PURPOSE: Children with brain tumors (BT) are at risk for difficulties with social functioning. Research to date has focused on deficits, with no studies identifying areas of strength or resilience. Our objective was to assess the potential influence of connectedness on social functioning in youth with BT as compared with children with other cancers. METHODS: Children with cancer (20 with BT, 33 with other diagnoses) were enrolled on a longitudinal study of psychosocial functioning. The current study included measures from time 2 (+1 year after enrollment; Mage = 13.11 ± 2.31, Mtimesincediagnosis = 4.95 ± 3.74 years) and time 3 (+3 years after enrollment; Mage = 14.98 ± 2.36, Mtimesincediagnosis = 6.82 ± 3.81 years). Youth completed the Hemingway Measure of Adolescent Connectedness (HMAC) at time 2. Two years later, social functioning was assessed by the self- and proxy-report versions of the Social-Emotional Assets and Resilience Scale (SEARS). RESULTS: Youth with BT perceived that they were less connected to friends (t(50) = -2.13, P = 0.04), but similarly connected to peers as youth with other cancers. Youth with BT also demonstrated lower social functioning by self- and parent report. Connectedness to friends significantly mediated the relationship between diagnostic category and self-reported social functioning, such that youth with BT who reported being more connected to friends also indicated greater social functioning. Analyses using connectedness to peers and/or parent-reported social functioning were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Perceiving a connection to a friend may be a protective factor that could mitigate deficits in social functioning in youth with BT. Additional research is needed to further assess the potential benefits of this construct.
PURPOSE:Children with brain tumors (BT) are at risk for difficulties with social functioning. Research to date has focused on deficits, with no studies identifying areas of strength or resilience. Our objective was to assess the potential influence of connectedness on social functioning in youth with BT as compared with children with other cancers. METHODS:Children with cancer (20 with BT, 33 with other diagnoses) were enrolled on a longitudinal study of psychosocial functioning. The current study included measures from time 2 (+1 year after enrollment; Mage = 13.11 ± 2.31, Mtimesincediagnosis = 4.95 ± 3.74 years) and time 3 (+3 years after enrollment; Mage = 14.98 ± 2.36, Mtimesincediagnosis = 6.82 ± 3.81 years). Youth completed the Hemingway Measure of Adolescent Connectedness (HMAC) at time 2. Two years later, social functioning was assessed by the self- and proxy-report versions of the Social-Emotional Assets and Resilience Scale (SEARS). RESULTS: Youth with BT perceived that they were less connected to friends (t(50) = -2.13, P = 0.04), but similarly connected to peers as youth with other cancers. Youth with BT also demonstrated lower social functioning by self- and parent report. Connectedness to friends significantly mediated the relationship between diagnostic category and self-reported social functioning, such that youth with BT who reported being more connected to friends also indicated greater social functioning. Analyses using connectedness to peers and/or parent-reported social functioning were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Perceiving a connection to a friend may be a protective factor that could mitigate deficits in social functioning in youth with BT. Additional research is needed to further assess the potential benefits of this construct.
Authors: Kristen E Robinson; John F Kuttesch; Jennifer E Champion; Charissa F Andreotti; Dana W Hipp; Alexandra Bettis; Anna Barnwell; Bruce E Compas Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Christina G Salley; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Diane L Fairclough; Andrea F Patenaude; Mary J Kupst; Maru Barrera; Kathryn Vannatta Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Matthew C Hocking; Mark McCurdy; Elise Turner; Anne E Kazak; Robert B Noll; Peter Phillips; Lamia P Barakat Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Matthew J Krasin; Wei Liu; Gregory T Armstrong; Rohit P Ojha; Zsila S Sadighi; Pankaj Gupta; Cara Kimberg; Deokumar Srivastava; Thomas E Merchant; Amar Gajjar; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Allison P Fisher; Jamie Patronick; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Krestin Radonovich; Ralph Salloum; Shari L Wade Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Yuliang Wang; Anthony Pak Yin Liu; Tatia Mei-Chun Lee; Wilfred Hing Sang Wong; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Lok Kan Leung; Matthew Ming Kong Shing; Dennis Tak-Loi Ku; Godfrey Chi-Fung Chan; Winnie Wan-Yee Tso Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 6.575