Literature DB >> 30611114

Perceptions of barriers to accessing perinatal mental health care in midwifery: A scoping review.

Candice Jacquelyn Viveiros1, Elizabeth Kathleen Darling2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite greater contact with the healthcare system during the perinatal period, detection and treatment of perinatal mental health conditions remain suboptimal. AIM: To explore midwives' and midwifery clients' perceptions of factors that impede access to perinatal mental health care in high resource settings.
DESIGN: Scoping review.
METHODS: Arksey and O'Malley's (2006) framework for scoping studies was employed. A systematic search of the literature was completed. Included publications must have (1) addressed barriers to obtaining perinatal mental health care; (2) been either peer-reviewed primary literature or grey literature; (3) if primary literature, the study explored the perceptions of midwives or those in midwifery care; and (4) if grey literature, the publication pertained directly to midwifery care. A study was excluded from the review if (1) it was published in a language other than English; (2) it was published prior to the year 2000; or (3) it took place in a country with a Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) above 14. Identified barriers were mapped onto Levesque et al.'s (2013) ten-dimension framework (five supply-side dimensions and five demand-side dimensions) on access to health care in order to determine which points along the chain to accessing perinatal mental health care were most adversely impacted.
FINDINGS: The search yielded a total of 1051 records, and twenty-six were included in the review (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, grey literature). Supply-side barriers included midwives' lack of PMH training, knowledge, and confidence, both generally and cross-culturally; inconsistent screening practices; broken referral pathways; lack of specialized services; underlying stigma toward those with PMH concerns; inefficiently long wait lists for services; and midwives' perception that PMH is not within their scope of practice. Demand-side barriers included emotional isolation and loneliness; normalization of PMH concerns as symptoms of pregnancy; cultural norms surrounding motherhood and mental health; and symptoms of PMH concerns as inhibiting the ability to obtain help. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Twenty-one out of the twenty-six publications included in this review identified problems at the very beginning of the care-accessing process, suggesting that PMH care is often unapproachable, or that people are unable to perceive their need for care in the first place. Midwives can help ameliorate these initial barriers by engaging in additional perinatal mental health training in order to increase knowledge and confidence; being aware of community resources and referral pathways; and initiating discussion about perinatal mental health with all clients with the help of a validated screening tool.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Access; Barriers; Midwifery; Perinatal mental health; Scoping review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30611114     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  10 in total

1.  Pilot Testing a Brief Partner-Inclusive Hybrid Intervention for Perinatal Mood and Anxiety Disorders.

Authors:  Janelle S Peifer; Erin Bradley; Gita Taasoobshirazi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  A qualitative study of minority ethnic women's experiences of access to and engagement with perinatal mental health care.

Authors:  Sabrina Pilav; Kaat De Backer; Abigail Easter; Sergio A Silverio; Sushma Sundaresh; Sara Roberts; Louise M Howard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  "We do not know how to screen and provide treatment": a qualitative study of barriers and enablers of implementing perinatal depression health services in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abel Fekadu Dadi; Emma R Miller; Telake Azale; Lillian Mwanri
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2021-05-05

4.  Fostering Collective Approaches in Supporting Perinatal Mental Healthcare Access for Migrant Women: A Participatory Health Research Study.

Authors:  Kathleen Markey; Maria Noonan; Owen Doody; Teresa Tuohy; Tony Daly; Ciara Regan; Claire O'Donnell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Experiences of Perinatal Mental Health Care among Minority Ethnic Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic in London: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sabrina Pilav; Abigail Easter; Sergio A Silverio; Kaat De Backer; Sushma Sundaresh; Sara Roberts; Louise M Howard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Implementation of the 'Kimberley Mum's Mood Scale' across primary health care services in the Kimberley region of Western Australia: A mixed methods assessment.

Authors:  Emma Carlin; Katherine Ferrari; Erica P Spry; Melissa Williams; David Atkinson; Julia V Marley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Assessment of Canadian perinatal mental health services from the provider perspective: Where can we improve?

Authors:  Laurel M Hicks; Christine Ou; Jaime Charlebois; Lesley Tarasoff; Jodi Pawluski; Leslie E Roos; Amanda Hooykaas; Nichole Fairbrother; Michelle Carter; Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.435

8.  Information on, knowledge and utilisation of support services during pregnancy and after childbirth: cross-sectional analyses of predictors using data from the KUNO-Kids health study.

Authors:  Susanne Brandstetter; David Rothfuß; Birgit Seelbach-Göbel; Michael Melter; Michael Kabesch; Christian Apfelbacher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Opening the door: midwives' perceptions of two models of psychosocial assessment in pregnancy- a mixed methods study.

Authors:  V Schmied; N Reilly; E Black; D Kingston; K Talcevska; V Mule; M-P Austin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Service User and Service Provider Perceptions of Enablers and Barriers for Refugee and Asylum-Seeking Women Accessing and Engaging with Perinatal Mental Health Care Services in the WHO European Region: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Authors:  Kathleen Markey; Anne MacFarlane; Maria Noonan; Mairead Moloney; Susann Huschke; Kate O'Donnell; Claire O'Donnell; Teresa Tuohy; Ahmed Hassan Mohamed; Owen Doody
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.