Literature DB >> 30614517

No association between MRI changes in the lumbar spine and intensity of pain, quality of life, depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with low back pain.

Anna Babińska1, Wojciech Wawrzynek1, Elżbieta Czech2, Jarosław Skupiński1, Jarosław Szczygieł3, Beata Łabuz-Roszak4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The association between changes in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical symptoms in patients with low back pain (LBP) is unclear. AIM: To evaluate correlations between combined MRI findings of the lumbar spine (LS) and pain intensity, depressive and anxiety symptoms and quality of life in patients with LBP.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 200 subjects (93 men and 107 women; mean age 51.42 ± 13.21 years) with LBP referred for MRI were enrolled in the study. All patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Quality of Life Scales (EQ-5D, EQ-VAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). MRI scans were assessed according to a scoring system prepared by the authors, and the total MRI score was calculated.
RESULTS: The mean total MRI score was 11.59 ± 6.73 points (range 0-50 points) and was higher in men than in women (p = 0.015). A correlation was observed between total MRI score and age (p < 0.001) and between total MRI score and BMI (p = 0.005). An association was found between total MRI score and EQ-5D (p = 0.012) and HADS-D results (p = 0.003). VAS and HADS-A results did not correlate with MRI score. When multivariate analysis was done, the total MRI score was only significantly related to age and BMI, and association between the total MRI score and EQ-5D or HADS-D results was not confirmed. Decreased quality of life was associated with increased intensity of pain and depressive and anxiety symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined MRI changes in LS do not correlate with pain intensity, depressive and anxiety syndromes or quality of life in patients with LBP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI examination; anxiety; depressive symptoms; low back pain; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30614517     DOI: 10.5603/PJNNS.a2018.0006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Neurochir Pol        ISSN: 0028-3843            Impact factor:   1.621


  6 in total

1.  Wearable sensor technology in spine care.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; R Dineth Fonseka; Pragadesh Natarajan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Restorative Neurostimulation: A Clinical Guide for Therapy Adoption.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; David Lee; Jennifer Tram; Samir Sheth; Robert Heros; Smith Manion; Vikas Patel; Kyle Kiesel; Yousef Ghandour; Christopher Gilligan
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Associations between Paraspinal Muscle Morphology, Disc Degeneration, and Clinical Features in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Takahiro Miki; Fujita Naoki; Hiroyuki Takashima; Tsuneo Takebayashi
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2020-07-15

4.  Quality of life for kidney transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients in Palestine: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Adnan Lutfi Sarhan; Raya H Jarareh; Mujahed Shraim
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Self-Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain Based on a Rapid and Objective Sacroiliac Asymmetry Test: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Helene Bertrand; K Dean Reeves; Rajneet Mattu; Remerlita Garcia; Mahir Mohammed; Ellen Wiebe; An-Lin Cheng
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  Evaluation criteria for the assessment of occupational diseases of the lumbar spine - how reliable are they?

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Julia Wölfle-Roos; Tugrul Kocak; Alexander Brunner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.