| Literature DB >> 30612444 |
Mimi M Kim1, Ann Cheney2, Anita Black3, Roland J Thorpe4, Crystal Wiley Cene3, Guarav J Dave3, Jennifer Schaal3, Stefanie Vassar5, Corrine Ruktanonchai6, Leah Frerichs3, Tiffany Young3, Jennifer Jones7, Jessica Burke7, Deepthi Varma6, Catherine Striley6, Linda Cottler6, Arleen Brown5, Greer Sullivan2, Giselle Corbie-Smith3.
Abstract
Community-engaged research (CEnR) builds on the strengths of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) framework to address health in underserved and minority communities. There is a paucity of studies that identify the process from which trust develops in CEnR partnerships. This study responds to the need for empirical investigation of building and maintaining trust from a multistakeholder perspective. We conducted a multi-institutional pilot study using concept mapping with to better understand how trust, a critical outcome of CEnR partnerships, can act as "social capital." Concept mapping was used to collect data from the three stakeholder groups: community, health-care, and academic research partners across three CTSAs. Concept mapping is a mixed-methods approach that allows participants to brainstorm and identify factors that contribute to a concept and describe ways in which those factors relate to each other. This study offers important insights on developing an initial set of trust measures that can be used across CTSAs to understand differences and similarities in conceptualization of trust among key stakeholder groups, track changes in public trust in research, identify both positive and negative aspects of trust, identify characteristics that maintain trust, and inform the direction for future research.Entities:
Keywords: CTSA; community research partners; community-engaged research; translational science; trust
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30612444 PMCID: PMC6752969 DOI: 10.1177/0163278718819719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eval Health Prof ISSN: 0163-2787 Impact factor: 2.651