Literature DB >> 30614284

Quality measures improving endoscopic screening of colorectal cancer: a review of the literature.

Marcello Maida1, Gaetano Morreale1, Emanuele Sinagra2, Gianluca Ianiro3, Vito Margherita4, Alfonso Cirrone Cipolla4, Salvatore Camilleri1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health-care problem all over the world and CRC screening is effective in reducing mortality and increasing the 5-year survival. Colonoscopy has a central role in CRC screening. It can be performed as a primary test, as a recall policy after a positive result of another screening test, and for surveillance. Since effectiveness of endoscopic screening depends on adequate detection and removal of colonic polyps, consistent quality measures, which are useful in enhancing the diagnostic yield of examination, are essential. Areas covered: The aim of this review is to analyze current evidence from literature supporting quality measures able to refine endoscopic screening of colorectal cancer. Expert commentary: Quality measures namely a) time slot allotted to colonoscopy, b) assessment of indication, c) bowel preparation, d) Cecal intubation, e) withdrawal time, f) adenoma detection rate, g) proper management of lesions (polypectomy technique, polyps retrieval rate and tattooing of resection sites), and h) adequate follow-up intervals play a key role in identifying malignant and at-risk lesions and improving the outcome of screening. Adherence to these quality measures is critical to maximize the effectiveness of CRC screening, as well as, a proper technique of colonoscopy and a quality report of the procedure. Among all recommended measures, adenoma detection rate is the most important and must be kept above the recommended quality threshold by all physicians practicing in the setting of screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; colonscopy; quality measures; screening; surveillance

Year:  2019        PMID: 30614284     DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1565999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther        ISSN: 1473-7140            Impact factor:   4.512


  4 in total

1.  Impact of photodocumentation of caecal intubation on colonoscopy outcomes.

Authors:  Brendan Moran; Rishabh Sehgal; Neil O'Morain; Eoin Slattery; Chris Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Does Fellow Participation Increase the Adenoma Detection Rate?

Authors:  Emanuele Sinagra; Rita Alloro; Ilaria Tarantino
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Polyp Detection from Colorectum Images by Using Attentive YOLOv5.

Authors:  Jingjing Wan; Bolun Chen; Yongtao Yu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 4.  Use of artificial intelligence in improving adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: Might both endoscopists and pathologists be further helped.

Authors:  Emanuele Sinagra; Matteo Badalamenti; Marcello Maida; Marco Spadaccini; Roberta Maselli; Francesca Rossi; Giuseppe Conoscenti; Dario Raimondo; Socrate Pallio; Alessandro Repici; Andrea Anderloni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.