Francesco Certo1, Massimiliano Maione1, Massimiliano Visocchi2, Giuseppe M V Barbagallo3. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "Gaspare Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy. 2. Institute of Neurosurgery, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "Gaspare Rodolico" University Hospital, Catania, Italy. giuseppebarbagal@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A retro-odontoid pseudotumour compressing the spinal cord and causing myelopathy is often associated with an inflammatory condition such as rheumatoid arthritis. A degenerative non-inflammatory retro-odontoid pseudotumour responsible for clinically relevant spinal cord compression is a rare condition described in small clinical series and is likely associated with craniovertebral junction hypermobility or instability-like conditions. For several years, direct removal of the lesion through an anterior or lateral approach has been advocated as the best surgical option. However, in the last decade the posterior approach to the craniovertebral junction, to perform C1-C2 fixation and C1 laminectomy without removal of the retro-odontoid tissue, has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing retro-odontoid pannus as well as in obtaining improvement of myelopathy. METHODS: In this paper we analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of seven patients (five males and two females) treated with posterior C1-C2 fixation and C1 laminectomy for a degenerative non-inflammatory retro-odontoid pseudotumour responsible for spinal cord compression. C1 laminectomy provided immediate spinal cord decompression. We also review the relevant literature focusing on associated cervical degenerative conditions that may contribute to triggering or acceleration of atlantoaxial hypermobility or 'instability', causing formation of the retro-odontoid tissue. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period (of six followed-up patients) was 55.8 months (range 10-96 months). In all cases the Nurick score at the latest follow-up visit demonstrated clinical improvement; magnetic resonance imaging during follow-up demonstrated progressive reduction of the retro-odontoid pseudotumour in all but one patient, who died of surgery-unrelated disease in the early postoperative period. No vascular or neural damage secondary to C1-C2 fixation was observed. CONCLUSION: C1-C2 fixation associated with C1 laminectomy is an effective surgical option to treat myelopathy secondary to a degenerative retro-odontoid pseudotumour. In these cases, direct removal of intracanalar tissue compressing the spinal cord is not required, as C1-C2 fixation is sufficient to cause its disappearance.
BACKGROUND: A retro-odontoid pseudotumour compressing the spinal cord and causing myelopathy is often associated with an inflammatory condition such as rheumatoid arthritis. A degenerative non-inflammatory retro-odontoid pseudotumour responsible for clinically relevant spinal cord compression is a rare condition described in small clinical series and is likely associated with craniovertebral junction hypermobility or instability-like conditions. For several years, direct removal of the lesion through an anterior or lateral approach has been advocated as the best surgical option. However, in the last decade the posterior approach to the craniovertebral junction, to perform C1-C2 fixation and C1 laminectomy without removal of the retro-odontoid tissue, has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing retro-odontoid pannus as well as in obtaining improvement of myelopathy. METHODS: In this paper we analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of seven patients (five males and two females) treated with posterior C1-C2 fixation and C1 laminectomy for a degenerative non-inflammatory retro-odontoid pseudotumour responsible for spinal cord compression. C1 laminectomy provided immediate spinal cord decompression. We also review the relevant literature focusing on associated cervical degenerative conditions that may contribute to triggering or acceleration of atlantoaxial hypermobility or 'instability', causing formation of the retro-odontoid tissue. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period (of six followed-up patients) was 55.8 months (range 10-96 months). In all cases the Nurick score at the latest follow-up visit demonstrated clinical improvement; magnetic resonance imaging during follow-up demonstrated progressive reduction of the retro-odontoid pseudotumour in all but one patient, who died of surgery-unrelated disease in the early postoperative period. No vascular or neural damage secondary to C1-C2 fixation was observed. CONCLUSION:C1-C2 fixation associated with C1 laminectomy is an effective surgical option to treat myelopathy secondary to a degenerative retro-odontoid pseudotumour. In these cases, direct removal of intracanalar tissue compressing the spinal cord is not required, as C1-C2 fixation is sufficient to cause its disappearance.