and to one of two relaxation expectancy conditions (positive or negative). During 20 minutes of biofeedback training, all groups decreased frontal activity. Feedback delays interacted with training epochs in affecting EMG; the longest delay group reduced frontal activity more slowly than the shortest delay group during training. Positive relaxation expectancies produced greater experienced relaxation than did negative relaxation expectancies. Instrumental and expectancy factors in EMG biofeedback appear to operate independently of each other by reducing physiological activity and producing psychological relaxation respectively.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3061472     DOI: 10.1007/bf01001495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  12 in total

1.  An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.

Authors:  T H Budzynski; J M Stoyva
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

2.  Effect of contingent and noncontingent feedback and subject expectancies on electroencephalogram biofeedback training.

Authors:  J A Pressner; J C Savitsky
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1977-08

3.  Feedback parameters of electromyographic learning.

Authors:  R T Rubow; K U Smith
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1971-06

4.  Presidential address, 1976. A monologue on biofeedback and psychophysiology.

Authors:  D Shapiro
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Cognitive and physiologic responses to EMG biofeedback and three types of pseudofeedback during a muscular relaxation task.

Authors:  J P Hatch; K Klatt; M Fitzgerald; L S Jasheway; J G Fisher
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1983-09

6.  Change mechanisms in EMG biofeedback training: cognitive changes underlying improvements in tension headache.

Authors:  K A Holroyd; D B Penzien; K G Hursey; D L Tobin; L Rogers; J E Holm; P J Marcille; J R Hall; A G Chila
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1984-12

7.  Controlled group designs in biofeedback research: ask, "What does the control group control for?".

Authors:  J P Hatch
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1982-09

8.  Effects of alternative control procedures for electromyographic biofeedback relaxation training.

Authors:  J J Kiffer; A J Fridlund; S C Fowler
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1981-06

9.  Expectancies of reinforcement control in biofeedback and cognitive performance.

Authors:  J G Carlson; J L Feld
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1981-03

10.  Experimenter expectancy effects in frontal EMG conditioning.

Authors:  J Segreto-Bures; H Kotses
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.