Literature DB >> 30610462

Investigating the effect of sterilisation methods on the physical properties and cytocompatibility of methyl cellulose used in combination with alginate for 3D-bioplotting of chondrocytes.

Ella Hodder1,2, Sarah Duin3, David Kilian3, Tilman Ahlfeld3, Julia Seidel3,4, Carsten Nachtigall4, Peter Bush5, Derek Covill6, Michael Gelinsky3, Anja Lode7.   

Abstract

For both the incorporation of cells and future therapeutic applications the sterility of a biomaterial must be ensured. However, common sterilisation techniques are intense and often negatively impact on material physicochemical attributes, which can affect its suitability for tissue engineering and 3D printing. In the present study four sterilisation methods, autoclave, supercritical CO2 (scCO2) treatment, UV- and gamma (γ) irradiation were evaluated regarding their impact on material properties and cellular responses. The investigations were performed on methyl cellulose (MC) as a component of an alginate/methyl cellulose (alg/MC) bioink, used for bioprinting embedded bovine primary chondrocytes (BPCs). In contrast to the autoclave, scCO2 and UV-treatments, the γ-irradiated MC resulted in a strong reduction in alg/MC viscosity and stability after extrusion which made this method unsuitable for precise bioprinting. Gel permeation chromatography analysis revealed a significant reduction in MC molecular mass only after γ-irradiation, which influenced MC chain mobility in the Ca2+-crosslinked alginate network as well as gel composition and microstructure. With regard to cell survival and proteoglycan matrix production, the results determined UV-irradiation and autoclaving as the best candidates for sterilisation. The scCO2-treatment of MC resulted in an unfavourable cell response indicating that this method needs careful optimisation prior to application for cell encapsulation. As proven by consistent FT-IR spectra, chemical alterations could be excluded as a cause for the differences seen between MC treatments on alg/MC behaviour. This investigation provides knowledge for the development of a clinically appropriate 3D-printing-based fabrication process to produce bioengineered tissue for cartilage regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30610462     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-018-6211-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  13 in total

1.  In Vivo Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printed, Keratin-Based Hydrogels in a Porcine Thermal Burn Model.

Authors:  Javier Navarro; Ryan M Clohessy; Robert C Holder; Alexis R Gabard; Gregory J Herendeen; Robert J Christy; Luke R Burnett; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Viability and Functionality of Neonatal Porcine Islet-like Cell Clusters Bioprinted in Alginate-Based Bioinks.

Authors:  Sarah Duin; Shreya Bhandarkar; Susann Lehmann; Elisabeth Kemter; Eckhard Wolf; Michael Gelinsky; Barbara Ludwig; Anja Lode
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  3D Bioprinting of osteochondral tissue substitutes - in vitro-chondrogenesis in multi-layered mineralized constructs.

Authors:  David Kilian; Tilman Ahlfeld; Ashwini Rahul Akkineni; Anne Bernhardt; Michael Gelinsky; Anja Lode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Kaoru Aoki; Naoto Saito
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 5.  Sterilization and disinfection methods for decellularized matrix materials: Review, consideration and proposal.

Authors:  Meihan Tao; Tianrang Ao; Xiaoyan Mao; Xinzhu Yan; Rabia Javed; Weijian Hou; Yang Wang; Cong Sun; Shuang Lin; Tianhao Yu; Qiang Ao
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-02-27

6.  3D bioprinting of hepatocytes: core-shell structured co-cultures with fibroblasts for enhanced functionality.

Authors:  Rania Taymour; David Kilian; Tilman Ahlfeld; Michael Gelinsky; Anja Lode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Biomaterials Based on Marine Resources for 3D Bioprinting Applications.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Dezhi Zhou; Jianwei Chen; Xiuxiu Zhang; Xinda Li; Wenxiang Zhao; Tao Xu
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 5.118

8.  Tailorable Zinc-Substituted Mesoporous Bioactive Glass/Alginate-Methylcellulose Composite Bioinks.

Authors:  Vera Guduric; Niall Belton; Richard Frank Richter; Anne Bernhardt; Janina Spangenberg; Chengtie Wu; Anja Lode; Michael Gelinsky
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Controlled and Local Delivery of Antibiotics by 3D Core/Shell Printed Hydrogel Scaffolds to Treat Soft Tissue Infections.

Authors:  Ashwini Rahul Akkineni; Janina Spangenberg; Michael Geissler; Saskia Reichelt; Hubert Buechner; Anja Lode; Michael Gelinsky
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.321

10.  3D-Printed, Dual Crosslinked and Sterile Aerogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Ana Iglesias-Mejuto; Carlos A García-González
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.