| Literature DB >> 30614168 |
Seo Ryeong Kim1, Sang Won Kwak1,2, Ju-Kyung Lee1, Hye-Jin Goo1, Jung-Hong Ha2, Hyeon-Cheol Kim1.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the efficiency of root canal filling procedures and the retrievability of the filling material with various sealers. Forty-three patients assigned to endodontic treatment with (i) continuous wave of condensation technique (CTW) with AH-plus (ii) single-cone technique (SCT) with EndoSeal MTA. The spent time, voids entrapping and postoperative symptoms were evaluated. To evaluate the retrievability, mandibular premolar (n = 60) were divided into four groups: AH-plus/CTW, EndoSeal MTA/SCT, MTA Fillapex/SCT and EndoSequence BC Sealer/SCT. The time required removing the filled materials and remnant score were examined. EndoSeal MTA/SCT showed significantly shorter time of filling procedure. The number of void did not show significant differences between two techniques. No patients showed clinical signs during the follow-up periods. There were no significant differences between group AH-plus and EndoSeal MTA for remnant score. A certain calcium silicate-based sealer with SCT may give similar clinical efficiencies as much as continuous-wave technique using AH-plus sealer.Entities:
Keywords: calcium silicate; removal; retreatment; root canal filling; sealer; single-cone technique
Year: 2019 PMID: 30614168 DOI: 10.1111/aej.12323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aust Endod J ISSN: 1329-1947 Impact factor: 1.659