| Literature DB >> 30614165 |
Lauren E Jensen1, Sarah Murphy2, Anne E Williamson1, Fabricio B Teixeira1, William T Johnson1, Christopher C Friedl1, Ove A Peters2,3.
Abstract
A comparison of the preparation ability of two root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals using micro-computed tomography was undertaken. Thirty extracted, single-rooted, human mandibular premolars with radiographically similar canal morphology were selected, allocated to two groups (N = 15) and prepared with TRUShape or Vortex Blue (VB). Each sample was subjected to three scans (20 μm resolution): pre-preparation and after preparation to sizes #30 and #40. Three-dimensional data sets were evaluated for canal volume, surface area and surface treatment. Matched axial slices in apical, middle and coronal root thirds were evaluated for cross-sectional area, roundness and transportation. Preparation with both instruments increased canal volumes and surface areas similarly and significantly (P < 0.001) with no significant difference between groups. TRUShape significantly enhanced surface treatment at both apical sizes (P < 0.05). Transportation exceeded 100 μm in only eight out of 90 cross sections. Both instruments performed similarly during preparation. TRUShape, however, significantly enhanced surface treatment.Entities:
Keywords: TRUShape; canal transportation; micro-computed tomography; treated canal surface
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30614165 DOI: 10.1111/aej.12322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aust Endod J ISSN: 1329-1947 Impact factor: 1.659