J Colné1, J-B Conart2, A Luc3, C Perrenot4, J-P Berrod2, K Angioi-Duprez2. 1. Service ophtalmologie, CHU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France. Electronic address: julie_colne@hotmail.com. 2. Service ophtalmologie, CHU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France. 3. PARC, CHU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France. 4. Service chirurgie digestive, CHU de Nancy, 54000 Nancy, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare performance on the EyeSi surgical simulator in 3 training modules by users with different levels of experience in ophthalmology. METHODS: We included 18 surgeons (6 residents with no cataract experience, 6 residents with little experience (1 to 10 cases) and 6 experienced cataract surgeons (over 500 cases). Three modules were selected (capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification-cracking and irrigation and aspiration). All subjects completed 12 levels of increasing difficulty twice, and the results of the second trial were analyzed according to the surgeon's experience. RESULTS: For the capsulorhexis module, experienced surgeons achieved higher total scores than the other 2 groups in exercise 1 (P=0.0102). For the phaco-cracking module, experienced surgeons achieved higher total scores in exercise 8 (P=0.0495) and a tendency toward significance in exercises 3 (P=0.0934) and 5 (P=0.0938). Participants with greater experience had lower total task time in exercises 1 (P=0.0444), 4 (P=0.06) and 5 (P=0.0189). CONCLUSION: Experienced surgeons outperformed residents with regard to overall score in 4 exercises of the capsulorhexis and phaco-cracking modules. Our results confirm previously demonstrated construct validity for these modules on the EyeSi simulator. These findings will help in the development of relevant training programs that could potentially be applied to the standard ophthalmological curriculum.
PURPOSE: To compare performance on the EyeSi surgical simulator in 3 training modules by users with different levels of experience in ophthalmology. METHODS: We included 18 surgeons (6 residents with no cataract experience, 6 residents with little experience (1 to 10 cases) and 6 experienced cataract surgeons (over 500 cases). Three modules were selected (capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification-cracking and irrigation and aspiration). All subjects completed 12 levels of increasing difficulty twice, and the results of the second trial were analyzed according to the surgeon's experience. RESULTS: For the capsulorhexis module, experienced surgeons achieved higher total scores than the other 2 groups in exercise 1 (P=0.0102). For the phaco-cracking module, experienced surgeons achieved higher total scores in exercise 8 (P=0.0495) and a tendency toward significance in exercises 3 (P=0.0934) and 5 (P=0.0938). Participants with greater experience had lower total task time in exercises 1 (P=0.0444), 4 (P=0.06) and 5 (P=0.0189). CONCLUSION: Experienced surgeons outperformed residents with regard to overall score in 4 exercises of the capsulorhexis and phaco-cracking modules. Our results confirm previously demonstrated construct validity for these modules on the EyeSi simulator. These findings will help in the development of relevant training programs that could potentially be applied to the standard ophthalmological curriculum.
Keywords:
Apprentissage phacoémulsification; Capsulorhexis; Capsulorhexis et aspiration des masses cristalliniennes; Cataract surgery; Construct validity; EyeSi cataract surgery simulator; Irrigation and aspiration; Phacoemulsification; Programme de formation type à la chirurgie de cataracte; Simulateur de chirurgie de cataracte EyeSi; Systematic training program; Validité de construction