Literature DB >> 30611112

The computational basis of following advice in adolescents.

Julia M Rodriguez Buritica1, Hauke R Heekeren2, Wouter van den Bos3.   

Abstract

Advice taking helps one to quickly acquire knowledge and make decisions. This age-comparative study (in children [8- to 10-year-olds], adolescents [13- to 15-year-olds], and adults [18- to 22-year-olds]) investigated developmental differences in how advice, experience, and exploration influence learning. The results showed that adolescents were initially easily swayed to follow peer advice but also switched more rapidly to exploring alternatives like children. Whereas adults stayed with the advice over the task, adolescents put more weight on their own experience compared with adults. A social learning model showed that although social influence most strongly affects adolescents' initial expectations (i.e., their priors), adolescents showed higher exploration and discovered the other good option in the current task. Thus, our model resolved the apparently conflicting findings of adolescents being more and less sensitive to peer influence and provides novel insights into the dynamic interaction between social and individual learning.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Advice taking; Development; Exploration; Learning from experience; Social reinforcement learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30611112      PMCID: PMC8973021          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  52 in total

Review 1.  The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations.

Authors:  L P Spear
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Do you like me? Neural correlates of social evaluation and developmental trajectories.

Authors:  Bregtje Gunther Moor; Linda van Leijenhorst; Serge A R B Rombouts; Eveline A Crone; Maurits W Van der Molen
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Developmental change in feedback processing as reflected by phasic heart rate changes.

Authors:  Eveline A Crone; J Richard Jennings; Maurits W Van der Molen
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2004-11

4.  Neural and psychological maturation of decision-making in adolescence and young adulthood.

Authors:  Anastasia Christakou; Samuel J Gershman; Yael Niv; Andrew Simmons; Mick Brammer; Katya Rubia
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking.

Authors:  Laurence Steinberg
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2008-03

6.  Developmental differences in the neural dynamics of observational learning.

Authors:  Julia M Rodriguez Buritica; Hauke R Heekeren; Shu-Chen Li; Ben Eppinger
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Adolescent-specific patterns of behavior and neural activity during social reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jones; Leah H Somerville; Jian Li; Erika J Ruberry; Alisa Powers; Natasha Mehta; Jonathan Dyke; B J Casey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Better than expected or as bad as you thought? The neurocognitive development of probabilistic feedback processing.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Berna Güroğlu; Bianca G van den Bulk; Serge A R B Rombouts; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Pubertal development and behavior: hormonal activation of social and motivational tendencies.

Authors:  Erika E Forbes; Ronald E Dahl
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study.

Authors:  Kimberly Goodyear; Raja Parasuraman; Sergey Chernyak; Poornima Madhavan; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

1.  Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework.

Authors:  Simon Ciranka; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 2.  Reinforcement learning across development: What insights can we draw from a decade of research?

Authors:  Kate Nussenbaum; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  The actions of others act as a pseudo-reward to drive imitation in the context of social reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Anis Najar; Emmanuelle Bonnet; Bahador Bahrami; Stefano Palminteri
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice.

Authors:  Madeleine E Moses-Payne; Johanna Habicht; Aislinn Bowler; Nikolaus Steinbeis; Tobias U Hauser
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-03-08

5.  Impaired learning to dissociate advantageous and disadvantageous risky choices in adolescents.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Jessica V Schaaf; Ingmar Visser; Hilde M Huizenga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Social influence in adolescence as a double-edged sword.

Authors:  Lucas Molleman; Simon Ciranka; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Exploration heuristics decrease during youth.

Authors:  Magda Dubois; Aislinn Bowler; Madeleine E Moses-Payne; Johanna Habicht; Rani Moran; Nikolaus Steinbeis; Tobias U Hauser
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Preference uncertainty accounts for developmental effects on susceptibility to peer influence in adolescence.

Authors:  Andrea M F Reiter; Michael Moutoussis; Lucy Vanes; Rogier Kievit; Edward T Bullmore; Ian M Goodyer; Peter Fonagy; Peter B Jones; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Social information use in adolescents: The impact of adults, peers and household composition.

Authors:  Lucas Molleman; Patricia Kanngiesser; Wouter van den Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.