| Literature DB >> 30614236 |
Luiz Sergio Almeida Camargo1, Michele Munk2, Jose Nelio Sales3, Sabine Wohlres-Viana2, Carolina Capobiango Romano Quintão1, João Henrique Moreira Viana4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In vitro maturation has been shown to influence gene expression in oocytes, but a common shortcoming in reports on the matter has been the use of different donors in each experimental group thus disregarding donor effects. This study aimed to investigate the abundance of mRNA in oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro obtained from the same group of donors.Entities:
Keywords: gene expression; in vivo maturation; mRNA; ovum pick-up
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30614236 PMCID: PMC6364282 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod ISSN: 1517-5693
Primer sequences used for relative gene expression analysis by real-time polymerase chain reaction
| Gene | Primer sequences (5’–3’) | Annealing (ºC) | Fragment size (bp) | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 64 | 174 | NM_173894 | |
| Reverse: CAGCTGCGATCATCCTCTGCAG | ||||
|
| 53 | 120 | NM_001166486 | |
| Reverse: CAGCCAGGAGAAATCAAACA | ||||
|
| 52 | 224 | NM_174431 | |
| Reverse: CCTTGTTTCTTGGGTGTGTTG | ||||
|
| 59 | 275 | NM_174550 | |
| Reverse: TCCTTCTCCGCCAAGGTGTTG | ||||
|
| 53 | 120 | NM_174681 | |
| Reverse: AGCAGATCCACTGATGGAA | ||||
|
| 53 | 206 | NM_001007814 | |
| Reverse: GCGGTTCTCAGGTTCTTCAG | ||||
|
| 53 | 188 | NM_001076203 | |
| Reverse: TCACAGGATAGGCGTTTGC | ||||
|
| 53 | 147 | NM_001034772 | |
| Reverse: AAACAGGGACCACTGACAGG | ||||
|
| 53 | 205 | NM_173979 | |
| Reverse: ACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGGAC |
Figure 1Relative abundance of transcripts from different genes of in vivo-matured (IN VIVO-OPU) and in vitro-matured (IN VITRO-OPU) bovine oocytes derived from the same donors. Transcript level of in vivo-matured oocytes was used as calibrator (relative abundance = 1.00). Data show as mean ± SEM. (*) Asterisk indicates difference between IN VIVO-OPU and IN VITRO-OPU groups (p<0.05)
Figure 2Relative abundance of transcripts from different genes of in vivo-matured (IN VIVO-OPU) and in vitro-matured (IN VITRO-Abattoir) bovine oocytes derived from different donors. Transcript level of in vivo-matured oocytes was used as calibrator (relative abundance = 1.00). Data are show as mean ± SEM. (*) Asterisk indicates difference between IN VIVO-OPU and IN VITRO–Abattoir groups (p<0.05)
Figure 3Relative abundance of transcripts from different genes of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes derived from different donors, collected by means of OPU (IN VITRO-OPU) or by post-mortem follicular aspiration (IN VITRO-Abattoir). Transcript level of IN VITRO-OPU oocytes was used as calibrator (relative abundance = 1.00). Data are show as mean ± SEM. (*) Asterisk indicates difference between IN VITRO-OPU and IN VITRO–Abattoir groups (p<0.05)